Lawsuit: Pending T3rrarian V. Alexotto09 [2026] DCR 83

[gamerpizzaplayz]

T3rrarian (represented by pizza at law)
prosecution
V.
Alexotto09
defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
on the 11th of June 2026 my client and the defendant agreed to the following agreement. alexatto09 -" after recieving the payment I agree to give the user t3rarian the elytra immediately" then my client payed the defendant the agreed apon 999 dollars. after this the defendant refused to give the elytra not only that but he shot my client in the head multiple times. My client also lost potential profit from his job as a miner which he was going to use the elytra for.

I. parties
1. T3rrarian (prosecution)
2. Alexotto09 (defendant)

II. facts
1. my client and Alexotto09 went into an agreement, 999 dollars for an elytra
2. my client went through on his side of the agreement but the defendant did not
3. after my client paid the defendant started shooting my client in the head multiple times
4. since my client was not able to get the elytra he wasn't able to use it for his job as a miner.

III. claims for relief
1.according to section 4 of the contracts act my client and the defendant met all of the requirements to enter into a contract which are offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
2. as stated in section 7 clause 1 of the contracts Act "A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations." the defendant did not fulfil their contractual obligations in the form of giving my client the elytra he paid for
3. As stated in Section 4, Clause 1(a) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act, “in civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed.” The defendant aimed and shot a firearm at my client causing much trauma and physical damage

IIII. prayers for relief
We are asking for the following:
$999 - original purchase
$200 - loss of profit
$2000 - assault
$1000 - trauma

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@Alexotto09 , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of t3rrarian v. Alexotto09 [2026] DCR 83

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[ko531]

Since the defendant failed to appear a Public Defender will be assigned.

 

[Dartanboy]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

I. ANSWER
1. AFFIRM the Plaintiff and Alexotto09 went into an agreement, 999 dollars for an elytra
2. AFFIRM the Plaintiff went through on his side of the agreement but, DO NOT CONTEST the defendant did not
3. DO NOT CONTEST after the Plaintiff paid, the defendant started shooting my client in the head multiple times
4. DO NOT CONTEST since the Plaintiff was not able to get the elytra he wasn't able to use it for his job as a miner.

II. DEFENSES
1. Exaggerated damages in the form of "assault" and "trauma."

Motion

MOTION TO DISMISS

The Defense moves that the following Prayers for Relief are dismissed, for Rule 5.5 - Lack of Claim:

$2000 - assault
$1000 - trauma

"Assault" and "Trauma" are not valid Claims for Relief.

Motion

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
The facts are not in contest. We ask for Summary Judgement.

 

[gamerpizzaplayz]

your honor my client was assaulted by the defendant by the definition of assault as stated in section 4 clause 1(b) of the standardized criminal code act "places another player in a position of danger, including but not limited to pointing a weapon at them." My client was put into a dangerous situation by the defendant and according to Section 4, Clause 1(a) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act as stated previously “in civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed.”
That is were the 2000 dollars for assault came from. This claim is also supported by the previous evidence.

 

[ko531]

Motion

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
The facts are not in contest. We ask for Summary Judgement.

Motion for Summary Judgment granted.

This case will be in recess pending verdict.

Motion

MOTION TO DISMISS

The Defense moves that the following Prayers for Relief are dismissed, for Rule 5.5 - Lack of Claim:


"Assault" and "Trauma" are not valid Claims for Relief.

Motion to Dismiss denied.

This is pointless with the summary judgment. If there is no value to the prayers, then the court can just not grant them when rendering a verdict.