- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Showeh
Plaintiff
v.
MeneerDeMeneer
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Showeh (Plaintiff)
2. MeneerDeMeneer (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On September 13th, 2026, the defendant claimed in the official DemocracyCraft discord that they finished making an exchange (automated trading system further) located at url Item Exchange · DemocracyCraft . The defendant is the owner of the "item_exchange" business. See P-001, P-002
2. The defendant developed the system which incorrectly evaluates orders. 24 shulker shells estimated as 472.80$ while the average price of one shell according to the trading system is 200.00$. See P-003
3. One elytra on the defendant's trading system was estimated for 12000$ on buying orders. See P-004
3. The plaintiff totally sold goods on the price of 28100$ totally for the period of time between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3 according to the defendant's site ("Price" column denotes price per item). See P-005, P-008
4. The plaintiff withdrew 1949.89$ totally between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3, and doesn't have any money left on their account, according to the defendant's site. See P-006, P-007, P-008, P-011
5. The defendant has been fixed the error on their automate trading system after the plaintiff's complaint. See P-008
6. The plaintiff has tested the defendant's automated system before engaging in selling goods in the period of time between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3. See P-009, P-011
7. The defendant claimed on their automate trading system: "Every item. Every dollar. Recorder in the exchange ledger". See P-010
8. The defendant hasn't returned the Plaintiff's 688.97$ loss, which they suffered after spendings on the deals in automate trading system between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3. See P-011.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce (RCCA Part VI §3)
The Redmont Civil Code Act Part VI, §3 notes that the defendant commits Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce when they made an inappropriate managing of the automated trading system, making the plaintiff misled in connection with supply of goods: price of goods were higher than the system paid for the plaintiff (See P-003, See P-008). A specific numeric buy price in an automated trading system is a precise, machine-generated representation a user is meant to act on (See P-004). So, the idea of buying goods from local chest shops to sell them in the defendant's trading system was reasonable, including that the plaintiff had tested the system before they engaged in deals between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3 (See P-009, P-011) on the defendant's platform. So, the plaintiff definitely expected that the system would be work correctly while they were selling goods.
2. Negligence (RCCA Part XIII §3)
RCCA Part XIII §3 says that the defendant commits Negligence because they owed a duty of care in the form of trust between traders on the platform and the owner of the company who sustains and develops the trading platform. The defendant claimed: "Every item. Every dollar. Recorder in the exchange ledger" (See P-010) on their automated trading system. This claim had promoted the defendant's system as reliable for the plaintiff, which had called a trust. However, their duty of care to the plaintiff was breached through careless managing of the automate trading system, which misled the plaintiff by the disinformation of the actual prices in the orderbook on the trading system. The other prices, not those which were claimed by the trading system, were used for estimating resulted value of the deals conducted by the plaintiff (See P-003, P-008)). So, this breaching makes expected profit for a plaintiff into 688.97$ loss.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following relief from the Defendant:
1. 688.97$ for total loss the plaintiff suffered conducting the deals on the defendant's platform between September 14th 23:36 GMT+3 and September 15th 00:07 GMT+3.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 15th day of September 2026.
