Sam07x v. Culls [2026] FCR 69

[Areaous]

Case Filing​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

IgnitedTNT
Plaintiff

v.

Culls
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Sam07x is the owner and holder of 5000 Class A shares (50% ownership stake) in UserMart. The remaining 5000 Class A shares (50% ownership stake) are currently held by Culls. After Culls’ destruction of the DOJ discord server, he was permanently banned from the DemocracyCraft Server. As a result of this permanent ban, Culls is no longer able to participate in the management, operation, or affairs of UserMart. To ensure that on-going operations are continued and players can benefit from the services offered by this business, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the court transfer Culls’ 5000 Class A shares to his business partner Sam07x. Additionally, three real-estate plots were also owned by the business, UserMart. These plots are held in Culls’ name but are ultimately owned by the business. The Plaintiff requests that the court transfer these plots to Sam07x so UserMart operations can successfully continue.


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

"I, IgnitedTnT, bought UserMart & UserGroup with Culls early this year. In the purchase agreement, there were three plots included on the name of the company. These being Av-C062, Av-C063 and C675 which were held by Culls, but have been UserMart/UserGroup property. I later in the year sold my 50% stake to Sam07x and recently bought back my entire stake in the company. As Culls is currently permanently deported, I aim to have the court recognize me as 100% shareholder of UserGroup and therefore UserMart, already currently serving as Chief Executive Officer, as well as transfer Av-C062/Av-C63 and C675, being company property, directly to me."

I. PARTIES

1. Sam07x (Plaintiff)

2. Culls (Defendant)



II. FACTS

1. On January 9th, 2026, Culls and IgnitedTnT purchased UserMart from UsernameDude100 and Musrodent.

2. This sale included all business operations, branding assets, goodwill, and three real estate plots for a total purchase price of $130,000. These plots are Av-c062, Av-c063, and C675.

3. On May 10, 2026, Sam07x purchased 5000 Class A shares (50% ownership stake) of UserMart from IgnitedTnT. This transaction was noted in the UserMart company docket.

4. During the week of the 20th of July 2026, Culls was permanently banned from the DemocracyCraft server.



III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Under the Legal Entity Act, ownership of shares is recorded in the Company’s Docket and does not automatically extinguish upon a permanent ban. However, the Act does not prohibit this Court from granting equitable relief where continued joint ownership has become impossible or would produce an unjust result. Continued joint ownership has become impossible due to the permanent banning of the Defendant.

2. The Plaintiff is the sole remaining active shareholder capable of operating UserMart. Leaving fifty percent of the company under the formal ownership of a permanently banned player creates a deadlock and prevents the business from properly functioning

3. The Defendant has been permanently banned from the DemocracyCraft server. As a result, he is unable to access the server, manage Usermart, exercise voting rights attached to his shares, or perform any of the ordinary functions of a co-owner. The Supreme Court of Redmont has authoritatively held that permanently banned players “have no rights in our nation and have no rights to dispute this in court.” (UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2). Because the Defendant has been stripped of the practical and legal ability to participate in the affairs of UserMart, continued recognition of his formal 50% ownership interest serves no legitimate purpose and actively obstructs the sole remaining owner’s ability to operate the company.

4. The Civil Code Act Part II Section 7(6) specifies that “Remedies under civil law may include damages, specific performance, injunctions, or other forms of equitable relief”. The transfer of these shares and plots fall under the concept of equitable relief and is within the purview, scope, and legal authority of the Court.



IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. The transfer of all 5000 Class A UserMart shares from Culls to Sam07x

2. The transfer of plots Av-c062, Av-c063, and C675 from Culls to Sam07x.

3. Costs to cover legal fees associated with this matter at 30% of the total case value or $6000 - whichever is more.



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED:This 2nd of September, 2026

 

[Areaous]

Motion​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION


Your Honor,

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court issue an emergency injunction to halt the possible eviction and/or government auction of plots Av-c062, Av-c063, and C675 until a verdict in this case is reached.

These plots are rightfully owned by UserMart - they are held in the Defendants name and are the subject of this case. Any eviction of the plots as a result of the actions of the Defendant would seriously harm the Plaintiff and their ownership of UserMart.

 

[Areaous]

Forgive me your honor, I accidentally forgot to attach the evidence. I am in the process of doing so now. If you view this case before the evidence has been attached, know that it is there but I am yet to attach it

 

[Matthew100x]

Motion​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION


Your Honor,

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court issue an emergency injunction to halt the possible eviction and/or government auction of plots Av-c062, Av-c063, and C675 until a verdict in this case is reached.

These plots are rightfully owned by UserMart - they are held in the Defendants name and are the subject of this case. Any eviction of the plots as a result of the actions of the Defendant would seriously harm the Plaintiff and their ownership of UserMart.

Your Honor,

We are requesting a right to be joined to this case by right of intervention (see Court Rule 4.8, Information - Court Rules and Procedures) or by way of joinder (see Part IV, § 6(1)(b), Act of Congress - Redmont Civil Code Act). The Commonwealth's rights are significantly impacted if this Court proceeds to grant an emergency injunction against the Commonwealth without us being allowed to argue against the motion.

Sincerely,
Matthew100x
Attorney General

 

[Areaous]

I would like to notify the court that the client has gone to a different firm and I will no longer be pursuing this case