Lawsuit: Pending roy405 v. Department of Homeland Security

[Johnes]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


roy405
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Homeland Security
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 17th of January 2026, roy405, the Plaintiff, was apprehended by a DHS Lieutenant, Multiman155, based on a flawed and unenforceable warrant, that the individual in question misled the court about. Plaintiff's rights were therefore violated and he is owed due compensation.

I. PARTIES
1. roy405
2. Department of Homeland Security
3. Multiman155 (At the time when the violation took place, a lieutenant of the DHS)

II. FACTS
1. At or before the arrest took place, Plaintiff had around 128 wanted stars, equating to 128 murders. (P-001)
2. Defendant requested an arrest warrant, requesting: (P-001)
(1) teleport Roy405 to /spawn using any tools available to any officer thereof, and arrest Roy405; or, in the alternative
(2) be given permission to break blocks on Roy405's player Build World plots to arrest Roy405; or, in the alternative
(3) instantly jail Roy405 using the /jail command, or a related command.
3. In support thereof, Defendant supplied the Court two images, one showing Plaintiff's alleged "impenetrable box" in the player build world, the other a list of wanted subjects where Plaintiff has 127 stars. (P-001)
4. The Court granted Defendant's request in full. (P-001)
5. Defendant followed up, stating that Defendant teleported Plaintiff to spawn using /spawn and arrested and jailed Plaintiff. Defendant posted a screenshot of a command, teleporting Plaintiff to spawn. (P-001)
6. Defendant used Department of Public Affairs powers to teleport Plaintiff: (P-003, page 365)
## Teleport### ActionAction: ``Target Player to Employee``### InformationEmployee: ``Multiman155``Player: ``roy405``Reason: ``WARRANT - https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/lt-franciscus-arrestwarrant-request.34487/#post-132270``Location: ``Reveille 2724, 71, 4153``Region (if applicable): ``spawn``
7. Multiman155 announced Plaintiff's successful capture in Defendant's chats ("DHS Logs"). (P-002, pages 106 and 107)
8. Shortly after Plaintiff's arrest, the DHS Logs state: (P-002, page 106)
Investigator Culls Ashley » we just tped him spawn
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » Did someone just arrest him?
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » Oh
Investigator Culls Ashley » idk
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » I got a warrant to tp him to spawn and arrest
him
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » WELL DONE
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » Clapping hands emoji | celebration emoji
[Staff] Archivist Hellside S. Burnton » Arrested???
Investigator Culls Ashley » yes
9. Shortly thereafter, the following conversation happened in the DHS Logs: (P-002, pages 107 and 108)
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » So jsrkiwi's dumb question of the day - what law provides
for arrest warrants like Roy's?
Investigator Culls Ashley » thats a good question
[...]
Investigator Culls Ashley » lol
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » executive standards act, probably
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » there's also authority to use them to enter
private property under JSA 17(1)(c)
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » Warrants, generally, proceed from Judicial
Power under Const. 13
Police Officer Jayessar Kiwi » Thnx
10. Plaintiff was subsequently jailed for a total time of 32 hours and fined $44,800. (P-004)
11. Plaintiff was later bailed out, serving only 1 hour and 22 minutes. (P-004)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Warrant was unlawful
The Warrant issued to Defendant was unlawfully granted, its legal foundations nonexistent in the present JSA and in the old JSA.

A. There was no legal foundation to grant the warrant
Defendant, as pointed out in fact #2, requested for the following:

The DHS therefore asks for a warrant to:
(1) teleport Roy405 to /spawn using any tools available to any officer thereof, and arrestRoy405; or, in the alternative
(2) be given permission to break blocks on Roy405's player Build World plots to arrestRoy405; or, in the alternative
(3) instantly jail Roy405 using the /jail command, or a related command.

Defendant's request unlawfully asked to teleport Plaintiff to spawn, or break blocks in Plaintiff's player build world, or instantly jail him.

Both the old JSA and new JSA allow only for specific warrants.

The new JSA's Part IV states the following:

PART IV — WARRANTS​

1. Warrant Authority
(1) A court may hear a warrant application to authorise the Commonwealth to take an action that would otherwise be unconstitutional.

(2) After considering an application for a warrant, a court may:
(a) Refuse to issue the warrant;
(b) Issue the warrant without modification; or
(c) Modify and issue the warrant.

2. Search Warrants
(1) A Search Warrant permits an authorised officer to enter private property, inspect assets, or access digital documents for the purpose of locating evidence, contraband, or any materials relevant to an active investigation or legal proceeding.

(2) A search warrant must specify the property, assets, or documents being searched in as much detail as possible.

(3) This warrant can be requested by authorised members in the DOJ, DHS, and DOC.
(a) The Secretaries of the DOJ, DHS, and DOC are authorized members for the purposes of §2(3)
(b) The Secretaries of the DOJ, DHS, and DOC are empowered to designate employees of their respective Departments as authorized members for the purposes of §2(3).

3. Asset Seizure Warrants
(1) An Asset Seizure Warrant permits an authorised officer to seize assets when an individual does not have sufficient monetary funds to pay a court order or unsettled fines.

(2) An asset seizure warrant must not be issued for a fine less than two months old, or unless the authorised officer has provided the debtor with at least five days' notice of the intention to seek the warrant and of its consequences.

(3) An asset seizure warrant may also be used to enforce the transfer of assets under legal process, including, without limitation, the compulsory acquisition of property through eminent domain and the seizure of financial assets by the relevant authority.

(4) An asset seizure warrant must specify the assets being seized in as much detail as possible.

(5) The Debtor must be given a 5-day notice by the DHS for any debt collection through an asset seizure warrant. The Debtor must be informed that they must pay the outstanding amount due within 5 days, or their assets will be seized to cover the outstanding debt.

(6) This warrant can be requested by authorised members in the DOJ, DHS, and DOC.
(a) The Secretaries of the DOJ, DHS, and DOC are authorized members for the purposes of §3(6)
(b) The Secretaries of the DOJ, DHS, and DOC are empowered to designate employees of their respective Departments as authorized members for the purposes of §3(6).

4. Arrest Warrants
(1) An Arrest Warrant authorises an authorised officer to enter private property and arrest a wanted individual.

(2) This warrant can only be executed by authorised members in the DHS.

(3) This warrant can be requested by authorised members in the DHS.
(a) The Secretary of the DHS is an authorized member for the purposes of §4(3)
(b) The Secretary of the DHS is empowered to designate employees of the Department as authorized members for the purposes of §4(3)

5. Investigative Warrants
(1) An Investigative Warrant authorises a Detective, accompanied or unaccompanied, to enter private property in order to search for clues relating to an active case.

The old JSA's § 8 states the following:

8 - Warrants
(1) The court may issue warrants - court orders that allow actions that would otherwise be unlawful - for the following:
a. Search - Expresses permission for a Police Officer, Investigator, or Compliance Officer, accompanied or unaccompanied, to enter private property, view private assets, or access digital documents in order to search for evidence or contraband. Staff will be required to assist with searching storage containers if required, however the Officer will not have direct access. Search Warrants must detail exactly what is being requested and judicial officers must include any modifications to the request they have made when approving the warrant. This warrant can be requested by authorized members in the DoJ, DHS, and DoC.
b. Asset Seizure - to seize assets when an individual does not have sufficient monetary funds to pay a court order or unsettled fines. The unpaid fines must have been standing for at least 2 months and can be seen in the DoJ DHS #fines channel. A DHS employee must also /mail the person about their fines at least three days prior to requesting an asset seizure warrant. If a government agency requires an asset to be transferred to itself within its lawful actions (ie: Eminent Domain by the DCT or Seizing Bank assets by the DOC), they may request a warrant or ask the DHS to do so on their behalf to be able to gain possession of said asset. Asset Warrants must detail exactly what is being seized and judicial officers must include any modifications to the request they made when approving the warrant.
c. Arrest Warrant - for entering private property to arrest a wanted individual. This warrant can only be executed by authorized members in the DHS.

d. Investigative - Expresses permission for a Detective, accompanied or unaccompanied, to enter private property in order to search for clues relating to an active case.

Both of these laws only allow for the following types of warrants:
1. to search someone,
2. to seize someone's assets,
3. to enter someone's private property to arrest them, and
4. to investigate someone by means requested.

The Warrant aforementioned does not fit any of these types of warrants, and is therefore unlawful, as it calls to teleport Plaintiff to spawn.

2. On Compensatory Damages
Because the Warrant was unlawful, Plaintiff's arrest was therefore unlawful as well.

At the time the arrest took place, the penalty for mass murder was 3.5 Penalty Units. Because Plaintiff committed 128 murders, the fine was $44,800. Along with that, Plaintiff was given 32 hours of jail time and served only 1 hour and 22 minutes, which equates to $4400, a total of $49,200.

The Criminal Code Act's Part I § 6(1)(c) states that: "If an individual is found to be not guilty of a crime after punishment has been imposed, they shall be compensated $50 per minute spent in jail for offences found unproven, alongside a reimbursement of any fine paid for unproven offences."

Even though Plaintiff is guilty of committing the murders, the method of the arrest, and by extension, the Warrant, was egregious enough, that it should warrant the same relief as if Plaintiff was not guilty of said crimes.

3. On Loss of Enjoyment
Plaintiff is a known criminal that likes to engage in the criminal side of Redmont. Plaintiff's enjoyment on the server comes from engaging in the criminal RP.

Defendant, by directly and unfairly teleporting Plaintiff with an unlawful warrant, caused Loss of Enjoyment for Plaintiff.

4. On Punitive Damages
Defendant's request for the Warrant, as we have shown, is unlawful and is not based on any legal ground whatsoever.

Multiman155 even shows this in DHS Logs, by stating:

[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » executive standards act, probably
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » there's also authority to use them to enter
private property under JSA 17(1)(c)
[Sen.] Senate President Multiman155 » Warrants, generally, proceed from Judicial
Power under Const. 13

This shows that Multiman155 was himself unsure of the legal grounds behind the Warrant and therefore Defendant by extension was liable.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $49,200 in Compensatory Damages.
2. $50,000 in Consequential Damages for Loss of Enjoyment.
3. $100,000 in Punitive Damages for Defendant's conduct.
4. 30% of the relief sought in Legal Fees.

Spoiler: P-001

See P-001

Spoiler: P-002

See P-002

Spoiler: P-003

See P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Witnesses:
DHS Whistleblower (Their identity will be revealed in closed court)
Multiman155
roy405

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 15th day of May 2026

Spoiler: Consent to Represent

 

[Franciscus]

Recusing.

 

[Johnes]

We'd like to reveal some evidence in closed Court.