- Joined
- Aug 21, 2025
- Messages
- 250
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
RiggoSoft
Plaintiff
v.
dimitre977
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs complains against the Defendant as follows:
Written Statement
I. Parties
1. Oakridge Community Bank (The bank, the company the defendant was employed by under P-01)
2. dimitre977 (Defendant)
3. RiggoSoft (Plaintiff, Chief Executive Officer prior to defendant's appointment, referred to as successor in P-01)
4. DiehardDave (Potential customer of the Plaintiff)
II. Facts
All dates are formatted mm/dd/yyyy and times are formatted 12:00 in the Eastern Standard Time time zone
1. On 12/22/2025 at 1:34 PM the defendant contacts the plaintiff regarding a job listing posted by the plaintiff regarding the role of Chief Executive Officer of Oakridge Community Bank. (P-01)
2. The defendant and the plaintiff continue to talk about the job the defendant is inquiring for, the requirements and potential for compensation. (P-01)
3. On 12/22/2025 at 7:22 PM the defendant asks "Ok is the bank in any financial trouble and do I have to take care of the government aspect?" (P-01)
4. On 12/22/2025 at 7:31 PM the plaintiff responds "Yes you have to take care of the government aspect" and then informs the defendant that "No finacial" (referring to finacial issues) (P-01)
5. The defendant and the plaintiff keep discussing the conditions of the job and the specifics of the agreement. However do not talk about the reports of the bank and the defendant does not ask for the reports. (P-01)
6. On 12/23/2025 at 2:12 PM the plaintiff sends the defendant a file titled "OCB CEO Employment(2).pdf" which contains the employment agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. (P-01)
7. On 12/23/2025 at 2:29 PM the defendant sends back the employment agreement with their signature (P-01)
8. On 12/23/2025 at 2:34 PM RiggoSoft on behalf of Oakridge Community Bank and himself as the successor Chief Executive Officer sign the agreement and send it back to the defendant. (P-01)
9. RiggoSoft begins sending all documents required by the defendant as specified within the agreement (P-01)
10. On 12/23/2025 at 3:05 PM RiggoSoft transfer the in game DB to the defendant and completes their contractual obligations. (P-01)
12. On 12/27/2025 at 8:23 PM the defendant opens a ticket with Department of Commerce (P-02)
13. On 12/28/2025 at 12:37 AM the defendant is informed by flooristired on behalf of the Department of Commerce that there were compliance issues. (P-02)
14. On 12/28/2025 at 4:11 AM the defendant says in the ticket with the Department of Commerce "I got lied to bro said the company had no legal issues" (P-02)
15. On 12/28/2025 at 4:14 AM the defendant says in the same ticket with the Department of Commerce "Sorry not legal problems[...] I asked them to be clear with all the issues and never heard about this otherwise I wouldn't have bought it" (For context and clarity reasons the defendant had never purchased any part of the bank from RiggoSoft nor was he given any ownership with his employment agreement) (P-02)
16 . On 12/28/2025 at 4:17 AM flooristired on behalf of the DOC responds in the ticket with "its probably because they didn't think that their reporting of their assets and liabilities, and the problems that were identified by the DOC with their statements were issues"
(P-02)
17. On 1/20/2026 at 11:35 AM DiehardDave a potential customer of the plaintiff asks regarding if they may open a company account with the plaintiff for the company The Royal Institute (P-03)
18. The defendant responds at 11:35 AM with "No cannot" (P-03)
19. The potential customer asks "why?" at 11:35 AM (P-03)
20. The defendant responds at 11:40 AM with "We aren't taking any new accounts" in a separate message they say "I was lied to when I first joined as the CEO" (P-03)
21. The potential customer asks "[...] when you'd be open to new accounts" at 11:44 AM (P-03)
22. The defendant responds with "Wont' be" at 11:45 AM (P-03)
23. The potential customer asks "indefinitely?" at 11:45 AM (P-03)
24. The defendant closes the ticket at 11:46 AM (P-03)
25. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM RiggoSoft, acting on behalf of the board of directors of Oakridge Community Bank posts a motion to remove the defendant from the position of Chief Executive Officer. As the sole director of the board of directors the motion passes and the defendant is removed from the position. (P-04)
26. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM RiggoSoft, acting on behalf of the board of directors of Oakridge Community Bank, informs the defendant that they are relieved of their duties as Chief Executive Officer. (P-01)
27. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM the defendant responds in the discord thread where the motion to remove happened and sends "Nice", and sends "You lied to me I just want you to acknowledge you did and I’ll move on with my day" (P-04)
III. Claims for Relief
Due to the time of the actions these charges are brought through the No More Defamation Act
Count #1 Slander
The defendant had told individuals multiple times that the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had lied to them about the bank's condition and offers this as an excuse for them neglecting their duties. The defendant tells individuals this as it is a proven fact although the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had not lied to them.
Specifically the defendant had told a potential customer of the bank DiehardDave that RiggoSoft had lied to them as established in fact #20. The defendant falsely told the DOC the plaintiff had lied to them as well established in fact #14 The defendant had also alleged this in a discord channel open to all members of the board of directors of the bank in fact #27.
Count #2 Defamation
The defendant had told individuals such as potential clients of a business that the plaintiff had a large ownership in and worked for that they had lied to them which resulted in the plaintiff's reputation being harmed (See fact #20).
The defendant had also told individuals apart of the Department of Commerce - whom are collegaues of the plaintiff, and also have extreme power over the plaintiff as the plaintiff owns multiple business that the plaintiff- had lied to them which had resulted in the plaintiff's reputation being harmed. (See fact #14)
IV. Prayer for Relief
1. $50,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendants slander of the plaintiff as established by count #1.
2. $20,000 in Compensatory Damages for the defendants loss of reputation with customers and the Department of Commerce as established in count #2.
3. 30% of all damages awarded as Legal Fees. Paid to RiggoSoft.
4. A written apology from the defendant addressed to the plaintiff for the defendant's slander admitting it was wrong and harmful.
V. Evidence
Attached, dim_06_page_1[1].html.pdf
Attached, transcript-closed-0024.html.pdf
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 23 day of Feburary 2026