- Thread Author
- #1
Motion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
REQUEST FOR INJUNCTION
Given the inherent conflict of interest between the Attorney General and a claim against the Commonwealth given the allegations, I humbly request an injunction barring the Attorney General from representing the Commonwealth or any of elected official personally be granted.
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Redmont Civil Liberties Union [Represented by Muggy21]
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont, Dearev (in his or her Official Capacity)
Defendants
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Redmont Civil Liberties Union (“RCLU”) [Plaintiff]
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont [Defendant]
3. Dearev, in his or her Official Capacity [Defendant]
II. FACTS
1. The RCLU is in part a political organization engaging in constitutionally protected activity.
2. Muggy21 is the leader and primary spokesperson for the RCLU.
3.Defendent, dearev, is the Attorney General of the Commonwealth.
4. As Acting Attorney General, it is within his or her purview to uphold the Constitution and to ensure equal protection under the law across the citizenry.
5. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:18:24 EST, Muggy21 launched an advertisement that stated the following “AD » Police falsely arrested you? Let the RCLU know! - Muggy21”
6. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:28:21 EST, Muggy21 engaged in politically protected speech by inquiring to the financial condition of a fellow citizen.
7. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:31:00, Muggy21 was at spawn interacting with the local population, engaging in the same protected speech.
8. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:31:04 EST Dearev, approached Muggy21 with the intent of causing bodily harm. Shortly thereafter, Dearev unlawfully possessed a deadly weapon and caused fatal bodily injury to Muggy21.
9. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:31:06, Muggy21 was murdered, without informed explicit consent.
10. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:32:00, Muggy21 returned to spawn to continue politically protected speech.
11. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:32:01, Dearev continued his campaign of intimidation by unlawfully possessing a deadly weapon and causing severe bodily injury to Muggy21.
12. On August 11th, 2025, at 19:32:06, Dearev intimidated Muggy21 by stating “i need ur head.”
13. On August 11th, 2025 at 19:35:08, dearev fled the jurisdiction.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
A. Organizational Standing
- The RCLU is an organization that advocates for the civil rights of Redmontonians and regularly engages in outreach, education, and litigation in appropriate public forums.
- The Acting Attorney General, via this violent attack and retaliation, has a) had chilling effect (not the punishment) on the RCLU’s constitutionally protected speech and advocacy, (b) forced diversion of the organization’s mission to defend its freedoms.
- The RCLU’s outreach and advertisements constituted core political communication and peaceful assembly, as protected under Part IV: §6 Freedom of Political Communication; §10 Freedom of the Press and Media; §11 Freedom of Peaceful Assembly; §12 Freedom of Association; (also see xLayzur & Krix v. Politico [2023] FCR 62)
- Acting under the color of state authority, with his or her flagrant disregard for the law, were intended to deter, punish and chill said protected expression and association..
- The Commonwealth is responsible for the general welfare of the people and its generally responsible for compliance with the Constitution. The Acting Attorney General, as a member of the Government, shares in this responsibility.
C. Equal Protection Discrimination
- The Acting Attorney General targeted the RCLU’s leader because of its organizational viewpoint and political activity.
- Differential, violent treatment based on political belief is unconstitutional under Part IV: §6 Freedom of Political Communication;
- The RCLU, primarily controlled by a law-abiding citizen of the Commonwealth, is an apparatus of a citizen’s rights under the Constitution; Therefore, violating the rights of the RCLU, violates the rights of the citizen.
- The Acting Attorney General’s use of physical violence, in a color of authority action, to suppress protected political communication at a public forum is ultra vires.
- By definition, conduct that violates Part IV §§6, 10–12, 13, and 14 is not “execution” of law; it is an abandonment of office and cannot be cloaked in sovereign immunity for purposes of prospective relief; in the alternative, Plaintiff asserts that Sovereign Immunity can’t cover an action not explicitly authorized by law or edict.
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A declaratory judgment that Dearev acted unconstitutionally and unlawfully stifled legitimate political speech.
2. A declaratory judgment that permits political organizations to assert violations of law impact it directly, without the need for citizen inclusion in litigation.
3. A judgment of a monetary award for damages, where said damages may be compensatory, punitive, consequential, or in the alternative, nominal damages.
4. A judgement of a monetary award for legal fees as permitted under the Legal Damages Act.
5. Plaintiff does not reasonable expect this allegation to rise above the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court.
Evidence:
Chat Logs (P-001)
[19:18:24] [Render thread/INFO]: [System] [CHAT] - Pastebin.com
Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time.
Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games
Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.
Witnesses: Dearev
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of August, 2025.
Proof of Representation is moot, I'm the leader of the RCLU.
