Lawsuit: In Session Rawrrae69 v. Djayden0807 [2026] DCR 54

[game_proo]

rawrrae69 (repersented by game_proo)
Prosecution

v.

Djayden0807
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
As known in this city many things stand one of those are the illegality of drugs. another thing is attempted murder and threats.
The defendant broke those laws and added on emotional damages WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I entered my house to grab something but found the defendant in my apartment standing there. i ask him why he's there and he states the door was unlocked. he then proceeds to try to sell illegal substances too me. i declined then he attempted to shoot me. I killed him in self-defense.

I. PARTIES
rawrrae69
Djayden0807

II. FACTS
1. On 05/26/26 the plaintiff entered there apartment to find the defendant in his apartment 2. The plaintiff questioned the defendant on why he was in his home. 3. The defendant stated the door was open. 4. The defendant tried to sell illegal substances to the plaintiff while threatening him. 5. The defendant attacked the plaintiff after the plaintiff refused the offer of drugs.
III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. Illicit Substance Possession (Criminal terminology act)
2. Illicit Substance Trafficking (Criminal terminology act)
3. Attempted Murder

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
60 min jail time A search of his property to find more illegal items, 10k in emotional damage


(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

proof i am rawrrae69's lawyer

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 26/05/2026

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING

To have standing to pursue a case, a plaintiff is required to show all of the following:

1. [The plaintiff s]uffered some injury caused by a clear second party; or is affected by an application of law.
2. The cause of injury was against the law.
3. Remedy is applicable under relevant law that can be granted by a favorable decision.

(Rule 2.1).

The District Court, upon examination of the Complaint, is concerned that the Plaintiff may lack standing to pursue this case. In particular, the Court is concerned as to the third prong of standing. In particular, the Court is concerned that the prayers for relief seek the Court to jail the Defendant and to grant emotional damages. The Court does not see why these would be available in a civil case between private parties.

The Court may issue a sua sponte dismissal for failure to demonstrate standing (Rule 2.2). The Supreme Court has held that a "non-moving party must be allowed to respond to a movant’s dispositive motion, unless the presiding judge plans to dispose of the motion without response" (In re [2026] FCR 8 | [2026] SCR 8). While the Court may take action of its own hand to dismiss cases, the Court finds it just and proper to permit Plaintiff to respond to the Court's concerns prior to a final order being entered.

Plaintiff is therefore ordered to show cause, within 48 hours of the time of this post, as to whether the pleaded two prayers for relief are (1) available under the law; and (2) sufficient to meet the third element of standing.

In the District Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

 

[game_proo]

I am so sorry to waste your time but I would like to close this case on the behalf of the plaintiffs request