Pepecuu v. JavaGrace [2025] FCR 40

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pepecuu

Citizen
Court Clerk
Deputy Speaker of the House
Representative
Congressional Staff
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
Change Maker Statesman 5th Anniversary
Pepecuu
Pepecuu
Court Clerk
Joined
Jan 3, 2025
Messages
119

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Pepecuu

Plaintiff

V.

JavaGrace
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Defendant failed to fully repay a mortgage loan to the Plaintiff within the agreed-upon timeline, committing Breach of Contract, and the loan has defaulted. As of the case filing, the Defendant has failed to respond to the Plaintiff's communications regarding the absence of payments.

For the convenience of the Court, a copy of the signed contract has been attached.

I. PARTIES
1. Pepecuu (Plaintiff)
2. JavaGrace (Defendant)

II. FACTS
  1. On the 21st of February, 2025, the Plaintiff sent a Mortgage agreement to the Defendant, and the Defendant signed. This Mortgage agreement stipulated that the Defendant would be loaned a sum of $60,000, and that the total required amount to be repaid would be $81,600.
  2. On the 21st of February, 2025, the Plaintiff paid a sum of $60,000 to the Defendant in-game, as outlined in the mortgage agreement.
  3. On the 22nd of February, 2025, the Defendant made a $13,600 payment, paying the first installment in full.
  4. The remaining amount of $68,000 has not been paid, and the contract is in default as of May 4th.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. The Defendant has committed Breach of Contract under §7 of the Contracts Act, as they have failed to pay the remaining $68,000 on the loan.
  2. The Defendant has failed to give a reason or even respond to the Plaintiff's message regarding the absence of payments, despite numerous attempts to communicate with the Defendant regarding the payment of the 2nd installment.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
  1. $68,000 in Compensatory Damages for the full remaining loan amount.
  2. $30,000 in Punitive damages for the outrageous conduct of the creation of a contract, in which the Plaintiff completed their end of the bargain, while the Defendant failed to pay or provide any reason for not paying for the installment as agreed-upon by both parties.
  3. $29,400 in Legal fees as a pro se litigant, equal to 30% of the case value, as stipulated by §9 of the Legal Damages Act.

V. EVIDENCE
1746385197501.png
1746385212685.png
1746385354608.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 4th day of May 2025.

 

Attachments

Writ of Summons

@JavaGrace is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Pepecuu v. JavaGrace [2025] FCR 40.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


The Defendant has failed to appear before the court for over 72 hours after the posted writ of summons. The Plaintiff thereby motions for a default judgment based on the established facts of the case.

 

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


The Defendant has failed to appear before the court for over 72 hours after the posted writ of summons. The Plaintiff thereby motions for a default judgment based on the established facts of the case.

Given the Defendant is considered legally inactive - with 0s of playtime in the last 30 days, they qualify for a public defender. Public Defenders are given a deadline of 72 hours to make themselves known. Summary judgement will not be granted at this time.
 
Public Defender is ready to Defend the Public your honor.
 
Your honor, the parties involved has reached a settlement agreement, but require the court order the transfer of funds. The agreement is as follows:

1. The Defendant transfers the sum of $68,000 to the Plaintiff, which the court would order through the fine and undone process.
 
Your honor, the parties involved has reached a settlement agreement, but require the court order the transfer of funds. The agreement is as follows:

1. The Defendant transfers the sum of $68,000 to the Plaintiff, which the court would order through the fine and undone process.
The Plaintiff agrees to the settlement stated above.
 
If both parties are in agreement, so be it. Case is dismissed with prejudice, as both parties have settled outside of court. The settlement shall be executed by DHS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top