Lawsuit: Pending People for the Ninth Amendment v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] FCR 44

Cat Oakridge

Citizen
TheVeryBoredCat
TheVeryBoredCat
Joined
May 24, 2026
Messages
1

Case Filing



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


People for the Ninth Amendment (Class Action Group Represented by Serenity Law Services)
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Homeland Security
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

People for the Ninth Amendment bring this action against the Department of Homeland Security for

1. falsely imprisoning plaintiffs,
2. causing emotional distress, and
3. violating the 9th Amendment of the Redmont Constitution, (9) Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judicial Officer, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of legally qualified counsel for their defence.
[/LIST]
All arrested on the 24th of May, 2026, plaintiffs were fined and sent to prison for 20 minutes without a trial by DHS officer Awesomeness_Boy.

The Criminal Code Act permits judicial officers to punish summary offences without the accused being given their right to a speedy and fair trial, and without being confronted with the evidence against them. This is a clear violation of the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution.

I. PARTIES
1. itzrealmerk (Plaintiff)
2. 3mkTalal (Plaintiff)
3. nether_fish5001 (Plaintiff)
4. Department of Homeland Security (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. Plaintiffs were each arrested on May 24, 2026 for Bank Robbery by police officer Awesomeness_Boy.
2. Plaintiffs were subsequently fined and sentenced to 20 minutes in prison the same day.
3. Plaintiffs did not receive any sort of trial prior to imprisonment.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Defendant clearly violated The Ninth Amendment, threatening the core right to a fair trial after being charged with a crime.
2. Defendant violated the Miranda Warning Act, as none of the plaintiffs were informed of their right to remain silent during or before their arrests.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $90,000 per plaintiff for being denied the right to a fair and speedy trial.
2. $40,000 per plaintiff for false imprisonment.
3. $15,000 per plaintiff for not having their Miranda Warnings read in accordance with the Miranda Warning Act.
4. $30,000 per plaintiff for emotional damages.
5. 40% of the value of this case in legal fees.

V. EVIDENCE

1779682650904.png

1779682688561.png

1779682753950.png


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 25 day of May 2026

1779682314656.png

 
Back
Top