Lawsuit: Dismissed Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 117

Status
Not open for further replies.

MaxvEtten

Citizen
MaxvEtten
MaxvEtten
Attorney
Joined
Jun 3, 2026
Messages
23

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Oakridge Credit Line
Plaintiff

v.

Zombie_Bro_
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 23th of April, the Plaintiff, Oakridge Credit Line, handed out a loan worth $5,000 to the Defendant, Zombie_Bro_, they agreed that he would pay back $9,600 on the 18th of May. The Defendant ingored any requests for the money to be returned, and the Plaintiff has not yet recieved a single payment. Futhermore tjaisnice also filed a case against the Defendant, for the same reason (See: Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 81) however it was dismissed without prejudice, so the case is being filed again.

I. PARTIES

1. Oakridge Credit Line, Plaintiff
2. Zombie_Bro_, Defendant
3. MaxvEtten, legal representative for Plaintiff (Proof below)

II. FACTS

1. On the 23th of April, the Plaintiff gave a loan to the Defendant worth $5,000.
2. The Plaintiff presented a contract, which the Defendant replied with "I agree".
3. The contract stated that the inital $5,000 would be returned, with $3,600 in interest, and $1,000 in application fees. Creating a total amount of $9,600.
4. The contract stated that the full amount would be returned on May the 18th.
5. Despite multiplpe messages, the Defendant failed to pay on time, and the Defendant ignored any messages attempting to reach him.
6. Previously, on the 9th of June tjaisnice also filed a case against the Defendant for the same incident, however it was dismissed without prejudice ( Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 81).
7. The Defendant's failure to pay caused financial harm to the Plaintiff.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Claim I: Compensatory Damages

1. The Plaintiff seeks Compensatory Damages, in the amount of $9,600 for the value of the withheld payment.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief against the Defendant:
1. $9,600 in Compensatory Damages.
2. Any late fees the court finds just and proper.
3. Any applicable legal fees awarded to the prevailing party.
4. Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: The contract presented to the Defendant by the Plaintiff.
SEE ATTACHMENT: "INDIVIDUAL LOAN AGREEMENT"

P-002: A screenshot from a Disocord chat, showing that the Defendant agreed to the presented contract.

1781715214612.png

P-003: A screenshot from a Discord chat, showing that the Plaintiff requested for the money to be returned, which was ignored.
1781715294018.png


1781715360883.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 17th day of June 2026

 

Attachments

Your Honor,

My client informed me I made a slight mistake in the filing of this case. I was under the impression that the $3,600 I mentioned were interest for the $5,000. However my client informed me that I was mistaken as the $3,600 was outstanding debt the Defendant already accumulated with The Oakridge Credit Line. My sincere apologies for this mistake. I respectfully request to amend my case filing accordingly.

Dated: This 17th day of June, 2026
 

Writ of Summons



@Zombie_Bro_ is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Oakridge Credit Line v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 117.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top