- Joined
- Aug 21, 2025
- Messages
- 226
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Oakridge Community Bank
&
RiggoSoft
Plaintiffs
v.
dimitre977
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs complains against the Defendant as follows:
Written Statement
I. Parties
1. Oakridge Community Bank (Co-Plaintiff)
2. dimitre977 (Defendant)
3. RiggoSoft (Co-Plaintiff, Chief Executive Officer prior to defendant's appointment, referred to as successor)
4. DiehardDave (Potential customer of the Plaintiff)
II. Facts
All dates are formatted mm/dd/yyyy and times are formatted 12:00 in the Eastern Standard Time time zone
1. On 12/22/2025 at 1:34 PM the defendant contacts the plaintiff regarding a job listing posted by the plaintiff regarding the role of Chief Executive Officer of the plaintiff.
2. The defendant and the plaintiff continue to talk about the job the defendant is inquiring for, the requirements and potential for compensation.
3. On 12/22/2025 at 7:22 PM the defendant asks "Ok is the bank in any financial trouble and do I have to take care of the government aspect?"
4. On 12/22/2025 at 7:31 PM the plaintiff responds "Yes you have to take care of the government aspect"
5. The defendant and the plaintiff keep discussing the conditions of the job and the specifics of the agreement.
6. On 12/23/2025 at 2:12 PM the plaintiff sends the defendant a file titled "OCB CEO Employment(2).pdf" which contains the employment agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
7. On 12/23/2025 at 2:29 PM the defendant sends back the employment agreement with their signature
8. On 12/23/2025 at 2:34 PM RiggoSoft on behalf of Oakridge Community Bank and himself as the successor Chief Executive Officer sign the agreement and send it back to the defendant.
9. RiggoSoft begins sending all documents required by the defendant as specified within the agreement
10. On 12/23/2025 at 3:05 PM RiggoSoft transfer the in game DB to the defendant and completes their contractual obligations.
12. On 12/27/2025 at 8:23 PM the defendant opens a ticket with Department of Commerce
13. On 12/28/2025 at 12:37 AM the defendant is informed by flooristired on behalf of the Department of Commerce that there were compliance issues.
14. On 12/28/2025 at 4:11 AM the defendant says in the ticket with the Department of Commerce "I got lied to bro said the company had no legal issues"
16. On 12/25/2025 at 4:14 AM the defendant says in the same ticket with the Department of Commerce "Sorry not legal problems[...] I asked them to be clear with all the issues and never heard about this otherwise I wouldn't have bought it" (For context and clarity reasons the defendant had never purchased any part of the bank from the co-plaintiff RiggoSoft nor was he given any ownership with his employment agreement)
17. On 1/7/2026 the plaintiff's monthly financial reports are due to the Department of Commerce for compliance. These reports are for the month of December.
18. On 1/7/2026 the defendant does not submit the required monthly financial report due to the Department of Commerce
19. On 1/18/2026 at 6:17 PM the Department of Commerce informs sends a message stating "@Dimitre just letting you know that OCB is now behind 3 months on financial reporting for November, December, and January as a heads up, OCB is likely at risk of your tax exemption status being suspended by the DOC a week from this notice"
20. At 6:18 PM the defendant responds with "Ok" acknowledging they have seen the message and understand the notice.
21. The defendant does not inform shareholders or board members of the risk that the bank is in regarding its tax exemption status.
22. On 1/20/2026 at 11:35 AM DiehardDave a potential customer of the plaintiff asks regarding if they may open a company account with the plaintiff for the company The Royal Institute
23. The defendant responds at 11:35 AM with "No cannot"
24. The potential customer asks "why?" at 11:35 AM
25. The defendant responds at 11:40 AM with "We aren't taking any new accounts" in a separate message they say "I was lied to when I first joined as the CEO"
26. The potential customer asks "[...] when you'd be open to new accounts" at 11:44 AM
27. The defendant responds with "Wont' be" at 11:45 AM
28. The potential customer asks "indefinitely?" at 11:45 AM
29. The defendant closes the ticket at 11:46 AM
30. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM RiggoSoft, acting on behalf of the board of directors of the plaintiff, posts a motion to remove the defendant from the position of Chief Executive Officer. As the sole director of the board of directors the motion passes and the defendant is removed from the position.
31. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM RiggoSoft, acting on behalf of the board of directors of the plaintiff, informs the defendant that they are relieved of their duties as Chief Executive Officer.
32. On 1/20/2026 at 11:52 AM the defendant responds in the discord thread where the motion to remove happened and sends "Nice", and sends "You lied to me I just want you to acknowledge you did and I’ll move on with my day"
III. Claims for Relief
Count #1 Breach of Contract (Part VI §1 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
The defendant has violated their employment agreement with the plaintiff (Oakridge Community Bank). The defendant had willfully signed an employment contract with the plaintiff on 12/23/2025 that outlined all contractual obligations to the defendant that included but were not limited to banking, approval and denial of loans, and government compliance.
Since the time the defendant was employed with the bank the defendant had not allowed potential customers to deposit money into the bank violating their agreement with the plaintiff. Additionally the defendant had not submitted the required monthly report to the Department of Commerce that was due to them on 1/7/2026 for the month of December specifically violating their agreement with the plaintiff.
Count #2 Failure to Deliver Goods or Services (Part VI §4 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
As established in Count #1 the defendant was hired by the defendant to become the new Chief Executive Officer of the plaintiff (Oakridge Community Bank). In that agreement the defendant had agreed to all duties of the Chief Executive Officer that included remaining compliant with the Department of Commerce.
By the defendant not submitting the required monthly financial report to the Department of Commerce the defendant has failed to deliver the service of maintaining compliance on behalf of the plaintiff (Oakridge Community Bank) that they had agreed to in their employment agreement.
Count #3 Negligence (Part XII §3 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
The defendant had agreed to be hired as the Chief Executive Officer of the plaintiff (Oakridge Community Bank) and had been bestowed the duty to act and make decisions on behalf of the plaintiff to keep them compliant with the Department of Commerce as established in count #1.
The defendant had neglected this duty to keep the plaintiff (Oakridge Community Bank) compliant with the Department of Commerce.
Count #4 Malicious Allegation (Part XII §5 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
The defendant in multiple instances has told individuals that the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had lied to them. When they mean lie they are referring to the defendant lying about the bank's condition and simultaneously alleging that the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had committed misrepresentation (Part VI §2 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
Specifically the defendant had told a potential customer of the bank DiehardDave that RiggoSoft had lied to them as established in fact #16. The defendant had also alleged this in a discord channel open to all members of the board of directors of the bank in fact #23.
Count #5 Slander (Part V §3 according to Redmont Civil Code Act)
The defendant had told individuals multiple times that the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had lied to them about the bank's condition and offers this as an excuse for them neglecting their duties. The defendant tells individuals this as it is a proven fact although the plaintiff (RiggoSoft) had not lied to them.
Specifically the defendant had told a potential customer of the bank DiehardDave that RiggoSoft had lied to them as established in fact #16. The defendant had also alleged this in a discord channel open to all members of the board of directors of the bank in fact #23.
IV. Prayer for Relief
1. $40,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant violating their contract with the plaintiff. Paid to Oakridge Community Bank
2. $20,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant failing to deliver the services they were contracted to do. Paid to Oakridge Community Bank
3. $60,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant's negligence and neglect of their actions that has ultimately lost the plaintiff's tax exempt status. Paid to Oakridge Community Bank
4. $20,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant's malicious allegations against the plaintiff. Paid to RiggoSoft
5. $20,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant's slander against the plaintiff. Paid to RiggoSoft
6. $2,500 in Compensatory Damages to repay the plaintiff the compensation given to the defendant for the duties they were obligated to do that were not fulfilled. Paid to Oakridge Community Bank.
7. $7,500 in Nominal Damages if no other damages are awarded. $3,750 awarded to RiggoSoft, $3,750 awarded to Oakridge Community Bank.
8. 30% of all damages awarded as Legal Fees. Paid to RiggoSoft.
V. Evidence
Will be attached after post is sent
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12 day of Feburary 2026