Lawsuit: In Session MrFluffy2U94 v. Commonwealth of Redmont

[Dartanboy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

If the Plaintiff's plots are seized prematurely it will cause irreversible harm as the plot(s) would have been transferred to another Player.

We ask that any seizures resulting from the Plot Regulations Act are postponed until after this case is adjourned.

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

MrFluffy2U94 (Justice Compass Law Firm representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Plaintiff, MrFluffy2U94, was enjoying his time in Redmont. Suddenly, the Commonwealth of Redmont passed a new law – the Plot Regulations Act – which seeks to strip away some of his property and forcibly give it to others.

This is the very type of situation which the Constitutional Right against Unreasonable Seizure exists to prevent.

I. PARTIES
1. MrFluffy2U94 (Plaintiff)
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. MrFluffy2U94 owns more than 30 c-plots [Exhibit P-001].
2. The Plot Regulations Act (Act of Congress - Plot Regulations Act) states the following:

(1) Upon the enactment of this bill, all persons who exceed the new limit on commercial properties will be required to put properties up for auction until they are within the new limit. These auctions must be public.
(2) If an individual has failed to auction off enough properties to be within the new limit within three weeks after the enactment of this bill, the Department of Construction and Transportation shall be charged with confiscating and auctioning properties from that individual until the limit is met. The Department shall have the sole discretion to decide which properties to confiscate, but shall aim to confiscate land that is not in active use, if at all possible.

3. The Constitution (Government - Constitution) states the following:

(15) Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Constitutional Right – Every citizen has the right to be secure against unreasonable seizure.

The Plaintiff, MrFluffy2U94, has lawfully obtained all of his properties, and the Government is now seeking to force him off of these plots to give them to other players. This constitutes an unreasonable seizure.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Plot Regulations Act be struck as unconstitutional.
2. The Government provide an announcement apologizing for the unconstitutional law.
3. $7,500 in Nominal Damages payable to MrFluffy2U94, per the Legal Damages Act.
4. $6,000 in Legal Fees payable to the business JusticeCompass, per the Legal Damages Act.

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: ”Exhibit P-001”

Consent to Represent:

Spoiler: Consent

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 5th day of May 2025

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Writ of Summons

@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of MrFluffy2U94 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Commonwealth, with all its resources, has failed to appear.

We request a Default Judgement.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Your Honor, I did not get this ping and was unaware of this case. I also had finals in Swedish, English, and Spanish this week, so I only checked my pings. I respectfully request permission to submit a late answer to the complaint.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your Honor, I did not get this ping and was unaware of this case. I also had finals in Swedish, English, and Spanish this week, so I only checked my pings. I respectfully request permission to submit a late answer to the complaint.

Objection

Breach of Procedure

This is neither an Objection nor Motion, and has no place in a lawsuit.

Furthermore, Freeze is not the only member of the DoJ, surely someone else could have handled this.

There is simply no excuse for the Commonwealth to miss this.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Response

Objection

Breach of Procedure

This is neither an Objection nor Motion, and has no place in a lawsuit.

Furthermore, Freeze is not the only member of the DoJ, surely someone else could have handled this.

There is simply no excuse for the Commonwealth to miss this.

This is neither an objection nor a motion, as there is no existing objection or motion that fits this scenario. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to appear on behalf of the Commonwealth, which I was unable to do for the reasons previously stated. I respectfully ask that the Court allow a late appearance and permit the immediate submission of the answer to complaint.