Lawsuit: Dismissed Maybehim_ v. LILTOST3527 [2026] DCR 121

[Maybehim_]

Date July 9, 2026


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff: Maybehim_

v. Defendant: LILTOST3527


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

I. PARTIES

1. Maybehim_ (Plaintiff)

2. LILTOST3527 (Defendant)

3. Alexdabest15 (Witness)

II. FACTS

1. On July 9, 2026, at 10:14 PM Server Time (0:06 in video), the Plaintiff was conducting a business transaction via private message when the Defendant initiated an unprovoked physical assault.

2. In response to the immediate threat, the Plaintiff retreated and discharged four 9mm rounds from a Glock 17 in self-defense, forcing the Defendant to flee into a non-PvP zone at 0:15.

3. At 10:18 PM Server Time (0:27 in video), the Defendant exited the safe zone and attempted to assault the Plaintiff a second time.

4. At 0:43 in the video, after the second attempt failed, the Defendant proceeded to launch an unprovoked attack against an innocent third party, Alexdabest15.

5. At 0:47 in the video, in defense of the third party, the Plaintiff discharged multiple rounds and ultimately neutralized the active threat using a diamond axe.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF / VIOLATIONS

1. Assault / Attempted Murder: The Defendant initiated an unprovoked and illegal physical attack on the Plaintiff.

2. Disturbance of Peace / Assault on a Third Party: The Defendant actively pursued and attacked an innocent bystander outside of the safe zone.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF (DAMAGES)

1. $1,500 for Emotional Distress and disruption of business operations.

2. $2,000 for Punitive Damages regarding the unprovoked assault.

3. Total Demanded: $3,500

V. EVIDENCE

Video Footage: https://medal.tv/games/minecraft/clips/n541Q5kFfG_276jqu?invite=cr-MSxybzcsNjQ3MzEzOTEw

 

[Dartanboy]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING

"Standing consists of three elements. First, the individual must have suffered an injury caused by a clearly identifiable second party or affected by an application of law. Second, the cause of the injury must be unlawful. Third, the injury must be capable of being remedied by a favorable decision under the relevant law" ([2025] SCR 19).

The Court is concerned that the Plaintiff has not shown a legal injury that can be remedied by a favorable decision under relevant law.

The Court requires the Plaintiff to address this concern within 48 hours.

 

[Maybehim_]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING

"Standing consists of three elements. First, the individual must have suffered an injury caused by a clearly identifiable second party or affected by an application of law. Second, the cause of the injury must be unlawful. Third, the injury must be capable of being remedied by a favorable decision under the relevant law" ([2025] SCR 19).

The Court is concerned that the Plaintiff has not shown a legal injury that can be remedied by a favorable decision under relevant law.

The Court requires the Plaintiff to address this concern within 48 hours.

1. Injury In Fact: The Plaintiff suffered an immediate, direct civil injury through severe emotional distress and potential loss of business profits due to the disruption of a business transaction caused by the Defendant's actions./mai/.2wa

2. Unlawful Cause: The cause of the injury is entirely unlawful, violating the Legal Code regarding unprovoked physical altercations and Disturbance of the peace.

3. Capability of Remedy: The injury is fully capable of being remedied by a favorable decision from this Court through the awarding of civil damages ($3,500) to compensate for the emotional and commercial impact suffered.

 

[Dartanboy]

Court Order

The court has decided to dismiss this case with prejudice sua sponte as the Plaintiff has failed to provide a legal authority establishing the cause of injury as illegal or alleging that any application of law would find in favor of them (beyond the "Legal Code" - which could refer to any and every law on the books) and failed to specify any legal authority which would allow for the damages requested.