Lawsuit: Adjourned MAXXXMAXXX v. swiftsounds [2026] DCR 187

[gamerpizzaplayz]

Case Filing

MAXXXMAXXX (represented by pizza at law)
plaintiff
V.
swiftsounds
defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

they [swiftsounds] never said anything about resigning, yet suddenly, they left the server and I was either blocked or they turned off messages from not friends

I. parties
1. MAXXXMAXXX (plaintiff)
2. swiftsounds (defendant)

II. facts
1. swiftsounds signed a contract with MAXXXMAXXX on august 5th as an employee
2. swiftsounds left the company without giving his 48hr notice

III. claims for relief
1.according to section 4 of the contracts act my client and the defendant met all of the requirements to enter into a contract which are offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
2. as stated in section 7 clause 1 of the contracts Act "A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations." the defendant did not fulfil their contractual obligations in the form of giving my client the required 48 hour notice noted in section 2 clause 8 of the provided contract
3. the contract that both parties signed had a clear monetary resolution to all offences that happened

IV. prayers for relief
We are asking for the following:
16,000 in compensatory damages for breach of contract

Exhibit P-001: signed contract

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

(

)

Exhibit P-002: evidence of no contact

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

(

)

Exhibit P-003: evidence of no contact

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

(

)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This (8th) day of (October) (2026)

 

[Johnes]

I will be the PO in this case.

 

[Johnes]

MAXXXMAXXX (represented by pizza at law)
prosecution
V.
swiftsounds
defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
they [swiftsounds] never said anything about resigning, yet suddenly, they left the server and I was either blocked or they turned off messages from not friends

I. parties
1. MAXXXMAXXX (prosecution)
2. swiftsounds (defendant)

II. facts
1. swiftsounds signed a contract with MAXXXMAXXX on august 5th as an employee
2. swiftsounds left the company without giving his 48hr notice

III. claims for relief
1.according to section 4 of the contracts act my client and the defendant met all of the requirements to enter into a contract which are offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
2. as stated in section 7 clause 1 of the contracts Act "A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations." the defendant did not fulfil their contractual obligations in the form of giving my client the required 48 hour notice noted in section 2 clause 8 of the provided contract
3. the contract that both parties signed had a clear monetary resolution to breach of contract

IV. prayers for relief
We are asking for the following:
16,000 - breach of contract

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This (8th) day of (october) (2026)

Please amend the complaint to be compliant with the Court Rules, especially in the following areas:
a) correct labeling of evidence;
b) correct labeling of parties; and
c) correct categorization of damages; the Court does not recognized "16,000 - breach of contract" to be a cognizable remedy.

Do so within 48 hours.

 

[Johnes]

pizza at law sucks, unprofessional

Stricken.

I find @UntitledSteve in contempt of Court and is to be jailed for 10 mins with a 5 penalty unit fine.

 

[gamerpizzaplayz]

Please amend the complaint to be compliant with the Court Rules, especially in the following areas:
a) correct labeling of evidence;
b) correct labeling of parties; and
c) correct categorization of damages; the Court does not recognized "16,000 - breach of contract" to be a cognizable remedy.

Do so within 48 hours.

Your honor, could you please elaborate on what I did wrong for letter "B"? Thank you in advance. (I think it is all fixed now)

 

[Johnes]

Your honor, could you please elaborate on what I did wrong for letter "B"? Thank you in advance. (I think it is all fixed now)

I'll direct you here.

 

[Johnes]

Writ of Summons

@SwiftIsDoingSounds is hereby commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of MAXXXMAXXX v. swiftsounds [2026] DCR 187.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Johnes]

Writ of Summons

@SwiftIsDoingSounds is hereby commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of MAXXXMAXXX v. swiftsounds [2026] DCR 187.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

I apologizes for having missed this.

Defendant failed to appear.

Noting Defendant's prolonged absence from Redmont, the Court will continue in an inquest. See Rule 3.6.1 of the Court Rules & Procedures.

The deadline to file a Motion to Vacate Default shall be set 7 days from now, the 23rd of October 2026 pursuant to Rule 3.6.3.

The following is the structure of the inquest proceeding:
a) discovery in full, unless Plaintiff moves to end it early;
b) witness testimony; and
c) a legal brief submitted by Plaintiff.

Discovery is open for 5 days.

 

[gamerpizzaplayz]

Exhibit P-001: signed contract

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

(View attachment 101646)

the preceding evidence is a signed contract signed both by my client (plaintiff) and the defendant on august 5th, 2026. This contract is a standard employment contract with the following important parts.

In section 2 clause 8 it is clearly stated that the defendant must provide a 48 hour notice prior to resignation.

In section 2 clause 8 , section 3 clause 2 and 3 it clearly states momentary resolutions to various problems.

these payments stated include:

$1,000 for quitting without proper notice

$10,000 for general breach of contract

$5,000 for potential financial loss

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

(View attachment 101647)

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

(View attachment 101648)

exhibit p-002/p-003 show that the defendant made no contact that me or my client is aware of. with This it clearly shows that the defendant broke clause 8 section causing the defendant to be in breach of contract.

 

[Johnes]

Discovery elapsed, sorry for missing this.

Since no witnesses are called, we'll proceed to legal briefs. 72 h to post a final legal brief @gamerpizzaplayz

 

[Johnes]

Plaintiff submitted no legal brief. This is a warning to Plaintiff to respond within 7 days to this message or the action will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

@gamerpizzaplayz, @MAXXXMAXXX.

 

[gamerpizzaplayz]

Brief

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

On august 5th swiftsounds signed a contraction to become an employee of MAXXXMAXXX. In that contract it said that the defendant MUST give a 48 hour notice before quitting. After that contract went into effect the defendant cut off all contact with my client and quit without giving proper notice therefore breaching the contract.

 

[Johnes]

Brief

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

On august 5th swiftsounds signed a contraction to become an employee of MAXXXMAXXX. In that contract it said that the defendant MUST give a 48 hour notice before quitting. After that contract went into effect the defendant cut off all contact with my client and quit without giving proper notice therefore breaching the contract.

Thank you.

Case is in recess pending verdict.

 

[Johnes]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MAXXXMAXXX v. swiftsounds [2026] DCR 187

I. Summary of Complaint​

Plaintiff MAXXXMAXXX approached this Court regarding a breach of contract claim against Defendant swiftsounds. Plaintiff alleges Defendant breached an employment contract by failing to properly resign.

Defendant failed to appear and the Case proceeded in default judgment under an inquest proceeding.

II. Findings of Fact​

On the 5th of August, Plaintiff and Defendant signed an employment contract, wherein Defendant agreed to give a 48 hour resignation notice to Plaintiff; failure to do so would result in a $1,000 penalty. Plaintiff then attempted to reach out to Defendant on the 1st of October, which failed. It is apparent that Defendant left the server, as in the screenshot provided no servers in common are seen. This is supported by another screenshot, showing that Defendant made no effort to announce his departure. The Court will therefore assume, on a balance of probabilities, that Defendant did not communicate a resignation notice to Plaintiff.

III. Issue​

The issue in this case is whether Defendant’s abrupt resignation entitles Plaintiff to the relief sought.

IV. Rule​

Compensatory Damages are damages awarded for a cognizable loss, and they shall not be awarded without proof of pecuniary loss. Redmont Civil Code Act (“RCCA”), Part III § 2. All civil claims, apart from those specifically outlined, shall be proven on a balance of probabilities; the burden of proof rests with a plaintiff. Judicial Standards Act, Part II §§ 2 and 3. Courts will rule on and award only the relief requested. See 420mss v. Sockful [2026] DCR 103.

V. Analysis​

1. Breach of Contract​

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s failure of properly communicating a notice to resign constitutes a breach of contract and therefore Plaintiff is entitled to any damages arising from said breach. The Court agrees.

The contract is clear in its requirement of a 48-hour notice sent to the employer, Plaintiff. The absence of such a notice is evident in evidence and the Court will assume no notice was properly communicated. The breach therefore occurred and Plaintiff would be entitled to appropriate compensation. The specific compensation requested will be discussed below.

2. Damages​

To remedy the situation Plaintiff finds himself in after the breach of contract, Plaintiff requests $16,000 in Compensatory Damages, further divided to claims of “quitting without proper notice,” “general breach of contract,” and “potential financial loss.” (#9). The Court will dissect each claim in part.

The contract provides a penalty of $1,000 to an employee who fails to give proper notice when resigning. This would fall under Liquidated Damages, as outlined in Part III § 6 of the RCCA. The Court finds that Plaintiff improperly asserts Compensatory Damages. As has been stated above, the Court will not grant remedies not requested by Plaintiff and required by statute, and therefore the Court finds no grounds to grant this remedy.

Plaintiff further requests $10,000 in “general breach of contract” and $5,000 in “potential financial loss.” Both are expressly outlined in the contract as penalties. Notwithstanding the finding made above, the Court declines to grant both remedies for 2 reasons. First, Liquidated Damages are a replacement for Compensatory or Punitive Damages in cases where either would be difficult to ascertain. RCCA, Part III § 6(2). This means that Liquidated Damages must be proportional to the harm, and cannot be unilaterally and arbitrarily set. The same statute also requires for courts to consider whether the parties made the most reasonable assessment before entering the contract. Id. at § 6(3). The former claim is overly broad and the Court is not satisfied that it satisfies the proportionality requirement. Ten thousand in penalties in general is not in any way proportional and therefore the claim fails.

Second, no proof of any pecuniary loss or proof of special damages have been submitted. In order to grant Compensatory Damages, such proof is required. Absent that proof, the Court cannot grant these damages, even if they are outlined in the contract.

VI. Order of the Court​

Absent any possible relief to grant Plaintiff, the Court rules in favor of Defendant, and orders the following:

• Plaintiff is liable to Defendant in the sum of $3,000 for Legal Fees, as is the statutory floor set by Congress to award to the prevailing party.

The Court thanks all involved for their time.

So ordered,
Magistrate Johnes