Lawsuit: Pending Maxib02 V. ILatteralus [2026] DCR 32

[ThePuffer]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Maxib02
Plaintiff (Represented by ThePufferOfficial)

v.

ILatteralus
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

Maxib02 (Plaintiff) had made a deal for two certificates of incorporation from ILatteralus (Defendant), for the total price of 2,000$. The deal took effect on February 26th, 2026, a couple of weeks after the Legal Entity Act became law, with Plaintiff paying Defendant the agreed-upon sum, thus completing their end of the agreement. Plaintiff then received two certificates of incorporation from Defendant, but they have failed to meet the legal standards required by the Legal Entity Act. Though Plaintiff tried contacting Defendant numerous times, he had not received any responses from Defendant, who did not fulfill his end of the agreement

I. PARTIES
1. Maxib02 (Plaintiff)
2. ILaterus (Defendant).


II. FACTS

1. On February 7th, 2026, the “Legal Entity Act” became law within the Commonwealth of Redmont.
2. On or about the 26th of February, Plaintiff and Defendant had entered into a deal, in which Defendant is to create two Certificates of Incorporation (hereinafter referred to as COI, or the Certificates), for the total price of 2,000$ (See P-001- P-003, which shows the agreed terms of negotiation.)
3. Later that day (26th of February), Plaintiff had completed their end of the bargain, paying defendant the agreed-upon sum of 2,000$ (see P-004, which shows the proof of payment).
4. On or about the 4th of March, 2026, one of the certificates had been rejected twice,for not meeting the requirements of the Legal Entity Act. The DOC had sent the new requirements to the plaintiff, who then sent them to the defendant (see P-005).
5. From March 5th to March 17th, the plaintiff had made numerous attempts to contact Defendant, asking them to complete the requirements of the deal, but had failed to receive a response from defendant, despite them still being a player on the server, and even making contact with other players (See P-006 which shows attempts made by the plaintiff to contact defendant, and P-007 which is a conversation between Plaintiff and RiggoSoft, in which RiggoSoft made it clear they have been in contact with Defendant on the 15th of March).
6. On the the 19th of March, 2026, the Department of Commerce denied the second certificate (See P-008).

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Breach of Contract: The agreed contract between Plaintiff and Defendant had been for two COI to be made for the price of 2,000$ total. For the documents to be considered legal, Certificates of Incorporation, they must have complied with the requirements made in the Legal Entity Act, which had entered into effect before the deal had begun. Since Defendant failed to meet the requirements for the two COIs, they had failed to meet their end of the bargain, thus causing Breach of Contract.
2. Loss of Joy within the Commonwealth of Redmont: Plaintiff's numerous attempts to contact Defendant had caused loss of joy for the Plaintiff, as the time spent contacting Defendant could have been spent on other activities within Redmont.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. 2,000$ In Breach of Contract
2. 3,000$ In Loss of Joy
3. 3,600$ In Legal Fees

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 20th day of March, 2020

List of Potential Witnesses:
1. RiggoSoft (was in contact with Defendant after Defendant stopped talking to Plaintiff)
2. xXTheoryXx (Member of the DOC, and the superior officer for the Company Docket)

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

Spoiler: P-008

Spoiler: Proof of Representation

 

[ThePuffer]

May it please the court that, after talks with my client, it had come to my attention that Plaintiff had decided to pay for the two certificates of incorporation from another lawyer. As such, I would like to amend the prayer for relief to include the following:
add 5,000$ in consequental damages (which was the sum Plaintiff had to pay for another lawyer to complete the two certificates).
Should the court require, ill be more then happy to add the payment to another client as evidence.

 

[Franciscus]

Writ of Summons

@ILatteralus is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Maxib02 V. ILatteralus [2026] DCR 32

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.