Lawsuit: Pending MattisSuperstar v. teji2 [2026] DCR 189

Mimtembo

Mimtembo

Citizen
Willow Resident
Mimtembo
Mimtembo
Solicitor
Joined
Aug 10, 2026
Messages
27

Case Filing​



IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MattisSuperstar, represented by Mimtembo, a Junior Associate of Blueveggies & Olson Law FIrm
Plaintiff

v.

teji2
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF


I. PARTIES
1. MattisSuperstar, a miner and fisher from Redmont.
2. teji2, a business owner with shops in Redmont.

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th day of September, 2026, MattisSuperstar purchased a music disc labelled "The Internationale", a song written by Eugène Pottier in June of 1871.
2. The disc was purchased from a chest shop owned by teji2.
3. The disc was purchased for DC$5,000.
4. When played, the disc purchased was found to actually contain "Cat", written by Daniel Rosenfeld (a. k. a. C418.) in March of 2011.
5. Multiple attempts were made to contact the defendant to obtain either a refund or the correct disc, but none were successful.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff refers to the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.
2. This conduct by the defendant clearly violates the subsection in reference to "a: engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3: The plaintiff argues that the position he was placed in created a situation where he was mislead in connection with the supply of a good.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The plaintiff seeks a replacement of the disc, and in lieu of a replacement, a refund of DC$5,000.
2. The plaintiff also seeks the legal costs be covered for the case.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 4th day of October 2026.

Evidence:

evidence 1.png shows the chest shop where the disc was purchased
evidence 2.png shows the transaction logs after the disc was purchased
is a video link to the plaintiff's lawyer's video of the disc not playing the song that was advertised
 

Attachments

  • evidence 2.png
    evidence 2.png
    58.6 KB · Views: 39
  • evidence 1.png
    evidence 1.png
    43.1 KB · Views: 39
Last edited by a moderator:
This complaint must be amended in line with the proper template listed in Guide - Templates in order to comply with Rule 3.1. Please hyperlink all sources in line with Rule 1.10. Finally, list and label all evidence in line with Rule 4.6. This guide should help you.

The court will not consider this Complaint until it is brought in-line with the above and all other Rules and Procedures.
 

Case Filing​



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MattisSuperstar
Plaintiff

v.

teji2
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On September 27th, 2026, the plaintiff bought a music disc valued at DC$5,000 from a chest shop owned by teji2, under the impression that the disc would play "The Internationale" by Eugène Pottier. When played, the disc instead plays "Cat' by c418. The plaintiff made multiple attempts to contact the defendant, and was unable to initiate contact to either exchange the disc for one with the correct song or provide a refund. The plaintiff is seeking DC$5,000, plus coverage of legal costs.
Click to expand...


I. PARTIES
1. MattisSuperstar
2. teji2

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th day of September, 2026, MattisSuperstar purchased a music disc labelled "The Internationale", a song written by Eugène Pottier in June of 1871.
2. The disc was purchased from a chest shop owned by teji2.
3. The disc was purchased for DC$5,000.
4. When played, the disc purchased was found to actually contain "Cat", written by Daniel Rosenfeld (a. k. a. C418.) in March of 2011.
5. Multiple attempts were made to contact the defendant to obtain either a refund or the correct disc, but none were successful.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff refers to the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.
2. This conduct by the defendant clearly violates the subsection in reference to "a: engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3: The plaintiff argues that the position he was placed in created a situation where he was mislead in connection with the supply of a good.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A specific performance order to require the defendant to produce a disc containing the song "The Internationale".
2. DC$5,000 in Compensatory Damages, according to Claim II: Violation in Reference to "Engaging in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3. DC$3,000 in Legal Fees, the minimum required by the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part III Subsection 7 (d.).

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of October 2026.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: shows the transaction logs after the disc was purchased

1791660102711.png


P-002: image showing the chest shop where the plaintiff purchased the disc


1791660246917.png


P-003: video link containing the disc not playing the correct music

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mimtembo said:

Case Filing​



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MattisSuperstar
Plaintiff

v.

teji2
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF




I. PARTIES
1. MattisSuperstar
2. teji2

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th day of September, 2026, MattisSuperstar purchased a music disc labelled "The Internationale", a song written by Eugène Pottier in June of 1871.
2. The disc was purchased from a chest shop owned by teji2.
3. The disc was purchased for DC$5,000.
4. When played, the disc purchased was found to actually contain "Cat", written by Daniel Rosenfeld (a. k. a. C418.) in March of 2011.
5. Multiple attempts were made to contact the defendant to obtain either a refund or the correct disc, but none were successful.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff refers to the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.
2. This conduct by the defendant clearly violates the subsection in reference to "a: engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3: The plaintiff argues that the position he was placed in created a situation where he was mislead in connection with the supply of a good.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A specific performance order to require the defendant to produce a disc containing the song "The Internationale".
2. DC$5,000 in Compensatory Damages, according to Claim II: Violation in Reference to "Engaging in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3. DC$3,000 in Legal Fees, the minimum required by the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part III Subsection 7 (d.).

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of October 2026.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: shows the transaction logs after the disc was purchased

View attachment 101742


P-002: image showing the chest shop where the plaintiff purchased the disc


View attachment 101744


P-003: video link containing the disc not playing the correct music

Click to expand...
This still lacks the case tags required for Complaints.
 
Apologies, Your Honor. I will fix that.
 

​

Case Filing



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MattisSuperstar
Plaintiff

v.

teji2
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On September 27th, 2026, the plaintiff bought a music disc valued at DC$5,000 from a chest shop owned by teji2, under the impression that the disc would play "The Internationale" by Eugène Pottier. When played, the disc instead plays "Cat' by c418. The plaintiff made multiple attempts to contact the defendant, and was unable to initiate contact to either exchange the disc for one with the correct song or provide a refund. The plaintiff is seeking DC$5,000, plus coverage of legal costs.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. MattisSuperstar
2. teji2

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th day of September, 2026, MattisSuperstar purchased a music disc labelled "The Internationale", a song written by Eugène Pottier in June of 1871.
2. The disc was purchased from a chest shop owned by teji2.
3. The disc was purchased for DC$5,000.
4. When played, the disc purchased was found to actually contain "Cat", written by Daniel Rosenfeld (a. k. a. C418.) in March of 2011.
5. Multiple attempts were made to contact the defendant to obtain either a refund or the correct disc, but none were successful.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff refers to the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.
2. This conduct by the defendant clearly violates the subsection in reference to "a: engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3: The plaintiff argues that the position he was placed in created a situation where he was mislead in connection with the supply of a good.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A specific performance order to require the defendant to produce a disc containing the song "The Internationale".
2. DC$5,000 in Compensatory Damages, according to Claim II: Violation in Reference to "Engaging in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3. DC$3,000 in Legal Fees, the minimum required by the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part III Subsection 7 (d.).

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of October 2026.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: shows the transaction logs after the disc was purchased

1791738718843.png


P-002: image showing the chest shop where the plaintiff purchased the disc


1791738791361.png
P-003: video link containing the disc not playing the correct music


YouTube Link




 
Last edited:
Mimtembo said:

​

Case Filing



IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
MattisSuperstar
Plaintiff

v.

teji2
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES
1. MattisSuperstar
2. teji2

II. FACTS
1. On the 27th day of September, 2026, MattisSuperstar purchased a music disc labelled "The Internationale", a song written by Eugène Pottier in June of 1871.
2. The disc was purchased from a chest shop owned by teji2.
3. The disc was purchased for DC$5,000.
4. When played, the disc purchased was found to actually contain "Cat", written by Daniel Rosenfeld (a. k. a. C418.) in March of 2011.
5. Multiple attempts were made to contact the defendant to obtain either a refund or the correct disc, but none were successful.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The plaintiff refers to the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.
2. This conduct by the defendant clearly violates the subsection in reference to "a: engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3: The plaintiff argues that the position he was placed in created a situation where he was mislead in connection with the supply of a good.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A specific performance order to require the defendant to produce a disc containing the song "The Internationale".
2. DC$5,000 in Compensatory Damages, according to Claim II: Violation in Reference to "Engaging in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services."
3. DC$3,000 in Legal Fees, the minimum required by the Redmont Civil Code Act (1st January, 2026) Part III Subsection 7 (d.).

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of October 2026.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001: shows the transaction logs after the disc was purchased

View attachment 101814


P-002: image showing the chest shop where the plaintiff purchased the disc


View attachment 101815
P-003: video link containing the disc not playing the correct music






Click to expand...
This YouTube link doesn’t work. Fix this issue and, preferably, embed the video within this case filing. The court permits Plaintiff to edit this post, given that the Court is informed when the edit is made.
 
Of course, Your Honor, give me five minutes and it will be fixed.
 
Would you like me to include that in the edit, or post it separately?
 
Your Honor, I have completed the YouTube link edit, and it should be functional now.
 
Consent to be represented.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9913.jpeg
    IMG_9913.jpeg
    98.1 KB · Views: 32

Writ of Summons


teji2 is hereby summoned to appear before the District Court in the case of MatthisSuperstar v. teji2 [2026] DCR 189.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Your Honor, may I add my Supervisor as co-counsel in order to ensure that my client receives their fair trial?
 
Yes, Your Honor. I would like to add @SplashyAlpaca77 as Lead Counsel and I will fulfil the role of co-counsel. Thank you for your time.
 
Defendant teji2 is hereby held in Contempt of Court for failing to appear, and shall be fined 5 Penalty Units.

The Defendant shall not receive a Public Defender, and this case shall proceed into inquest in line with Rule 3.6.1 (Default Judgment on Failure to Respond). Inquest Proceedings shall occur in the following manner, taken from Rule 3.6.2:
(a) Inquest Discovery. Rule 4 shall apply in full where appropriate.
(b) Witness Testimony, Subpoenas, and Writs. The Plaintiff may apply by motion for the issuance of subpoenas, writs, or summonses as the Court deems judicially prudent.
(c) Legal Brief. The Plaintiff shall submit a written brief containing a factual narrative of the controversy and all relevant legal arguments.
 
Your Honor,

That has been a misunderstanding during this case. I'm mananging partner at the firm that Mimtembo works for. I ask for you to remove @SplashyAlpaca77 as lead counsel and for me to be lead counsel. The plaintiff has a agreed for me and the firm to represent him during this case and at no point Splashy and his diffrent firm.

Thank you for your time.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-10-16 225620.png
    Screenshot 2026-10-16 225620.png
    19.8 KB · Views: 19
Your honor is this legal?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-10-16 163606.png
    Screenshot 2026-10-16 163606.png
    384.9 KB · Views: 28
Your Honor,
Too summarize: I messed up. I am no longer counsel for this.
 
Your Honor, I apologize for the confusion. I have switched law firms, and will no longer be counsel on this case.
 
Your Honor,

The plaintiff would like to end the discovery early. Thank you for your time.
 
Your Honor,

May I additional evince about the music disc and "The Internationale", as you mentioned you could not access the previously submitted Youtube Link?
 

Brief



IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

MattisSuperstar v. teji2 [2026] DCR 189 - legal Brief

1. Facts of the Case

The plaintiff bought the music disc from the defendant, as shown in evidence. The music disc chestshop was clearly labeled with "Internationale" a well-known song you can listen to on Youtube for example. As you can hear and see in the tooltip the music disc is "Cat" the vanilla music disc. The disc costed 5000$ and the plaintiff has not gotten back his money. You can view the actual song "The Internationale" in P-003.

2. Legal Arguments

2.1 Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce
Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VI Subsection 3: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce.

According to the Civil Code Act: Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce (A): "engages in conduct that is misleading, deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive another person in connection with the promotion, sale, or supply of goods or services.". In this example the defendant created a chestshop and put a sign right over it with the song "The Internationale". Any reasonable person could easily believe that the chestshop sold the song "The Internationale" but so was not the case, the wrong music was sold in the chestshop. The plaintiff was sold a completely different song, "Cat".

2.2 Damages
As a result of this the plaintiff directly lost 5000$ paid to the Defendant for a music disc that wasn't the correct my client was promised from the sign above the chestshop. The plaintiff has not received any kind of refund from the client, leaving my client without his 5000$. Therefore, the plaintiff asks the Court to award the Plaintiff compensatory damages.

 

Court Order


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER

Upon review of the evidence presented, the Court has found a deficiency: no evidence has been presented linking the Corporate account "Rare" to the Defendant, where the firm "Rare" was the owner of the chestshop at the time of the purchase, as seen in P-001. In order to find in favor of the Plaintiff, the Court requires evidence showing this connection. Since it was partially an oversight of the Court to have not noticed this deficiency before this point, the Court gives Plaintiff 48 hours to present to the Court evidence of a link between the firm "Rare" and the Defendant.

So Ordered.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top