IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Mask3D_WOLF (Lovely Law Firm Representing)
Plaintiff
v.
Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On the 22nd of July , the Joint Legal Reform Committee (JLRC) summoned Mask3D_WOLF to a hearing (Evidence H). Mask3D_WOLF was punctual with responding to questions during the hearing, before it was put on hold due to the debate between Nacholebraa and xEndeavour (Evidence E). Once the hearing was resumed, Mask3D_WOLF was asked a question by the committee, which she did not respond to, and she was charged with Contempt of Congress . However, Mask3D_WOLF was not pinged again by the JRLC to respond to the question, and was not pinged again until the Contempt of Congress charge was filed (Evidence G). Mask3D_WOLF was dealing with an IRL matter, and did not receive proper notification. Therefore, Mask3D_WOLF was unable to respond.
I. PARTIES
1. Mask3D_WOLF (Prosecution)
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defense)
II. FACTS
1. On July 22nd, Mask3D_WOLF was summoned to a Hearing by the Joint Legal Reform Committee (JLRC) (Evidence H).
2. Mask3D_WOLF has been answering questions as quickly as she could.
3. Senator xEndeavour started asking questions after their turn had ended (Evidence E).
4. Nacholebraa and xEndeavour started debating in the Hearing channel.
5. Nacholebraa put the Hearing into recess (Evidence E).
6. Motion was put up to remove the committee from recess and passed (Evidence F).
7. xEndeavour asks the same questions without pinging Mask3d_Wolf which prompted AlexanderLove to ping her instead (Evidence G).
8. Mask3D_WOLF stated she would get to it that night.
9. The question then slipped Mask3D_WOLF’s mind due to being very busy which prompted no answer.
10. 48 hours later xLayzur files a motion for a Contempt of Congress charge against Mask3D_WOLF (Evidence G).
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. From the Constitution, Evidence A, “The Senate can only issue punishments to a verdict as specified within this constitution”. The Senate has no right to motion for Contempt of Congress as the punishment Contempt of Congress is listed in the Legislative Standards Act (LSA) and not the Constitution.
2. Right 9, Evidence B, “ fair trial presided over by an impartial Judge, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and to be confronted with the evidence against them, and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense.”
Mask3D_WOLF does not have a fair trial given that for a fair trial you must have an Impartial Judge presiding over the case. Given the people voting on the motion are the people overseeing and running the Hearing she is not given an impartial Judge. Mask3D_WOLF has also not been able to explain and have the assistance of counsel for their defense before the voting commenced.
3. Right 13, Evidence C, ”equal protection and equal benefit of the law without unfair discrimination and, in particular, without unfair discrimination based on political belief or social status.”Mask3D_WOLF was not given equal protection or benefit of the law, as the charge of Contempt of Congress was filed with prejudice. The charge was not voted on by an unbiased panel.
4. Right 14, Evidence D, “the right to life, liberty, and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.” Due to every citizen having the same right to not be deprived of life, liberty, and justice, Mask3D_WOLF’s rights were violated as they were not given the right to a fair trial. This violates both Rights 9 and 14 as they do not have justice.
5. The Constitution is a contract. How is the Constitution a contract you may ask? Well if we look at the Foundation of Contract Law Act (CLF), some criteria include, Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Capacity, Legality, Legal Intent, and Format. The Constitution has the offer which is done when you are offered the option to run for Office or are offered the position to hold a public office, Consideration is done when you consider whether to run or take the office, Capacity is achieved through in what capacity will you work in that position, Legality is achieved through whether it legally binding, Legal Intent is achieved as it is meant to form the Government and it's positions, Format is achieved through the way the Constitution is written, and finally acceptance is written through the oath.
There is also a theory for this exact thing, “Social contract theory says that people live together in society in accordance with an agreement that establishes moral and political rules of behavior.” The Constitution is an agreement signed by all which provides rights, punishments, jobs, and more which an agreement is a contract (Non-Disclosure Agreement for example). Thus the Committee has violated this Contract and the rest of the Senate aided in violating the Constitution.
Given that Congress can only do punishments outlined within the Constitution and Contempt of Congress not being one of them, this means that the Senate violated the Constitution which is a document they are meant to uphold and thus violated it’s contract and is subject to the punishments.
6. The Committee did not at all ping or attempt to contact Mask3D_WOLF regarding the question again during those 48 hours. Everyone can get busy between those times and although yes, xLayzur shows Mask3D_WOLF getting on, is it too far-fetched to believe someone can get on while being very busy? Whether it be late night, lunch, or just a short break between everything. We all have time for games even when lives are heavily busy. This makes it easy for things to slip your mind due to focusing on other things and not being reminded about a question.
Given this the Committee did not make an attempt to notify Mask3D_WOLF before motioning and approving the charge. Mask3D_WOLF’s attorney even had to ping regarding the question with no help from the Committee before the 48 hours began. Showing that the committee was making no effort to attempt to make the questions answered quickly.
7. The Legislative Standards Act did not have a Referendum. Due to the Act changing the Constitution and adding itself in with no Referendum seen (see Evidence K). You may be asking if this didn’t have a referendum then Referendums must not have been around at the time.The Legislative Standards Act was posted on April 23, 2021, if we look at the Pardon Powers Amendment we can see it got a referendum (Evidence L) and it was posted on April 4, 2021.
Thus showing that the Legislative Standards Act is an illegal change to the Constitution and did not follow due process for complex changes and should also be unable to be used by Congress as it was not put through a Referendum.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Removal of Charge.
2. $15k in compensation for not making reasonable efforts before filing the Charge and breaching of a contract (the Constitution).
3. $10k in Legal Fees.
V. EVIDENCE
Evidence A
Evidence B
Evidence C
Evidence D
Evidence E
Evidence F
Evidence G
Evidence H
Evidence I
Evidence J
Evidence K
www.democracycraft.net
Evidence L
Evidence M
Discord is the easiest way to communicate over voice, video, and text. Chat, hang out, and stay close with your friends and communities.
discord.com
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of August, 2023.