- Joined
- Jan 7, 2025
- Messages
- 72
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2.Motion
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL [FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF]
Noting the Co-Defendant's Head of Legal Department in the ticket (P-005) with TheSnowGuardian said "that is something from the bot not dependent on us now we have a policy not to share those with anyone. if these have been violated you are welcome to leave a report and that will be taken seriously".
Your Honour, the Plaintiff motions that the Court compel the Co-Defendant to produce the following:
1. Any and all documents that are or were in effect, acting as policies, that may be guiding or binding regarding the process, disclosure, and/or storing of applications received by the SDP.
2. Disciplinary actions taken against Plura72 by the Executive Committee of the Co-Defendant, if any, after the controversial message which contained the Plaintiff's application. (See P-005, Dearev said "fowarded to EC" after TheSnowGuardian sent him a message link pointing towards said message link)