Lawsuit: Dismissed malka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 87

[Franciscus]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

Your Honor,

I had missed OmegaBiebel's message upon re-read. Therefore, I seek to strike his name from the below quoted motion.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Your Honor,

To the best of my knowledge, despite the subpoenas you issued, the following individuals have not complied nor notified the court whatsoever of the materials demanded by the subpoenas:

1. Milkcrack
2. Gwiis
3. Omegabiebel
4. xEndeavour

As the individuals have failed to respond to the subpoena, the Commonwealth asks that they be held in Contempt of Court for failure to provide discovery.

 

[ameslap]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Your Honor,

To the best of my knowledge, despite the subpoenas you issued, the following individuals have not complied nor notified the court whatsoever of the materials demanded by the subpoenas:

1. Milkcrack
2. Gwiis
3. Omegabiebel
4. xEndeavour

As the individuals have failed to respond to the subpoena, the Commonwealth asks that they be held in Contempt of Court for failure to provide discovery.

@Milkcrack , @gwiis, and @End shall be held in Contempt of Court. They shall each be fined $5,000. They are still ordered to comply with the Court ordered subpoena within 72 hours or face additional sanctions.

Omegabiebel made themselves known to the court and the court missed it. I will not charge them for my mistake.

Also, I see your motion to strike. Go ahead.

 

[aubunny]

Response

Your Honor,

There is no rational basis that the Plaintiff should be able to call a witness of their choosing from the Supreme Court and that the Defense should not be able to call a different one. That the Commonwealth chooses to pursue a vigorous defense against the allegations made against it does not make its own chosen witness irrelevant - this Court cannot endorse a game of "first one to call dibs" when it comes to picking a witness.

Your honor, may you give input on this objection before the timer for opening statements has started? I wish to make sure both parties have a complete picture of the case before it is properly in session, the same would go for the subpoena from omega.

 

[ameslap]

Your honor, may you give input on this objection before the timer for opening statements has started? I wish to make sure both parties have a complete picture of the case before it is properly in session, the same would go for the subpoena from omega.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Relevance

We already have multiple expertise based witnesses, including Smallfries, who is another sitting justice. The plaintiff worries that by introducing another member of the supreme court as an expert witness, something we already have plenty of- It would risk preventing this case from being appealed in the future by either party under the sitting SCR.

I do not believe it was the commonwealths intent to try and deny this portion of the courts due process, but in the interest of protecting it, we request this witness be struck on the grounds of not biasing a majority of the scr against this case, especially when it is done needlessly as we have an abundance of expertise witnesses already.

Objection Sustained. It is this court's belief that to call a sitting justice, judge, or magistrate to testify in a trial is improper.

I allowed the communication from Smallfries because it was from their time prior to sitting on the bench. To ask a sitting judicial officer to testify and make comments about a case that is not before them is not something I will set a precedent on. My main concern is that comments made during testimony will be used by future courts and lawyers as precedent or interpretation.

So I shall be removing all sitting justices, judges, and magistrates from the witness pool.

To update the timeline, the Plaintiff shall have 72 hours starting now on their Opening Statement.

 

[End]

Present

 

[aubunny]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NOLLE PROSEQUI

It is with heavy heart that I admit the following; I don't have the time for this case.
As a solo practitioner, I cannot easily pawn off my cases to other parties without incurring potential fee or debt.
While I attempted to do so to some lawyers that i trust, they ultimately did not have the time to handle the caseload either.


I wish to send an open request to all lawyers out there: when this case gets dismissed, please look into taking my mantle. While I am no longer pursuing this case, I believe that the facts herewithin still show a pressing tale of abuse of congressional powers in the guise of "checks and balances."

Thank you all for your time. I apologize especially to those who were subpoenaed by the opposing counsel and, as a result, ended up with a contempt fine.

I hope to see this issue in front of the courts again soon, but with a more competent and free lawyer.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

@Milkcrack , @gwiis, and @End shall be held in Contempt of Court. They shall each be fined $5,000. They are still ordered to comply with the Court ordered subpoena within 72 hours or face additional sanctions.

Omegabiebel made themselves known to the court and the court missed it. I will not charge them for my mistake.

Also, I see your motion to strike. Go ahead.

I send a formal request to the courts to reconsider this ruling. I do not believe that these, now inactive users [save for the end], should be punished for missing a deadline for a court case that is no longer in session [pending the judge responding to my nolle prosequi]

 

[ameslap]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
NOLLE PROSEQUI

It is with heavy heart that I admit the following; I don't have the time for this case.
As a solo practitioner, I cannot easily pawn off my cases to other parties without incurring potential fee or debt.
While I attempted to do so to some lawyers that i trust, they ultimately did not have the time to handle the caseload either.


I wish to send an open request to all lawyers out there: when this case gets dismissed, please look into taking my mantle. While I am no longer pursuing this case, I believe that the facts herewithin still show a pressing tale of abuse of congressional powers in the guise of "checks and balances."

Thank you all for your time. I apologize especially to those who were subpoenaed by the opposing counsel and, as a result, ended up with a contempt fine.

I hope to see this issue in front of the courts again soon, but with a more competent and free lawyer.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER

I send a formal request to the courts to reconsider this ruling. I do not believe that these, now inactive users [save for the end], should be punished for missing a deadline for a court case that is no longer in session [pending the judge responding to my nolle prosequi]

Both motions are granted. This case is dismissed.

No body shall be led in any contempt.

Court is now adjourned. Thank you.