Lawsuit: Pending lucaaasserole v Naezaratheus et al. [2025] FCR 50

F

Franciscus

Citizen
Supporter
Aventura Resident
5th Anniversary
Multiman155
Multiman155
Attorney
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Messages
76

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

lucaaasserole (Mezimoří Legal Department - MZLD representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Naezaratheus and DangerNoodle2570
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Plaintiff, lucaaasserole, brings this action against Defendants Naezaratheus and his alternative account, DangerNoodle2570, arising from a fraudulent transaction that caused the Plaintiff to suffer a quantifiable financial injury of $100,000. On May 22, 2025, Defendant 2 (DangerNoodle2570) contacted the Plaintiff offering to sell 578 shares of BB.A, a publicly traded class A share of Brick and Browse, for $100,000. The parties agreed to complete the transaction via a Voyager account instead of through The Exchange. However, the shares were never delivered, despite Defendant 2’s contractual promise to do so within 24 hours. Repeated attempts by the Plaintiff to follow up were met with silence until Defendant 1, Naezaratheus, publicly admitted that he operated Defendant 2 as an alternative account used to facilitate the transaction, thereby confirming that he was the true party behind the scheme.

The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants’ conduct constitutes breach of contract, violation of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and fraud under the relevant statutory provisions. Defendant 2, acting as an extension of Defendant 1, not only failed to deliver the shares but also intentionally misrepresented their identity and intentions, with the aim of deceiving the Plaintiff. These misrepresentations were material and induced the Plaintiff to transfer the funds under false pretenses. As a result, the Plaintiff seeks $100,000 in compensatory damages and $200,000 in punitive damages due to the egregious and willful nature of the fraud. Additionally, the Plaintiff requests that the Court authorize warrants to obtain detailed account, transaction, and communication records to facilitate the recovery of assets and ensure full accountability for the Defendants' actions.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
  1. lucaaasserole
  2. Naezaratheus
  3. DangerNoodle2570

II. FACTS
  1. lucaaasserole ("Plaintiff") is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
  2. Naezaratheus ("Defendant 1") is a deported person who formerly resided in the Commonwealth of Redmont (see: Evidence P-001).
  3. DangerNoodle2570 Discord Account vylu0325 (also known as "Noodle"; "Defendant 2") is an alternative account of Naezaratheus (see: Evidence P-002, P-003, P-004, P-007).
  4. Defendant 2 created a Discord account in February 2025, joined the DemocracyCraft Server on 18 March 2025, and joined the DemocracyCraft Discord on 20 March 2025 (see: Evidence P-006).
  5. Defendant 2 reached out to Plaintiff on 22 May 2025 in a purported offer to sell shares to Plaintiff at a favorable price (see: Evidence P-005).
  6. BB.A shares are class A shares of Brick and Browse, a company whose shares are on The Exchange (see: Evidence P-008).
  7. During a conversation with Plaintiff, Defendant 2 offered Plaintiff 578 BB.A shares in exchange for $100,000 (see: Evidence P-005).
  8. To purportedly facilitate this transaction, Defendant 2 instructied Plaintiff to transfer Defendant 2 $100,000 via The Exchange, but Plaintiff did not do so, saying that Plaintiff did not have enough Money in The Exchange to facilitate the transaction (see: Evidence P-005).
  9. Instead of transferring money via The Exchange, the Plaintiff and Defendant 2 agreed to transfer money into Voyager Account No. 0665-3053, with a promise that the BB.A shares would arrive in the Plaintiff's account within 24 hours (see: Evidence P-005).
  10. Defendant 2, thus, entered into a legally binding contract with Plaintiff for the exchange of these shares.
  11. Plaintiff did transfer money to Defendant 2, satisfying Plaintiff's obligations under the contract (see: Evidence: P-005a).
  12. The promised BB.A shares, however, did not arrive in the Plaintiff's account within 24 hours. The Plaintiff reached out to Defendant 2 repeatedly to inquire about these shares (see: Evidence P-005).
  13. On 23 May 2025, Defendant 1 declared publicly that "noodle is my alt" and that "noodle was me" (see: Evidence P-002 and P-003).
  14. This "noodle" referred to the same entity as DangerNoodle2570 (see: Evidence P-005, P-009).
  15. This "noodle" holds an account with The Exchange (see: Evidence P-009).
  16. Defendant 1 did not only use this single alternative account on discord (see: Evidence P-004, P-010, P-011).
  17. Defendant 1 said that "I used two alt accounts noodle and og" (see: Evidence P-004).
  18. This "og" was actually "oog", a discord-only alt account who had attempted a similar sales pitch to other members of the public (see: Evidence P-004, P-010, P-011).
  19. Defendant 1 repeatedly confessed in multiple fora that Defendant 2 was Defendant 1's alternative account.
  20. Defendant 1 told Plaintiff that Plaintiff would not receive the shares promised by Defendant 2, his alternative account (see: Evidence P-007).
  21. Defendant 2 violated their duty to engage in good faith and fair dealing with Plaintiff.
  22. Defendant 2 had breached their contract with Plaintiff.
  23. Because Defendant 2 is an alternative account of Defendant 1, the two are the same person.
  24. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Defendant 1 also violated their duty to engage in good faith and fair dealing with Plaintiff.
  25. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Defendant 1 also breached their contract with Plaintiff.
  26. Defendant 2 being an alternative account of Defendant 1, and thus the same person, was an intentional ommission of an important material fact.
  27. Defendant 2 not having intended to follow through on transferring shares to Plaintiff was an intentional ommission of an important material fact.
  28. Plaintiff relied on the misrepresentation that Defendant 2 would transfer shares to Plaintiff when agreeing to send Defendant 2 a Vanguard transfer in the amount of $100,000.
  29. Plaintiff relied on Defendant 2 not being Defendant 1 when agreeing to transfer money to Defendant 2.
  30. As a result of Defendant 2's misrepresentations, Plaintiff suffered an actual, quantifiable injury in the form of the loss of $100,000.
  31. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Plaintiff equally suffered an actual, quantifiable injury in the form of the loss of $100,000 because of Defendant 1's fraudulent misrepresentations.
  32. Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 defrauded Plaintiff, causing the Plaintiff acute financial harm.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. Breach of Contract.
    • Clause 7(1) of the Contracts Act states that "[a] breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations." Subclause (a) of the same notes that "Remedies for breach may include damages, specific performance, or other equitable relief."
    • Because Defendant 2 (and, as they are the same person, Defendant 1) breached their contract with the Plaintiff, causing acute financial injury to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff seeks equitable relief from damages per the above.
  2. Violation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.
    • Section 14(1) of the Contracts Act requires that "[p]arties to a contract shall perform their respective duties and exercise their rights under the contract in good faith and in a manner that is fair and just."
    • By failing to perform their duties under the contract in good faith, and failing to deliver stock in exchange for the $100,000, Defendants caused acute financial injury to the Plaintiff, upon which equitable relief is sought.
  3. Fraud.
    • The Commercial Standards Act defines fraud as "An intentional or reckless misrepresentation or omission of an important fact, especially a material one, to a victim who justifiably relies on that misrepresentation; and the victim party or entity suffered actual, quantifiable injury or damages as a result of the misrepresentation or omission". Fraud, under this act, is a criminal offense.
    • As stated in Section 4, Clause 1(a) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act, “in civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed.” Unquestionably here, Plaintiff was defrauded by Defendants, leading to concrete and calculable damages arising of the loss of $100,000.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
  1. Compensatory Damages:
    1. The actions of the defendants have caused the Plaintiff the direct pecuniary loss of $100,000 by taking $100,000 from the Plaintiff and failing to deliver the promised stock. For this reason, the Plaintiff seeks $100,000 in direct compensatory damages arising from the breach of contract, violations of duty to good faith and fair dealing, and fraud committed by the Defendants.

      In the event that it is impossible to recover the amount in cash, the Plaintiff asks the court to seize real assets (such as plots) from Defendants up to the equivalent of in-game value in order to justly compensate Plaintiff for injuries incurred.
  2. Punitive damages:
    1. This was an outrageous and outright fraud; from start to end, the Defendant acted with bad faith, and sought to take advantage of the Plaintiff in order to facilitate illicit gains. Treble damages serve as a strong deterrent to future wrongful conduct and are called for in these heinous and outrageous actions by the Defendants. As such, the Plaintiff seeks $200,000 in punitive damages arising from the breach of contract, violations of duty to good faith and fair dealing, and fraud committed by the Defendants.
    2. Moreover, in order to assist in the recovery of assets from this outrageous conduct, the Plaintiff asks that the Court authorize a warrant for the production to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel of:
      1. A full list of all accounts deported for being alternative accounts of Naezaratheus;
      2. A full list of all in-game balance transfers from or to Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
      3. A full list of all real property ("plot") transfers from or to Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
      4. A full list of all messages sent or received in-game by or from Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
  3. Legal fees
    1. In line with the Legal Damages Act, the Plaintiff seeks 30% of damages awarded, and no less than $6,000, to be paid to Mezimoří Law.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26 day of May 2025

Evidence:

1748240830051.png
1748241040030.png
1748244467592.png
1748241095231.png
1748242042563.png
1748241687854.png

1748241701202.png

1748241711256.png

1748241720064.png

1748241727335.png

1748241734827.png

1748241743637.png

1748241755386.png

1748241763533.png

1748241773547.png
1748246901521.png
1748242569479.png

1748242469177.png

1748247395135.png
1748242762610.png
1748242948015.png

1748243026383.png
1748243573655.png
1748243885164.png
1748244467649.png

1748244180732.png


Witness list:

  1. lucaaasserole
  2. lukeyyyMC
  3. Just_Jada
  4. Naezaratheus
  5. DangerNoodle2570 Discord Account vylu0325 (also known as "Noodle")



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your honor,

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if assets illicitly gained by DangerNoodle2570 (and, by extension, Naezaratheus) are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. Therefore, in order to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

  1. Any funds present within the in-game balances of Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof;
  2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof (c.f. Evidence P-IN1);
  3. Any other assets of Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:
    1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
    2. Bank accounts at Voyager, Vanguard, Ryze, Cobblestone Bank, or any other bank;
    3. Financial accounts at The Exchange, Vanguard Market Access (or successor), or any other non-bank financial institution;
    4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
    5. Accounts receivable;
    6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
    7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
    8. Property held in any Vault;
    9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
    10. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
    11. Beneficial ownership in any trust.
Because Defendant Naezaratheus is deported, Dangernoodle2570 appears to be an alternative account of a deported player, and unnamed alternative accounts would be covered under the deportation of Naezaratheus, the Plaintiff believe that the risk of harm to the defendants from this emergency injunction is low relative to the risk that assets are further laundered and/or distributed, preventing recovery of assets in this case.

1748248035380.png



1748248261155.png
 

Attachments

  • 1748244449942.png
    1748244449942.png
    23.3 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:
Your honor,

Following a clarification from senior staff during the filing of this case and not noticed until after the filing of this case, the Plaintiff moves as follows:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND

The Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint and motion for injunction as follows:

  1. Fact 14 of the Complaint is hereby stricken in its entirety.
  2. Within fact 4 of the Complaint, the text ", joined the DemocracyCraft Server on 18 March 2025," is hereby stricken.
  3. All other references to "DangerNoodle2570" made in the Complaint or Motion for Emergency Injunction are hereby replaced with
    Discord Account vylu0325 (also known as "Noodle")
    Click to expand...

 
Your honor,

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Defendant Naezaratheus is permanently deported (see: Evidence P-001). As the Supreme Court noted in UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2, "Deported players have no rights in our nation and have no rights to dispute this in court."

Under Rule 3.6 (Default Judgment, Failure to Submit Defense), defendants are required to provide "affirmations or denials on all facts in addition to having defenses under the law or fact prior to the end of discovery". Because Naezaratheus has no rights in our nation and no rights to dispute this claim, Naezaratheus is legally unable to provide an Answer to Complaint, and will inevitable fail to submit a defense.

In the interests of speedy justice for the Plaintiff, and for the reasons laid out above, the Plaintiff seeks default judgement against Naezaratheus.

 
Franciscus said:

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

lucaaasserole (Mezimoří Legal Department - MZLD representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Naezaratheus and DangerNoodle2570
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES

  1. lucaaasserole
  2. Naezaratheus
  3. DangerNoodle2570

II. FACTS
  1. lucaaasserole ("Plaintiff") is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont.
  2. Naezaratheus ("Defendant 1") is a deported person who formerly resided in the Commonwealth of Redmont (see: Evidence P-001).
  3. DangerNoodle2570 ("Defendant 2") is an alternative account of Naezaratheus (see: Evidence P-002, P-003, P-004, P-007).
  4. Defendant 2 created a Discord account in February 2025, joined the DemocracyCraft Server on 18 March 2025, and joined the DemocracyCraft Discord on 20 March 2025 (see: Evidence P-006).
  5. Defendant 2 reached out to Plaintiff on 22 May 2025 in a purported offer to sell shares to Plaintiff at a favorable price (see: Evidence P-005).
  6. BB.A shares are class A shares of Brick and Browse, a company whose shares are on The Exchange (see: Evidence P-008).
  7. During a conversation with Plaintiff, Defendant 2 offered Plaintiff 578 BB.A shares in exchange for $100,000 (see: Evidence P-005).
  8. To purportedly facilitate this transaction, Defendant 2 instructied Plaintiff to transfer Defendant 2 $100,000 via The Exchange, but Plaintiff did not do so, saying that Plaintiff did not have enough Money in The Exchange to facilitate the transaction (see: Evidence P-005).
  9. Instead of transferring money via The Exchange, the Plaintiff and Defendant 2 agreed to transfer money into Voyager Account No. 0665-3053, with a promise that the BB.A shares would arrive in the Plaintiff's account within 24 hours (see: Evidence P-005).
  10. Defendant 2, thus, entered into a legally binding contract with Plaintiff for the exchange of these shares.
  11. Plaintiff did transfer money to Defendant 2, satisfying Plaintiff's obligations under the contract (see: Evidence: P-005a).
  12. The promised BB.A shares, however, did not arrive in the Plaintiff's account within 24 hours. The Plaintiff reached out to Defendant 2 repeatedly to inquire about these shares (see: Evidence P-005).
  13. On 23 May 2025, Defendant 1 declared publicly that "noodle is my alt" and that "noodle was me" (see: Evidence P-002 and P-003).
  14. This "noodle" referred to the same entity as DangerNoodle2570 (see: Evidence P-005, P-009).
  15. This "noodle" holds an account with The Exchange (see: Evidence P-009).
  16. Defendant 1 did not only use this single alternative account on discord (see: Evidence P-004, P-010, P-011).
  17. Defendant 1 said that "I used two alt accounts noodle and og" (see: Evidence P-004).
  18. This "og" was actually "oog", a discord-only alt account who had attempted a similar sales pitch to other members of the public (see: Evidence P-004, P-010, P-011).
  19. Defendant 1 repeatedly confessed in multiple fora that Defendant 2 was Defendant 1's alternative account.
  20. Defendant 1 told Plaintiff that Plaintiff would not receive the shares promised by Defendant 2, his alternative account (see: Evidence P-007).
  21. Defendant 2 violated their duty to engage in good faith and fair dealing with Plaintiff.
  22. Defendant 2 had breached their contract with Plaintiff.
  23. Because Defendant 2 is an alternative account of Defendant 1, the two are the same person.
  24. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Defendant 1 also violated their duty to engage in good faith and fair dealing with Plaintiff.
  25. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Defendant 1 also breached their contract with Plaintiff.
  26. Defendant 2 being an alternative account of Defendant 1, and thus the same person, was an intentional ommission of an important material fact.
  27. Defendant 2 not having intended to follow through on transferring shares to Plaintiff was an intentional ommission of an important material fact.
  28. Plaintiff relied on the misrepresentation that Defendant 2 would transfer shares to Plaintiff when agreeing to send Defendant 2 a Vanguard transfer in the amount of $100,000.
  29. Plaintiff relied on Defendant 2 not being Defendant 1 when agreeing to transfer money to Defendant 2.
  30. As a result of Defendant 2's misrepresentations, Plaintiff suffered an actual, quantifiable injury in the form of the loss of $100,000.
  31. Because Defendant 2 and Defendant 1 are the same person, Plaintiff equally suffered an actual, quantifiable injury in the form of the loss of $100,000 because of Defendant 1's fraudulent misrepresentations.
  32. Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 defrauded Plaintiff, causing the Plaintiff acute financial harm.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. Breach of Contract.
    • Clause 7(1) of the Contracts Act states that "[a] breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations." Subclause (a) of the same notes that "Remedies for breach may include damages, specific performance, or other equitable relief."
    • Because Defendant 2 (and, as they are the same person, Defendant 1) breached their contract with the Plaintiff, causing acute financial injury to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff seeks equitable relief from damages per the above.
  2. Violation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.
    • Section 14(1) of the Contracts Act requires that "[p]arties to a contract shall perform their respective duties and exercise their rights under the contract in good faith and in a manner that is fair and just."
    • By failing to perform their duties under the contract in good faith, and failing to deliver stock in exchange for the $100,000, Defendants caused acute financial injury to the Plaintiff, upon which equitable relief is sought.
  3. Fraud.
    • The Commercial Standards Act defines fraud as "An intentional or reckless misrepresentation or omission of an important fact, especially a material one, to a victim who justifiably relies on that misrepresentation; and the victim party or entity suffered actual, quantifiable injury or damages as a result of the misrepresentation or omission". Fraud, under this act, is a criminal offense.
    • As stated in Section 4, Clause 1(a) of the Standardized Criminal Code Act, “in civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed.” Unquestionably here, Plaintiff was defrauded by Defendants, leading to concrete and calculable damages arising of the loss of $100,000.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
  1. Compensatory Damages:
    1. The actions of the defendants have caused the Plaintiff the direct pecuniary loss of $100,000 by taking $100,000 from the Plaintiff and failing to deliver the promised stock. For this reason, the Plaintiff seeks $100,000 in direct compensatory damages arising from the breach of contract, violations of duty to good faith and fair dealing, and fraud committed by the Defendants.

      In the event that it is impossible to recover the amount in cash, the Plaintiff asks the court to seize real assets (such as plots) from Defendants up to the equivalent of in-game value in order to justly compensate Plaintiff for injuries incurred.
  2. Punitive damages:
    1. This was an outrageous and outright fraud; from start to end, the Defendant acted with bad faith, and sought to take advantage of the Plaintiff in order to facilitate illicit gains. Treble damages serve as a strong deterrent to future wrongful conduct and are called for in these heinous and outrageous actions by the Defendants. As such, the Plaintiff seeks $200,000 in punitive damages arising from the breach of contract, violations of duty to good faith and fair dealing, and fraud committed by the Defendants.
    2. Moreover, in order to assist in the recovery of assets from this outrageous conduct, the Plaintiff asks that the Court authorize a warrant for the production to the Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel of:
      1. A full list of all accounts deported for being alternative accounts of Naezaratheus;
      2. A full list of all in-game balance transfers from or to Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
      3. A full list of all real property ("plot") transfers from or to Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
      4. A full list of all messages sent or received in-game by or from Defendants or any alternative accounts thereof within the past 45 days;
  3. Legal fees
    1. In line with the Legal Damages Act, the Plaintiff seeks 30% of damages awarded, and no less than $6,000, to be paid to Mezimoří Law.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26 day of May 2025

Evidence:

View attachment 55379
View attachment 55380View attachment 55402
View attachment 55381
View attachment 55392
View attachment 55382
View attachment 55383
View attachment 55384
View attachment 55385
View attachment 55386
View attachment 55387
View attachment 55388
View attachment 55389
View attachment 55390
View attachment 55391
View attachment 55404
View attachment 55394
View attachment 55393
View attachment 55405
View attachment 55395
View attachment 55396
View attachment 55397
View attachment 55398
View attachment 55399
View attachment 55403
View attachment 55400


Witness list:

  1. lucaaasserole
  2. lukeyyyMC
  3. Just_Jada
  4. Naezaratheus
  5. DangerNoodle2570



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your honor,

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if assets illicitly gained by DangerNoodle2570 (and, by extension, Naezaratheus) are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. Therefore, in order to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

  1. Any funds present within the in-game balances of Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof;
  2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof (c.f. Evidence P-IN1);
  3. Any other assets of Naezaratheus, Dangernoodle2570, or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:
    1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
    2. Bank accounts at Voyager, Vanguard, Ryze, Cobblestone Bank, or any other bank;
    3. Financial accounts at The Exchange, Vanguard Market Access (or successor), or any other non-bank financial institution;
    4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
    5. Accounts receivable;
    6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
    7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
    8. Property held in any Vault;
    9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
    10. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
    11. Beneficial ownership in any trust.
Because Defendant Naezaratheus is deported, Dangernoodle2570 appears to be an alternative account of a deported player, and unnamed alternative accounts would be covered under the deportation of Naezaratheus, the Plaintiff believe that the risk of harm to the defendants from this emergency injunction is low relative to the risk that assets are further laundered and/or distributed, preventing recovery of assets in this case.

View attachment 55406



View attachment 55407
Click to expand...
Your honor,

It has been almost 4 days since the initial filing. I understand that the complaint is a bit lengthy, but, on behalf of my client, I respectfully request a ruling on the motion to amend and the emergency injunction.
 
Franciscus said:
Your honor,

It has been almost 4 days since the initial filing. I understand that the complaint is a bit lengthy, but, on behalf of my client, I respectfully request a ruling on the motion to amend and the emergency injunction.
Click to expand...
Your honor,

I understand that the federal judiciary is very busy, and that there is presently only 1 FCR Judge. I appreciate the time and effort you give, and I understand that this cannot be taken for granted.

When you get the chance, would you please swiftly provide a ruling on the emergency injunction? It is 10 calendar days since the filing, and it is of the utmost importance that the assets not be transferred elsewhere or escheated, lest the funds become irrecoverable to the Plaintiff.
 
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
Granted in full

MOTION TO AMEND
Granted

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
Granted


Court is in Recess pending a verdict.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top