- Thread Author
- #1
Liz37 (Piluskin representing – Apex Law Firm)
Plaintiff
v.
MrDuckyDK
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follow: The plaintiff, Liz37, has an established farming plot in the town of Willow. The plaintiff recently decided to hire a new employee to the farm, that employee being the defendant, MrDuckyDK. Since the employee was new, the plaintiff decided not to allow access to locked chests as the employee has not earned enough trust at that time. The plaintiff recently took a break from the server to deal with personal matters (about 5-6 days), and upon return discovered that some of his chests had been emptied. Since the chests were locked and located in an established town, there simply is no way for someone to obtain items from the chests without some form of chest griefing. Upon creation of a staff ticket, it was confirmed by huney69, a server moderator, that the defendant altered the landscape around the chest by placing rails and subsequently removing them. Considering the missing items form the chest and block alteration by the defendant, it is obvious that the defendant utilized a minecart-hopper exploitation to retrieve items illegally. The evidence below was made possible and provided by Huney69.
I. PARTIES
1. Liz37 (Piluskin representing) – Plaintiff
2. MrDuckyDK – Defendant
3. Huney69 – Moderator / Witness
II. FACTS
The evidence is simply overwhelming; besides the plaintiff, only the defendant had block alteration rights to the plaintiff’s land. Considering that the alterations where only rail related, it is evident that the defendant used Minecraft-hopper exploitation to steal from the chests. Thus, the defendant is guilty of 3 accounts of 4.3 – Stealing and 10.1 -Fraud. The degree of stealing, however, is unknown.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 11th day of July, 2021
Plaintiff
v.
MrDuckyDK
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The plaintiff complains against the defendant as follow: The plaintiff, Liz37, has an established farming plot in the town of Willow. The plaintiff recently decided to hire a new employee to the farm, that employee being the defendant, MrDuckyDK. Since the employee was new, the plaintiff decided not to allow access to locked chests as the employee has not earned enough trust at that time. The plaintiff recently took a break from the server to deal with personal matters (about 5-6 days), and upon return discovered that some of his chests had been emptied. Since the chests were locked and located in an established town, there simply is no way for someone to obtain items from the chests without some form of chest griefing. Upon creation of a staff ticket, it was confirmed by huney69, a server moderator, that the defendant altered the landscape around the chest by placing rails and subsequently removing them. Considering the missing items form the chest and block alteration by the defendant, it is obvious that the defendant utilized a minecart-hopper exploitation to retrieve items illegally. The evidence below was made possible and provided by Huney69.
I. PARTIES
1. Liz37 (Piluskin representing) – Plaintiff
2. MrDuckyDK – Defendant
3. Huney69 – Moderator / Witness
II. FACTS
- The plaintiff hired the defendant to work on their land, given no permissions for chest access.
- The chests on the property were at one point found to be empty after the plaintiff’s return to the server.
- Evidence provided by Huney69 details block alteration and rails being placed around chests (seen below).
The evidence is simply overwhelming; besides the plaintiff, only the defendant had block alteration rights to the plaintiff’s land. Considering that the alterations where only rail related, it is evident that the defendant used Minecraft-hopper exploitation to steal from the chests. Thus, the defendant is guilty of 3 accounts of 4.3 – Stealing and 10.1 -Fraud. The degree of stealing, however, is unknown.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
- As per 4.3 Stealing, the defendant will return all items to the plaintiff, incur a 15 minute jail sentence, and at least 3-day temp ban, with consideration to any past violations
- As per 10.1 Fraud, the defendant will be fined at least $200 with consideration to any past criminal behavior.
- Considering the lack of knowledge of distinct items stolen, and the number of violations, the defendant will pay the plaintiff $1600 and $400 in legal fees.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 11th day of July, 2021
