Lawsuit: Dismissed Lex Titanum (Formerly Titan Law) v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 84

[dodrio3]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION


Lex Titanum (Formerly Titan Law)

Plaintiff


v.


The Commonwealth of Redmont

Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 22nd of November 2024, the Plaintiff filed [2024] DCR 43 - Appeal. The federal court took no action and failed to issue any communication in the matter until July 7th 2025, a gap of 227 days.

It is outrageous that the courts let an appeal last this length of time. This is a contradiction of the duty under Part II Section 21 of the constitution “delivering unbiased verdicts” allowing this appeal to sit unresolved for 7 months is inconsistent with other appeals and creates a prejudice against the plaintiff. No other appeals of a comparable nature have been subject to the same wait as the plaintiff in [2024] DCR 43.

I. PARTIES

1. Lex Titanum (Previously Titan Law) - Plaintiff
2. The Commonwealth Of Redmont - Defendant


II. FACTS

1. On November 22nd, 2024, Dodrio3 filed [2024] DCR 43 – Appeal.

2. There was no response or indication of the status of the case from the Federal Court until July 7th, 2025.

3. There was a gap of 227 days from when the case was filed until any response was given to the case by the Federal Court.

4. The Plaintiff has a right to an “unbiased verdict”

5. The Plaintiff could have received a 2.5% interest rate on £2000 through a Volt Savings Account. (P-001)

6. The Plaintiff had a direct financial stake in the appeal, as it concerned legal fees owed to the firm as stated in Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72.

7. The delay far exceeded any reasonable timeframe for initial judicial action, causing the Plaintiff financial harm.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The Federal Court Failed to provide an “unbiased verdict”, by taking an excessive amount of time to respond to the appeal.

2. The delay directly caused financial harm, depriving the Plaintiff of the ability to earn interest.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $42,600 in punitive damages for the excess time (213 days) it took for the Federal Court to issue a judgment ($200/day)

2. $380 in lost interest (3.5% monthly) that the Plaintiff would have received if the judgment was made in a timely manner

3. Legal fees equal to 30% of the total monetary relief awarded in this case, regardless of the final amount granted


(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This (day) day of (month) (year)

P-001

 

[ameslap]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION


Lex Titanum (Formerly Titan Law)

Plaintiff


v.


The Commonwealth of Redmont

Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF





I. PARTIES

1. Lex Titanum (Previously Titan Law) - Plaintiff
2. The Commonwealth Of Redmont - Defendant


II. FACTS

1. On November 22nd, 2024, Dodrio3 filed [2024] DCR 43 – Appeal.

2. There was no response or indication of the status of the case from the Federal Court until July 7th, 2025.

3. There was a gap of 227 days from when the case was filed until any response was given to the case by the Federal Court.

4. The Plaintiff has a right to an “unbiased verdict”

5. The Plaintiff could have received a 2.5% interest rate on £2000 through a Volt Savings Account. (P-001)

6. The Plaintiff had a direct financial stake in the appeal, as it concerned legal fees owed to the firm as stated in Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72.

7. The delay far exceeded any reasonable timeframe for initial judicial action, causing the Plaintiff financial harm.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The Federal Court Failed to provide an “unbiased verdict”, by taking an excessive amount of time to respond to the appeal.

2. The delay directly caused financial harm, depriving the Plaintiff of the ability to earn interest.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. $42,600 in punitive damages for the excess time (213 days) it took for the Federal Court to issue a judgment ($200/day)

2. $380 in lost interest (3.5% monthly) that the Plaintiff would have received if the judgment was made in a timely manner

3. Legal fees equal to 30% of the total monetary relief awarded in this case, regardless of the final amount granted


(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This (day) day of (month) (year)

P-001

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
DISMISSAL

This court sees the following issues with the case:

1. It was not filed properly. This case should have been an appeal to the Supreme Court within the limitations granted by law because you are appealing the result based on perceived bias.

2. There is a duty to mitigate on the part of the parties. While it took 8 months or so for the case to be heard, the plaintiff did not make a single motion in that time to make the court aware of the standstill and then waited 2 additional months before filing this case.

3. No claims for relief were cited by law.

For these reasons, the court will be dismissing this case.

Thank you for your time.