Lawsuit: Dismissed lawanoesepr v. Admin23 [2021] DCR 69

Status
Not open for further replies.
L

lawanoesepr

Doctor of Medicine, Internal Medicine
Supporter
Aventura Resident
3rd Anniversary 2nd Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls
lawanoesepr
lawanoesepr
Attorney
Joined
May 8, 2021
Messages
918
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION


lawanoesepr

Plaintiff


v.


Admin23

Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: After a long argument with my reputation being attacked. Many RBA board members now dislike me and some have been avoiding my law firm. I have been also financially hurt by these statements.


WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

After a long argument with my reputation being attacked. Many RBA board members now dislike me and some have been avoiding my law firm. I have been also financially hurt by these statements.



I. PARTIES

1. Admin23 (defendant)

2. lawanoesepr (plaintiff)


II. FACTS

1. The defendant kept slandering me as I was saying "I respect your opinion"

2. The defendant made a false statement

3. My reputation was in fact hurt by these statements.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Slander



IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. 100$ for slander

2. A public apology

3. 100$ for any clients that were prevented from coming to my law firm


UDbEP9Cr1v0qcbHul3Xss_LyrqssoBkyX2MCRCfwK7-5KqgwQLH37Dom9ahs5033pdcHMyC0CBXWAjilLhrwAS2petBlSKQd9FlQIvHvdwLecbWPBca9sBM2y7GHKqN6Av6qE40


7yWQ60kqQn1J-yHSuOG_8x8OT0QBDEjW4600S-JCsn9KyuG0EXIRUghIk3OsSPJSzsgaplPdeRAsOAW6BsJ1wI-L6D3DMMxzC0Vpw_0-nkGGONRJ-kE4LOCsW5oto8qT9_wDYcs
j_u3HaSCFZCQJclTY4v21uraF1kvLg278_8DQLHOfoGJ0ZZs-cCCZLyhxexllJpF01sIZVQxSjGfDjTWz-d-79HviNiSC-Im9D9zNGYA6nu_m5Zkl5ao0TgMYY4ef_38R4KCirI
oqaJv82iWDGGr4eSQE78HEZ-qhIGgo872V0FTbKqHbcmtvMBuB_7lAB6yllmzWq1l933XDIJchF9bjOBUF-StB7GcKsRqpP5nXWOoaiTrw_0g3mXapdszi8g04EguQBmkakPijY



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 30th day of October 2021
 
PwFVDhr.png


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The defendant is required to appear before the court in the case of lawanoesepr v. Admin23. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS



lawanoesepr
Plaintiff

v.

Admin23
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:



1. Fact 2 is incorrect as Defendant had screenshots to prove that Plaintiff had a lack of understanding of the definition of “advertisement”.

2. The one claim of relief that Plaintiff has furnished for the Court is not a claim, but rather a single word.

3. Plaintiff has almost certainly committed perjury as he has stated: “The defendant made a false statement” while Defendant has either stated an opinion, or a provable fact with screenshots, both of which Plaintiff knew of (as he included one of the screenshots sent by Defendant laying out how Plaintiff had not understood the definition of “advertisement”, which is at the bottom of Plaintiff’s 4th screenshot), and neither of which may be considered false statements or slander under the legal framework of the Commonwealth of Redmont.

4. This lawsuit is frivolous and has only been filed due to Plaintiff’s feelings being hurt and without any basis in law.

EVIDENCE
I hereby tender the following exhibits into evidence: (See attachments. They are screenshots from the RBA discord server and the Lovely Law Firm discord server.)


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 30th day of October, 2021.
 

Attachments

  • A48628FA-75C6-40DF-AAA6-CBFCEAFE6D17.png
    A48628FA-75C6-40DF-AAA6-CBFCEAFE6D17.png
    860.5 KB · Views: 213
  • F1102A60-D3E4-4F28-B781-CD872E0790AA.png
    F1102A60-D3E4-4F28-B781-CD872E0790AA.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 203
  • 8D6A2B29-05B5-445F-AFDA-EBF2D0E06D38.png
    8D6A2B29-05B5-445F-AFDA-EBF2D0E06D38.png
    1 MB · Views: 233
  • 5E8F7F6C-D9BA-4BC2-9EA1-E6B3AE4F4551.png
    5E8F7F6C-D9BA-4BC2-9EA1-E6B3AE4F4551.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 216
  • FC5150E0-AD7A-435D-AEC5-89B96F8F4238.jpeg
    FC5150E0-AD7A-435D-AEC5-89B96F8F4238.jpeg
    662.7 KB · Views: 223
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS



lawanoesepr
Plaintiff

v.

Admin23
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:



1. A lack of understanding of one thing does not mean that he cannot do another thing successfully. I'd like to note that my message saying "not a ad" was obviously a joke. And the defendant has attacked me for a joke and damaged my reputation

2. My claim is the defendant has broken the law slander and has caused my lose of income through my law firm.

3. This was never an opinion. Perjury has not been committed. It is not true as the Office of The attorney general has strict requirements that I have met. I have also fought quite a few cases. I have not broken the ethical doctorine. This all proves that the defendant statement is false.

4. This lawsuit has been filed under financial loss

5. The defendant has presented new facts. The motion to dismiss should be denied on this ground.




By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
 
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

OPENING STATEMENT


1. The defendant has harmed my personal reputation and my law firms reputation with false statements.

2. I have lost a couple clients due to these statements.

3. The defendant has no proof of me being a bad lawyer other than a advertisement encouraging people to join the office of the attorney general and me jokingly saying it wasn't a advertisement. The defendant proceeded to tell the people in the server that I did not know what advertisement means and claiming I was a bad lawyer

4. He proceeded to take this to the RBA discord effectively ruining my reputation within the legal community

REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION
Due to the crippling reputation of the plaintiff and slanderous remarks made by the defendant The plaintiff asks for a emergency injunction to order the defendant to refrain from making slanderous remarks about the plaintiff until a verdict is reached.
 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT


1. For Plaintiff to have any case, he must prove two things. The first being that the statements made by Defendant were purposely damaging the reputation of Plaintiff. The second being that those statements were untrue. Plaintiff has not specified any statements that were untrue or that were purposely damaging to Plaintiff’s reputation.

2. Opinions are not factual statements. Saying that I would hope Plaintiff does not have to write legal documents or go to trial can not be a false or true statement as far as proof goes. It is merely an opinion. I do not need proof to back up an opinion that Plaintiff wouldn’t be a quality lawyer. I am also not forcing or guiding people away from a law firm. I had no idea that Plaintiff had a law firm until after the statements were made.

3. Plaintiff had stated after the fact that his statements were “obviously a joke” yet it was not obvious to anyone present in the conversation. Plaintiff had many opportunities to make this clear and had not used any of those opportunities to make it clear.

4. Plaintiff had stated in their Motion to Dismiss: “Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed…”. Plaintiff is furnishing more proof that he produces low quality work which bolsters Defendant’s statement:
“I hope you don’t have to go to court or write any documents up then, for the sake of your clients”
as Plaintiff, who is representing himself, has done himself a disservice in this Court.

5. This is a use of the court system to punish people who have hurt Plaintiff’s feelings and that Plaintiff dislikes, and has shown in the past that he will do this. (e.g. Case 08-2021-22)
 
I object,
The defendant has just committed perjury by saying this " I had no idea that Plaintiff had a law firm until after the statements were made." Because you need a law firm to have a client I will also be submitting a screenshot. In the screenshot a random user says the name of my law firm in the chat.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20211031-113925.jpg
    Screenshot_20211031-113925.jpg
    340.5 KB · Views: 202
REBUTTAL

I thought Plaintiff was working for the Office of the Attorney General and that was who Plaintiff was advertising for. The Government gets sued a lot so I figured Plaintiff was hiring to compensate for more lawsuits or something along those lines. Plaintiff never specified he was hiring for a law firm in his advertisement, which unfortunately, has been deleted so I have no screenshot of the original advertisement.
 
District Court.png

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@JoeGamer and @Alexander P. Love are hereby summoned to the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont in Case No. 10-2021-30 as witnesses. They have 48 hours to appear. Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present. You will receive questions from the party that called you, and you may also be cross-examined.

I am hereby informing each witness to ensure they are aware of the provisions of the law of perjury and its severity. Giving knowingly false testimony is highly illegal. Witnesses are required to tell the truth in their testimonies, pursuant of the Perjury Act.

Once the witnesses have been questioned, the opposing party will have the opportunity to cross-examine.​
 
Thank you JoeGamer. The Plaintiff has 48 hours to ask his question(s) to the witness, then the Defendant will have 48 hours to cross-examine the witness. After this witness has been questioned, assuming Alexander Love has appeared before the court, the Defendanet will have 48 hours to question Alexander Love, and the Plaintiff will have 48 hours to cross-examine him.
 
Your honor,

With all due respect, answering this question could undermind my position as the Attorney General in the Redmont Bar Association. I hold the vote in the RBA, and giving an opinion in favor of the other could hurt my integrity of holding council elections. In the evidence provided, you can clearly see me joking around. Why? I don't want to get involved with situations against two lawyers, especially one where character or conduct are in question. Providing a response then could threaten my integrity to the board, and now could threaten my integrity. So, your honor, I respectfully pled my fifth amendment.
 
1. I believe the word of the defendant were not respectful, however, I do not inherently agree or disagree with their statement. I believe some of the conclusions that the defendant made in this discussion were fowl, but don't agree or disagree with them.
 
JoeGamer, could you tell, at the time, if they were posed as the personal opinion of Defendant or if they were posed as concrete facts? I would ask that you look at the evidence again to refresh your memory if needed.

I have one more question that I will ask depending on how JoeGamer answers, Your Honor.
 
Your honor, I request Admin23 please rephrase their question. The question is very unclear, and cannot answer clearly to a question that I do not know what is being asked.
 
I'll go over all the statements in the evidence to better answer the question.
1636496139627.png

The first point is a restating of lawanoesepr claim. The second is second point is stated as a fact, however, it's not evidently clear if this is an actual fact.

1636496232103.png

This is clearly an opinion of Admin23 as it does not hold any factual bases. While it may be a good thing, this is not a fact.

1636496337619.png

Another opinion of Admin23

1636496427105.png

This statement is also an opinion
 
Thank you for your time, JoeGamer.

I have no further questions for JoeGamer, your Honor.

For AlexanderLove:

1) As you have been lawanoesepr’s former employer and has seen his quality of work, would you, as an experienced professional, recommend him to a client if they needed a lawyer and were looking for one?

2) You have been sued by lawanoesepr previously due to his termination as your employee, and you have seen his lawsuits against various different entities and people. How would you describe the general theme of his lawsuits?
 
1) Absolutely not. His writing no where near meets the cut for good quality work. He has also committed corporate espionage against the Lovely Law Firm in the past while double crossing the former Attorney General, as proven in lawanoesepr v. AlexanderLove. It’s clear he’s unethical as well.

2) His lawsuits seem to be intended to annoy or get revenge on those who tell the truth about him. I was sued for exposing him for corporate espionage. You now are being sued for exposing his lapse in understanding of an arguably easy definition.
 
Your Honor, could we speed up this trial? It seems that Plaintiff is dragging his feet to draw out this trial. He has not participated in this trial for thirteen days and he failed to say anything about cross examining AlexanderLove when he had the chance. He could have even said he has no questions, but he said nothing.
 
The Plaintiff has less than 24 hours to post his closing statement. This is the last time the Plaintiff is required to post anything to the forums for this case, so it will no longer be an issue. However the Plaintiff's disrespect by not posting when he should have has been noted, and failure to post his closing statement in time will result in a contempt of court charge.
 
Good morning, your Honor. I would like to note for the record that opposing counsel is not present in court today.

The Plaintiff sued me for slander due to my comments made in the Redmont Bar Association Discord server, specifically in the channel for lawyers. This is why we are here today.

For the purposes of this court, “slander” is defined as:
“A purposeful false statement of a player to cause damage to that player's reputation.”

The two parts needed to successfully prove slander are:
1. Purposefully stating something false; and

2. Intentionally stating that false thing to cause damage to the player’s reputation.

The Plaintiff has not proven either.

In the channel for lawyers, I stated:
“I hope you don’t have to go to court or write any documents up then, for the sake of your clients.”

To this, the Plaintiff responded:
“You are hurting my reputation and no it is not true. Thats slander [SIC]”

My statements concerning the Plaintiff’s competency were made after the Plaintiff entered into the Lovely Law Firm’s Discord server in order to advertise his competing legal services, and were based on the direct testimony of others who are qualified to assess his level of competency as an attorney, including his former employer who testified in this Court. His former employer stated in this court that the Plaintiff’s “writing no where near meets the cut for good quality work.”

In support of his former employer’s testimony, I would like to draw the court’s attention to the Plaintiff’s response to me, the Defendant, on the Discord server quoted above. The Court will notice multiple missing punctuation marks in his two sentence response. The missing punctuation marks include two commas, a period, and an apostrophe.

For my statements to be slander, the statements have to categorically untrue. My statements, calling into question his competency are further supported by the fact that he didn’t show up to court today, even when his reputation is on the line.

Furthermore, I did not intend to damage the Plaintiff’s reputation. If I had intended that, I would have made my statements in the RBA channel for non-lawyers because that’s where his clients would come from.

In summary, the Plaintiff falls short in making his case for slander on both points outlined above. Addressing point one, I, the Defendant, did not state something false. In order for the second point to hold relevance, point one has to be proven true first. However, for the sake of this Court, I would like to add that I, the Defendant, did not state my comments (truthful though they were) in order to cause damage to the Plaintiff’s reputation.
Lastly, I would like to petition the court to modify the Court’s legal definition of “slander”, as it would more appropriately be defined as “libel” due to its written, and not spoken, nature.
 
Last edited:

Verdict


I will be dismissing this case with prejudice as the Plaintiff has failed to respond to the court in over 100 hours. As it's the Plaintiff's responsibility to pursue the case, his disregard in this court case will result in his claims being disregarded. I hope that the Plaintiff has respect for the court and all other parties involved in any future case that he's involved in.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top