Lawsuit: Dismissed kvogt2340 v. NavyGoober197 [2024] FCR 53

[Dr_Eksplosive]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION



kvogt2340 (Lovely Incorporated representing)

Plaintiff


v.


NavyGoober197

Defendant




COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:



WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 3rd of March in this year, the plaintiff came to their home and noticed that 5 of their dogs were slaughtered. The plaintiff rightfully requested to see the logs from staff and discovered that NavyGoober197 killed them all. This meant that the defendant was trespassing on the plaintiff's property. This has caused a lot of emotional distress and inconvenience for the plaintiff.



I. PARTIES

kvogt2340 (Lovely Incorporated representing)

NavyGoober197


II. FACTS

The plaintiff has a strong attachment to their wolves.

The plaintiff's five wolves were murdered by NavyGoober197.

The defendant had to have trespassed in order to conduct these murders.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. The killing of the wolves left an impact emotional trauma for our client. No amount of wolves will ever replace what he lost in those friends due to this emotional damages are warranted.

2. In order to compensate for the lives of the wolves that were taken from the Defendant, consequential damages should be further awarded.

3. 5 Wolves had their lives snuffed out that day. This is a clear breach of Law 9.4 for Animal Murder and thus punitive damages should be awarded.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

$25000 in consequential emotional damages., 5000 per wolf slain.

$15000 in punitive damages

$5000 in consequential damages to purchase new wolves

$13500 (30 percent) be given as legal fees.




By making this submission, I agree, I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This 13th day of April, 2024

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Proof of Representation:

 

[RelaxedGV]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@NavyGoober197 is required to appear before the court in the case of kvogt2340 v. NavyGoober197. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favour of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Your Honor,

Apologies for speaking out of term, but the Defendant has failed to appear within the allotted time and more. In the interest of a speedy trial for my client, may we please move on?

 

[RelaxedGV]

Due to the Defense being legally inactive (under 6 hours) I will be bringing a PD into this case to defend them.

The Court will be in recess pending a PD.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Due to the recent assignment of a Public Defender, they have 72 hours to file an answer to complaint and if they wish, a Motion to Dismiss. @ColonelKai

 

[ColonelKai]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT​

---

kvogt2340 (Lovely Incorporated representing)
Plaintiff

v.

NavyGoober197
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
We neither affirm or deny that the plaintiff has a strong attachment to their wolves.

We neither affirm or deny that the plaintiff's five wolves were murdered by NavyGoober197.

We neither affirm or deny that the defendant had to have trespassed in order to conduct these murders.

II. DEFENCES
1. The defense will await the discovery process to make their arguments.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This fourth day of May, 2024.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Thank you, we will now be moving into Discovery. This will last a period of 7 days.
Please remind yourselves of the rules for submission:

Rule 4.1 (Scope and Purpose of Discovery)​

The scope and purpose of Discovery is to allow all material to enter the court prior to the beginning of arguments for the sake of fairness. It is to enable fairness by allowing the parties to view the information so that they may properly formulate their legal arguments. Presiding judges shall be guided by this principle.

Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use)​

All material used in legal arguments must have either been included in the case prior to the submission. Material must have been included within the complaint, within the answer, within an amendment to a complaint, within an amendment to an answer, or within a discovery submission. Otherwise the material will be deemed inadmissible and the argument can be voided by the presiding judge.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Due to Discovery now being over, we will be moving into Opening Statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to provide theirs.

 

[ColonelKai]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS​

---

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges;

The prosecution has failed to provide any proof during their complaint or the designated discovery period, nor have they designated a witness. Therefore, we wish to file for a motion to dismiss to the honourable court under the Court Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim).

DATED: This 12th day of May, 2024.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Plaintiff has 48 hours to provide a response to the Motion to Dismiss.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Your Honour,

I'd like to inform the Court that I no longer work for Lovely Law and have not worked for the firm for 2 weeks. I am not aware of the measures the firm will be taking to represent the Plaintiff, but I will no longer be representing the Plaintiff or the Lovely Law Firm in any official capacity.

Thank you for your time.

 

[RelaxedGV]

Your Honour,

I'd like to inform the Court that I no longer work for Lovely Law and have not worked for the firm for 2 weeks. I am not aware of the measures the firm will be taking to represent the Plaintiff, but I will no longer be representing the Plaintiff or the Lovely Law Firm in any official capacity.

Thank you for your time.

Regardless, the Plaintiff has failed to provide a response to the Motion to Dismiss however I will not be charging Contempt given the change in the attorney responsible and that a response is not required.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS​

---

The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges;

The prosecution has failed to provide any proof during their complaint or the designated discovery period, nor have they designated a witness. Therefore, we wish to file for a motion to dismiss to the honourable court under the Court Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim).

DATED: This 12th day of May, 2024.

This is a very short ruling on this Motion to Dismiss as yes, the Plaintiff failed to provide any evidence or witnesses to prove their case. The burden of proof is placed upon the Plaintiff and with none being provided other than a statement from the Plaintiff, I am inclined to accept the Motion to Dismiss.

Given the above, I am granting the Motion to Dismiss and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

The Federal Court thanks all involved.