Justice Compass, Ltd. v Commonwealth of Redmont

[Dartanboy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Justice Compass, Ltd. (CEO Dartanboy representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Justice Compass, Ltd. worked a long, difficult case that, under the law, requires legal fees to be paid. Furthermore, the Federal Court ordered that the DHS ensure these legal fees be paid.

The Commonwealth has refused to fulfill their duty, and refused to comply with the Court Order.

I. PARTIES
1. Justice Compass, Ltd. (Plaintiff).
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant).

II. FACTS
1. On October 26, 2022, the Former Honorable Judge dygyee ordered "the DOJ to fine the NotGamerrr $5,500 and unfine Crxka the same amount" [Exhibit P-003].
2. On December 26, 2022, the Former Honorable Judge dygyee ordered the $5,500 to be transferred again due to the Commonwealth failing to action the verdict initially (plus $200 in legal fees), resulting in a total of $11,200 being awarded [Exhibit P-004].
3. On September 12, 2025, the Honorable Judge AmityBlamity issued a verdict in the case of Lawsuit: Adjourned - Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32 [Exhibit P-001]
4. The aforementioned verdict required the Department of Homeland Security unfine Justice Compass $2,790,000 [Exhibit P-001].
5. On September 24, 2025, Justice Compass, Ltd. reached out to the Department of Homeland Security, asking when the verdict was going to be actioned [Exhibit P-002].
6. Shortly thereafter, Secretary Angryhamdog informed Justice Compass that they did not intend to follow the court order [Exhibit P-002].

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Disobedience of Court Order (Constitutional Violation - Ignoring the Court's Judicial Power) - In Lawsuit: Adjourned - Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32, the Federal Court ordered the DHS "to unfine ... [Justice Compass, Ltd.] $2,790,000". The DHS has informed me they are not going to do this.
2. Constitutional Rights Violation - The Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable seizure. For all intents and purposes, the Commonwealth has seized $2,790,000 from my company, and by extension, from me. They have done this without a legal cause.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Commonwealth be compelled to pay me the already-ordered $2,790,000.
2. $837,000 in Legal Fees, per the Legal Damages Act.

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32'

Apr 1, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Vanguard & Co (Justice Compass Law Firm representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Naezaratheus
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Naezaratheus, has committed a tremendous fraud – much larger, I believe, than the likes of any other crime we’ve seen in the history of the great Commonwealth of Redmont. Throughout the last two weeks or so, Naezaratheus has disregarded all common-sense decencies, abandoned moral justice, and most importantly, blatantly chose to...

• Dartanboy
• Replies: 67
• Forum: Case Archive

• 
• 

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002] [ATTACH type="full" width="800px" size="1302x695

62784[/ATTACH]

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Crxka v. NotGamerrr [2022] FCR 86'

Oct 20, 2022

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION



Crxka (Represented by Solid Law Firm)
Plaintiff

v.

NotGamerrr
Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Your honor,

On October 4, 2022, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff concerning the construction of a building. As part of the contract, the Defendant agreed to pay for the construction by October 19, 2022. The Defendant breached the contract and did not pay the Plaintiff.


I. PARTIES

1. Crxka
2. NotGamerrr


II. FACTS

1...

• KermieTheP0tat0
• Replies: 8
• Forum: Case Archive

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Crxka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 103'

Dec 23, 2022

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Crxka (represented by pepper5980)
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT:
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

So basically from the previous case I built a player his house but he didn’t pay me so I sued him and then the judge ruled that the player was fined $5500 and that I was to be given $5500 but it has been 2 months and I have tried to contact DOJ but they are claiming that they paid me when I never did if I were to receive the money I would have gotten a mail...

• pepper5980
• Replies: 3
• Forum: Case Archive

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 24th day of September 2025.

Motion

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

This case has extraordinary similarity to Lawsuit: Adjourned - Crxka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 103, where the Commonwealth had chosen not to carry out a fine-and-unfine court order.

Essentially, this case has already been decided by the Federal Court, and there is no need to litigate it again.