Lawsuit: In Session Justice Compass, Ltd. v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 98

[Dartanboy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Justice Compass, Ltd. (CEO Dartanboy representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Justice Compass, Ltd. worked a long, difficult case that, under the law, requires legal fees to be paid. Furthermore, the Federal Court ordered that the DHS ensure these legal fees be paid.

The Commonwealth has refused to fulfill their duty, and refused to comply with the Court Order.

I. PARTIES
1. Justice Compass, Ltd. (Plaintiff).
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Defendant).

II. FACTS
1. On October 26, 2022, the Former Honorable Judge dygyee ordered "the DOJ to fine the NotGamerrr $5,500 and unfine Crxka the same amount" [Exhibit P-003].
2. On December 26, 2022, the Former Honorable Judge dygyee ordered the $5,500 to be transferred again due to the Commonwealth failing to action the verdict initially (plus $200 in legal fees), resulting in a total of $11,200 being awarded [Exhibit P-004].
3. On September 12, 2025, the Honorable Judge AmityBlamity issued a verdict in the case of Lawsuit: Adjourned - Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32 [Exhibit P-001]
4. The aforementioned verdict required the Department of Homeland Security unfine Justice Compass $2,790,000 [Exhibit P-001].
5. On September 24, 2025, Justice Compass, Ltd. reached out to the Department of Homeland Security, asking when the verdict was going to be actioned [Exhibit P-002].
6. Shortly thereafter, Secretary Angryhamdog informed Justice Compass that they did not intend to follow the court order [Exhibit P-002].

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Disobedience of Court Order (Constitutional Violation - Ignoring the Court's Judicial Power) - In Lawsuit: Adjourned - Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32, the Federal Court ordered the DHS "to unfine ... [Justice Compass, Ltd.] $2,790,000". The DHS has informed me they are not going to do this.
2. Constitutional Rights Violation - The Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable seizure. For all intents and purposes, the Commonwealth has seized $2,790,000 from my company, and by extension, from me. They have done this without a legal cause.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Commonwealth be compelled to pay me the already-ordered $2,790,000.
2. $837,000 in Legal Fees, per the Legal Damages Act.

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Vanguard & Co v. Naezaratheus [2025] FCR 32'

Apr 1, 2025

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Vanguard & Co (Justice Compass Law Firm representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Naezaratheus
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant, Naezaratheus, has committed a tremendous fraud – much larger, I believe, than the likes of any other crime we’ve seen in the history of the great Commonwealth of Redmont. Throughout the last two weeks or so, Naezaratheus has disregarded all common-sense decencies, abandoned moral justice, and most importantly, blatantly chose to...

• Dartanboy
• Replies: 67
• Forum: Case Archive

• 
• 

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002] [ATTACH type="full" width="800px" size="1302x695

62784[/ATTACH]

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Crxka v. NotGamerrr [2022] FCR 86'

Oct 20, 2022

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

CIVIL ACTION



Crxka (Represented by Solid Law Firm)
Plaintiff

v.

NotGamerrr
Defendant


COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

Your honor,

On October 4, 2022, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff concerning the construction of a building. As part of the contract, the Defendant agreed to pay for the construction by October 19, 2022. The Defendant breached the contract and did not pay the Plaintiff.


I. PARTIES

1. Crxka
2. NotGamerrr


II. FACTS

1...

• KermieTheP0tat0
• Replies: 8
• Forum: Case Archive

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'Crxka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 103'

Dec 23, 2022

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Crxka (represented by pepper5980)
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT:
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

So basically from the previous case I built a player his house but he didn’t pay me so I sued him and then the judge ruled that the player was fined $5500 and that I was to be given $5500 but it has been 2 months and I have tried to contact DOJ but they are claiming that they paid me when I never did if I were to receive the money I would have gotten a mail...

• pepper5980
• Replies: 3
• Forum: Case Archive

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 24th day of September 2025.

Motion

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

This case has extraordinary similarity to Lawsuit: Adjourned - Crxka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 103, where the Commonwealth had chosen not to carry out a fine-and-unfine court order.

Essentially, this case has already been decided by the Federal Court, and there is no need to litigate it again.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, it appears Exhibit P-002 did not enter into the spoiler correctly, however, it is still attached to the post as an attachment.

May I fix the error?

 

[xtub12345]

Writ of Summons

@asexualdinosaur , is required to appear before the federal Court in the case of Justice Compass, Ltd. v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 98

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[xtub12345]

Your honor, it appears Exhibit P-002 did not enter into the spoiler correctly, however, it is still attached to the post as an attachment.

May I fix the error?

You may.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

I have arrived, the Commonwealth requests to respond to the motion for default judgement

 

[xtub12345]

I have arrived, the Commonwealth requests to respond to the motion for default judgement

You may, please ensure that you file an answer to complaint within the time frame

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Justice Compass, Ltd. (CEO Dartanboy representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. Affirm
2. Affirm
3. Affirm
4. Affirm, noting the verdict ALSO required that the defendant was fined for the same amount.
5. Affirm
6. Deny

II. DEFENCES
1. While the court may have ordered an unfining of a certain value of money, it also required that the fining of the same value was to be issued. The DHS is acting as the executor of the order, the commonwealth is not responsible for the debts of citizens. The DHS actioned the order to the best of their ability.
2. In situations like these in the past the DHS would track the debts of users and get the funds later or issue warrants to liquidate properties or other assets. These avenues have already been exhausted and there’s no more funds to procure.
3. The plaintiff failed to utilize certain tools and procedures that may have prevented the harm they’re facing currently, in the form of an Emergency Injunction. No EI was ever filed in this case despite the claims and alleged fraud of funds against the defendant which might have protected the funds from being dispersed.
4. Somewhat ironically, the funds claimed by the DHS were used in this appeal (also by the plaintiff) prior to the verdict issued in the relevant case.
5. Dartanman is not a newbie lawyer, the concept of an emergency injunction is something they’re very familiar with.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 2nd day of OCT 2025

Brief

Your honor,

While the case may appear to be similar it should be noted that the linked case went to a default judgement and the Commonwealth was not able to provide any evidence or reasoning for what had happened. It’s unclear whether or not the Commonwealth had actually paid the fine or not, and so it was assumed they hadn’t and ordered it to take place.

In contrast to this case- the DHS isn’t refusing to enact on an order, they’re simply unable to enact on an order. The facts of this case surround whether or not the language of the judicial officer is to be taken in a very literal manner and if the Commonwealth is liable for the debts of its citizens, or if the language is complimentary to the process and not literal and that the Commonwealth is not liable for the debts of its citizens.

As such the Commonwealth suggests that this case has NOT been litigated already, and we seek to provide evidence and explanation to support our claims that the court should not force the Commonwealth into an impossible situation.

Thank you.

 

[Dartanboy]

Somewhat ironically, the funds claimed by the DHS were used in this appeal (also by the plaintiff) prior to the verdict issued in the relevant case.

Objection

PERJURY

I represented the Plaintiff in the mentioned case, however, I was not the Plaintiff.

 

[xtub12345]

I will be denying the motion for default judgement, in addition to claim 1, in claim 2 it is alleged that the actions of the commonwealth have constituted a Constitutional Rights Violation, and as this was not contested in Crxka v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 103, this case has not already been litigated.

 

[xtub12345]

Objection

PERJURY

I represented the Plaintiff in the mentioned case, however, I was not the Plaintiff.

I will be overruling this objection, perjury requires evidence that incorrect statement was made knowingly.

 

[xtub12345]

We will be entering discovery for a period of 5 days, I'd like to remind both parties of the Court Rules and Procedures related to discovery.

 

[Dartanboy]

I will be overruling this objection, perjury requires evidence that incorrect statement was made knowingly.

Motion

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your honor, there is no alternative explanation. Clearly, the Commonwealth is able to read and write as they found the case and have written posts in this one.

They are clearly aware of the case previously mentioned, as they linked to it.

They're even aware of the intricacies of that case, as they made a claim regarding how it was handled.

There is no alternative (reasonable) explanation for the false statement.

They knew the truth, and lied to the court.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Motion

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Your honor, there is no alternative explanation. Clearly, the Commonwealth is able to read and write as they found the case and have written posts in this one.

They are clearly aware of the case previously mentioned, as they linked to it.

They're even aware of the intricacies of that case, as they made a claim regarding how it was handled.

There is no alternative (reasonable) explanation for the false statement.

They knew the truth, and lied to the court.

Apologies to the court for the interruption, but I feel compelled to assure all parties this was a simple mistake, and request the court allow me to amend the answer as such to say 'by Plaintiff's counsel'

I assume this is satisfactory for opposing counsel to allow things to move forward.