Lawsuit: Pending jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

J

jsrkiwi

Citizen
Homeland Security Department
Commerce Department
Supporter
jsrkiwi
jsrkiwi
Recruit
Joined
Aug 27, 2025
Messages
39

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

jsrkiwi
Plaintiff

v.

Trentrick_Lamar
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Defendant unlawfully killed me sixteen seconds after I had tasered and cuffed him, then immediately uncuffed him. The Defendant claims self-defence, but the circumstances clearly show intentional lethal action after being restrained and released.

Separately, in a DHS ticket, the Defendant called me “an absolute liar” and told me to “stop lying,” in front of multiple Government personnel. These statements were false and intended to discredit me professionally.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. The Plaintiff is jsrkiwi.
2. The Defendant is Trentrick_Lamar.

II. FACTS
1. On 9th November 2025, the Plaintiff, acting in his capacity as a Police Recruit, attempted to apprehend Urb5n, a mass murderer wanted by police.
2. Urb5n was hiding in room CE102 at the university.
3. On the first attempt at arrest of Urb5n by the Plaintiff, Urb5n exited the room and proceeded to murder the Plaintiff further down the corridor at 19:11:54 UTC.
4. The Plaintiff immediately returned to the university to attempt a second arrest. On this second attempt at arrest of Urb5n by the Plaintiff, Urb5n used the Defendant as a human shield to avoid arrest.
5. At 19:12:31 UTC, the Plaintiff tasered the Defendant, whilst attempting to taser Urb5n.
6. At 19:12:32 UTC, the Plaintiff cuffed the Defendant, whilst attempting to cuff Urb5n.
7. Two seconds later at 19:12:34 UTC, the Plaintiff realised his error and uncuffed the Defendant.
8. The Plaintiff started typing out an apology message, however this was interrupted because sixteen seconds later after being uncuffed, at 19:12:50 UTC, the Defendant murdered the Plaintiff.
9. The Defendant faced no imminent threat from the Plaintiff. The plaintiff was motionless and was not holding a weapon.
10. The Defendant cannot claim self-defence, as there never was a threat of harm against the Defendant, and certainly none once 16 seconds had elapsed from after the Plaintiff had uncuffed him.
11. The Plaintiff’s armour was damaged by the Murder, as evidenced by exhibit 3.
12. The Plaintiff returned to the University to collect the clues from both murders, and in his capacity of a Detective solved the murder case stated in Fact 8 at 19:15:07 UTC, and solved the murder case stated in Fact 3 at 19:15:27 UTC.
13. The Plaintiff then arrested the Defendant at 19:17:15 UTC, read him his rights at 19:17:23 UTC, imprisoned him at 19:17:36 UTC.
14. At 19:19 UTC, the Defendant opened government ticket dhs-25340 with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
15. At 19:20 UTC, the Defendant posted a screenshot to the ticket purporting to show ‘self-defence’.
16. At 19:22 UTC, the Plaintiff responded with a factually accurate witness statement.
17. At 19:22 UTC, the Defendant responded “Absolute liar. I have a witness. | I would like Dolev added to this ticket. | He has your head that I tossed. | @Secretary | Dolev is even there in my screenshot standing right in front of me | Jsr, stop lying. Urbsn was not there. It was Dolev who was there, and he is literally right there in my screenshot.| Urbsn and Dolev do not have the same skin”. (n.b. “|” has been used instead of a new line).
18. These statements were made in the presence of third parties, including (for example) roryyy_, Dolev, Comet, and Culls.
19. Under the No More Defamation Act, false statements constitute Slander.
20. The Defendant provided no evidential basis for alleging that the Plaintiff lied.
21. Under the Legal Damages Act, each act of unlawful defamation permits a damages award.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant unlawfully killed the Plaintiff when no imminent threat of harm against the Plaintiff existed. Therefore, the Defendant committed the criminal act of Murder.
2. Upon these facts the Defendant is civilly liable for the unlawful killing and the Plaintiff claims compensatory damages under the Legal Damages Act.
3. The Defendant’s written statements constitute slander: “A false statement, usually made through either discord or in-game messages, which defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization”.
4. The Defendant’s actions fulfil the elements of the tort under the No More Defamation Act, as the accusation (“liar”) was made as a statement of fact, not opinion, and injured the Plaintiff’s professional reputation.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following:
1. A declarative judgement finding that the Defendant murdered the Plaintiff.
2. $1 nominal compensatory damages for Murder.
3. A declarative judgement that the Defendant slandered the Plaintiff.
4. An order that the Defendant retract the defamatory claim by way of public statement, and apologise to the Plaintiff.
5. $1 nominal compensatory damages for Slander.

V. ATTACHED EVIDENCE
1. Transcript of government ticket dhs-25340, showing the defamatory statements.
2. Logs excerpt from 9th November 2025 between 19:11:00 UTC and 19:18:00 UTC, showing that the Plaintiff did not lie.
3. Screenshot showing damage to the Plaintiff’s armour.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 9th day of November 2025

 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

The Plaintiff, jsrkiwi, respectfully moves this Court to order Defendant, Trentrick_Lamar, to preserve all Minecraft logs covering at least the period 19:11:00 UTC to 19:18:00 UTC on 9th November 2025, and in support thereof states as follows:

1. The Plaintiff has initiated a civil action against the Defendant in this Court concerning events that occurred on the DemocracyCraft Minecraft server during the above-stated period.
2. The logs maintained by the Defendant are likely to contain evidence relevant to the Plaintiff’s claims and the Defendant’s conduct.
3. Immediate preservation of these logs is necessary to prevent spoliation of evidence, as such digital records are susceptible to automatic deletion or alteration prior to the opening of discovery.
4. Without the preservation of these records, the Plaintiff’s ability to present relevant evidence and support the claims in this case will be materially impaired.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court issue an order requiring Defendant Trentrick_Lamar to:
1. Preserve all Minecraft logs covering at least the period 19:11:00 UTC to 19:18:00 UTC on 9th November 2025; and
2. Refrain from deleting, modifying, or altering any such records until further order of this Court.

 

Writ of Summons

@Trentrick_Lamar , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.


Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
jsrkiwi said:

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE

The Plaintiff, jsrkiwi, respectfully moves this Court to order Defendant, Trentrick_Lamar, to preserve all Minecraft logs covering at least the period 19:11:00 UTC to 19:18:00 UTC on 9th November 2025, and in support thereof states as follows:

1. The Plaintiff has initiated a civil action against the Defendant in this Court concerning events that occurred on the DemocracyCraft Minecraft server during the above-stated period.
2. The logs maintained by the Defendant are likely to contain evidence relevant to the Plaintiff’s claims and the Defendant’s conduct.
3. Immediate preservation of these logs is necessary to prevent spoliation of evidence, as such digital records are susceptible to automatic deletion or alteration prior to the opening of discovery.
4. Without the preservation of these records, the Plaintiff’s ability to present relevant evidence and support the claims in this case will be materially impaired.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court issue an order requiring Defendant Trentrick_Lamar to:
1. Preserve all Minecraft logs covering at least the period 19:11:00 UTC to 19:18:00 UTC on 9th November 2025; and
2. Refrain from deleting, modifying, or altering any such records until further order of this Court.

Click to expand...

Granted. Defendant shall preserve logs as described.
 
Your Honor,

MZLD will be representing the Defendant.
1762734055965.png
 
@Rory (@Kaiserin_ , courtesy ping in case DoJ can answer on behalf of DHS).

Interrogatory by the Court: Are DHS tickets inherently classified when initially filed?
 
Your honour,

To ignore any other concerns about privacy and confidentiality - no, DHS tickets are not automatically assigned a classification status when opened.
 

Court Order


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Sua Sponte Dismissal of Complaint in Part.


Prayer #1 is dismissed with prejudice. This Court is not equipped to issue declaratory judgements of summary offenses that occurred outside of its purview. A declaratory judgement of this nature may impart a duty on this Court to affirm actions that have otherwise been adjudicated by the DHS. This Court has a duty to hear appeals on DHS actions, this Court will never make a declaratory judgment in a civil proceeding affirming a criminal action.

So ordered,
Magistrate Mug



 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top