Lawsuit: Dismissed JediAJMan v. Department of Justice [2023] FCR 85

[ko531]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

JediAJMan (ko531 representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Justice
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

JediAJMan was being harassed by FoniWeiss (Verified by the District Court - Evidence A). Jedi talked the xAntho_ny who is a police officer about the harassment and Anthony admits to seeing the Harassment(Evidence B). When FoniWeiss approach JediAJMan after just murderering and harassing them(Evidence C). Jedi felt a danger for their own life and felt the need to use lethal force. After using lethal force FoniWeiss used /complaint on Jedi. Jedi then opened a DOJ ticket asking for help against the Harassment and to have the wanted point removed. The DOJ failed to reply for 4 hours.(Evidence D) During the time FoniWeiss killed Jedi again causing them to go to jail and serve a 10 minute sentence. During the 10 minute sentence FoniWeiss broke into the prison and murdered Jedi 3 more times. FoniWeiss even went on to verbally harass Jedi in Global chat (Evidence E) and in Jedi's lawsuit against FoniWeiss (Evidence A). Jedi believes that he has meet the burden of proof for Self Defense, the DOJ tells him otherwise and goes on to say that if he disagrees, then sue them (Evidence F).


I. PARTIES
1. JediAJman
2. FoniWeiss
3. xAntho_ny
4. Department of Justice

II. FACTS
1. Jedi was being harassed by FoniWeiss
2. Jedi went to Anthony, who is a police officer, and asked for help and has anthony verifed that he sees the harassment
2. Jedi killed FoniWeiss in self defense
3. Jedi opened a DOJ ticket asking for help with the harassment and to have the wanted point removed due to self defense
4. the DOJ failed to answer for 4 hours
5. Jedi was killed again by FoniWeiss causing them to be arrested
6. Jedi and his legal representation talks about how they were being harassed and ask for the murder to be removed from his record since it was self defense
7. The DOJ tells Jedi no and that if he disagrees "sue us"

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. From the Legal Damages Act , Emotional Damages are defined as “Situations in which a person suffers psychological harm due to an entity's negligent or intentional actions.” JediAJMan is entitled to Emotional Damages as they suffered distress as a result of Department of Justice’s actions.
2. From the Legal Damages Act, Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont is defined as "situations in which an injured party loses their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm." JediAJMan is entitled to Los of enjoyment in Redmont as they were prevented to play while being in jail and also had to argue their case for self defense in DOJ tickets for multiple days.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $5000 Emotional Damages
2. $3000 Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont
3. $2000 Lega fees
4. Murder charge removed from Jedi's criminal record

V. EVIDENCE

Evidence A

Lawsuit: Adjourned - JediAJMan v. FoniWeiss [2023] DCR 29

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION JediAJMan (ko531 representing) Plaintiff v. FoniWeiss Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: On September 10th the defendent FoniWeiss harassed JediAJMan multiple times by killing him...

www.democracycraft.net

Evidence B

Evidence C

*Note* Evidence C was taken by me and Evidence B and D were taken by JediAJMan and that is why the times are off as Jedi lives an hour ahead of me.

Evidence D

Evidence E

Evidence F

*Note to Staff* We understand the simular case BenTDM v. Commonwealth of Redmont that was Owner Vetoed. We are not arguing the same arguements, We are not saying that the plugin was wrong or that Jedi didn't murder FoniWeiss. We are arguing that Jedi has reached the burden of proof for Self Defense. The DOJ Allows people to prove self defense if charged with murder so nothing about this case should be Owner Vetoed.

 

[drew_hall]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

The Commonwealth of Redmont is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of JediAJMan v. Department of Justice.

Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[Alexander P. Love]

Objection, Your Honor
I motion to block the admission of exhibit A into evidence as the cited case is civil. It indicates a preponderance of the evidence, or balance of probabilities, and does not prove any fact or claim beyond a reasonable doubt. It is therefore speculation to use a case with such a burden of proof as evidence of a fact.

Objection, Your Honor
I motion to block the admission of exhibit B into evidence as it is hearsay. xAntho_ny's statements are out of court and therefore are hearsay. Anthony must testify and be subject to cross examination for their statements to be admissible in Court. Otherwise, the witness is effectively testifying without the ability to be confronted.

 

[Alexander P. Love]

Objection, Your Honor
I motion to block the admission of exhibit E into evidence as it is hearsay. FoniWeiss's statements are out of court and therefore are hearsay. Anthony must testify and be subject to cross examination for their statements to be admissible in Court. Otherwise, the witness is effectively testifying without the ability to be confronted.

Objection, Your Honor
I motion to block the admission of exhibit F into evidence as it is hearsay. Dartanman's statements are out of court and therefore are hearsay. Anthony must testify and be subject to cross examination for their statements to be admissible in Court. Otherwise, the witness is effectively testifying without the ability to be confronted. Furthermore, the evidence is also not relevant in any substantial way to the trial.

 

[Alexander P. Love]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

JediAJMan
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Justice
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. This case is frivolous. The case rests on the DOJ not responding for four hours. This is a very short timeframe and a reasonable person should not expect someone to be hovering over the ticket system 24/7. This argument serves only to harass the defendant. The emotional damages claim should be dismissed with prejudice as it sits upon this. No response in four hours when there is no expectation of a quicker response is not a valid claim to emotional damages. Therefore, this claim does not have a valid cause of action pursuant to the Motions Guide (link) and should be dismissed. People have lives, plain and simple.
2. The Plaintiff has failed to state a valid cause of action for loss of enjoyment. The mere act of sitting in a cell is not damaging as the plaintiff was imprisoned lawfully. According to BenTDM v. The Commonwealth of Redmont (link), the plaintiff must prove their innocence beyond a reasonable doubt which was not done. Exhibit C appears to contain a revenge killing, as JediAJMan struck FoniWeiss first. Therefore, JediAJMan committed murder and was lawfully imprisoned. Further, arguing your case in a ticket does not constitute loss of enjoyment in Redmont as the ticket system is the quickest and most practical way to resolve any issue. This does not create an undue burden on the plaintiff under the eyes of the law. The loss of enjoyment in Redmont claim therefore holds no valid cause of action and must be dismissed with prejudice.
3. If either of these reasons to dismiss are accepted, that would lower the value of the case, and therefore the legal fee amount as well. Further, the total value (regular value plus legal fees) would not meet the threshold to be filed in the Federal Court. If either reasons one or two are granted with prejudice, I motion that this case be dismissed from the Federal Court due to a lack of original jurisdiction. Of course, if both are accepted, the entire case is tossed and this item should be disregarded by the Court.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 15th day of October 2023

 

[ko531]

ANSWER TO OBJECTION
For Object 2, 3 and 4 Hearsay is only for Witness testimony about a statement made by another person. This evidence is not Witness Testimony and it is not being said by another person. These are statements made by the people themselves. There are too many cases to count that allow statements outside the courts as evidence, one example is:

Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66 Lawsuit: In Session - Galavance v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2023] FCR 66

​

We plan on calling Anthony to testify about these statements and there the defense will have the ability to cross-examine.

For Objection 1, I understand that in civil cases their is a lower bar for burden of proof. The judge did state in their verdict that "It is the opinion of the court that this indeed was disorderly behavior and could be deemed to a reasonable person as causing harassment." Note the word indeed, not probable or likely but Indeed. Meaning that the judge believe without a doubt that their was harassment. If the defense would like we can call that judge to the stand to verify the meaning of this statement

 

[ko531]

ANSWER TO MOTION TO DISMISS

1. Our case does not rest on the fact that Jedi had to wait 4 hours, it rest on the fact that with the evidence provided we believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the murder was self defense. Evidence D was only submitted to try and help paint a picture as to Jedi's state of mind at the time. The emotional damages are for the distress that the DOJ caused. For the anger that Jedi felt after being wrongfully convicted and the Sadness after days of arguing in multiple DOJ tickets being told that the crime would not be removed from their record. Jedi takes pride in their almost clean criminal record and by the DOJ not removing the wrongful conviction caused emotional damages as well.

2. There were 2 DOJ tickets opened about this issue which were multiple days of arguing their innocences. Jedi had to Endore this. They were convicted wrongfully of a crime and lost faith in the DOJ. No longer felt safe. This is how they lost their enjoyment of redmont, sorry for not making in clear in my original filing of this case. The defense also makes the point that Jedi killed first. This would assume facts not in evidence but for the sake of time we will agree with this. This murder was not reported by using /complaint so to talk about the intentions is pure speculation. The defense also mentioned the motive of "revenge killing" which is also speculation until witnesses can be called to the stand and talk about their motives. Even if the motive was revenge killing it would still be harassment as Foni murdered Jedi without consent multiple times clearly shown because Jedi filed a lawsuit against Foni.

3. If the first 2 motions to dismiss are denied then the problem that this case not having the requirements for the federal court would no longer be at issue

 

[ko531]

Your Honor, We will be dropping this case after coming to an out of court settlement with the DOJ and the Attorney General

 

[drew_hall]

This case has been dismissed at the request of the Plaintiff. The court thanks all involved parties for their time.