Lawsuit: Pending in re: S104/C475 [2025] FCR 124

[Muggy21]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Administrative Hearing : In Re: S104/C745 [2025] FCR 124

Initial Cases:

(Pepecuu) Pepe v. Matt [2025] FCR 100
(12700k) 12700k v. Matt [2025] FCR 89

Pending Cases:
(Pepecuu) Pepe v. CW [2025] FCR 116
(12700k) 12700k v. CW [2025] FCR 110


COUNSELORS: READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY

@Pepecuu @12700k @Dartanboy @Attorney

The Federal Court has issued equally binding rulings that conflict. The pending cases before this Court may lead to paradoxical relief and, in their current format, denies parties the right to convince this Court in an adversarial nature against the other creditor. As both parties have prayed to the Federal Court to enforce their own respective Orders (see Initial Cases above), the Court sees fit to hold an administrative hearing to rectify the Orders. Counselors, this is not an appeal; FCR 100 and FCR 89 will not be amended. This is a hearing to find equitable relief between the parties in light of this Court’s confliction.


INSTRUCTIONS:

Pepecuu and 12700k (or their counselors):

Upon advising the Court of your appearance, you shall have Five Days to pose a brief to the Court in the following general format.

1. WHY SHOULD YOUR SIDE PREVAIL
2. WHY SHOULD OPPOSING SIDE FAIL

There will be an opportunity to give a reply brief from the opposing party; The deadline for a response is Three Days after opposing party’s submission. The Commonwealth will also brief on the matter, this brief will not be answerable. Parties may object or motion to strike, but a general response will not be permitted.

Arguments raised by parties and the Commonwealth in their respective cases (see above Pending Cases) will be preserved.
Commonwealth:

Upon advising the Court of your appearance, you shall answer this question in your brief, along with other arguments you may raise.

1. ADVISED ACTION - What position should the Court take?

For posterity:

This hearing will allow parties to advocate for their client’s position in light of the confliction of the Court and the limitations of our laws. Furthermore, if a party wishes to appeal, this hearing gives the Supreme Court additional argument to use in rendering a final verdict. The Court will not entertain objections to the hearing, you may appeal to the Supreme Court upon the rendering of a final decision on this case.


AMICUS BRIEFS:

Any registered Attorney (or Barrister with Property and Administrative Law) may apply to the Court to be heard on amicus brief. You must provide a reason for your brief. You may not apply prior to all briefs being submitted to this Court. (Essentially, when Pepe and 12700k file their briefs, then you may apply.) Do not approach if you have a conflict with ANY party on the matter.



THE COURT’s ORDERS:

1. All injunctions from the below cases persist. S104 and C475 shall not be disturbed, evicted, transferred, nor subject to any other action.
2. [2025] FCR 116 and [2025] FCR 110 are administratively stayed.

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Kaiserin_ @12700k @Dartanboy @Pepecuu , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of in re: S104/C475 [2025] FCR 124

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Kaiserin_]

The Commonwealth is present, your honour. @Vennefly will be representing the Commonwealth in this hearing, unless otherwise assigned.

 

[Franciscus]

Your Honor,

May it please the Court: I respectfully request permission to file a amicus brief on behalf of the Office of the President of the Senate.

 

[Pepecuu]

Your Honor,

May it please the Court: I respectfully request permission to file a amicus brief on behalf of the Office of the President of the Senate.

From the Court Order Above:
"You may not apply prior to all briefs being submitted to this Court. (Essentially, when Pepe and 12700k file their briefs, then you may apply.)"

 

[Pepecuu]

Writ of Summons

@Kaiserin_ @12700k @Dartanboy @Pepecuu , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of in re: S104/C475 [2025] FCR 124

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

I am present, your honor.

 

[Dartanboy]

Writ of Summons

@Kaiserin_ @12700k @Dartanboy @Pepecuu , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of in re: S104/C475 [2025] FCR 124

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Present on behalf of 12700k, your honor.

 

[Muggy21]

All parties present!

Initial Brief as described in my Order is due on 11/24/25 @ 10pm.
If you want an extension, just ask!

 

[ToadKing]

Your Honour,

I respectfully notify the Court of my intention to request permission to submit a short explanatory brief regarding my role as Public Defender in Pepecuu v MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 100, specifically concerning the negotiation and structure of the settlement agreement adopted by the Court.

I wish to clarify that this request is not made as an application for amicus curiae status, nor as a party’s brief. Rather, I seek leave solely to provide limited context to assist the Court’s understanding of the circumstances surrounding the settlement and the reasoning behind the terms that were proposed.

 

[Muggy21]

Your Honour,

I respectfully notify the Court of my intention to request permission to submit a short explanatory brief regarding my role as Public Defender in Pepecuu v MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 100, specifically concerning the negotiation and structure of the settlement agreement adopted by the Court.

I wish to clarify that this request is not made as an application for amicus curiae status, nor as a party’s brief. Rather, I seek leave solely to provide limited context to assist the Court’s understanding of the circumstances surrounding the settlement and the reasoning behind the terms that were proposed.

Granted.

Please title your brief as to distinguish from a party brief.
Due Date: 11/24/25 @ 10pm.

 

[ToadKing]

Brief

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
EXPLANATORY BRIEF
RE: Settlement Negotiations in Pepecuu v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 100

I respectfully submit this explanatory brief, as authorised by the Court's Order, to provide context regarding my role in negotiating the settlement agreement adopted in [2025] FCR 100.

I. BACKGROUND​

I was appointed as Public Defender to represent the Defendant, MattTheSavvy, on 16 October 2025, in [2025] FCR 100. At the time of my appointment, the Defendant had been offline for nearly two months and was unable to provide instructions or participate in their own defence. Given this circumstance, I undertook my duties with the objective of securing the most equitable outcome possible under the circumstances, while protecting the Defendant's interests to the extent practicable.

​

II. THE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION PROCESS​

Upon reviewing the case, I recognised and assessed that:

1. The Defendant had violated the terms of the mortgage contract by transferring collateral (Plot C307) to a third party (the DCT) without the Plaintiff's consent, albeit through the DCT's plot eviction policy rather than voluntary action;
2. The Plaintiff's original Prayer for Relief sought $123,750.00 in compensatory damages, $61,875.00 in punitive damages, $55,687.50 in legal fees, and a Court Order mandating transfer of C305 and C307;
3. The Defendant's prolonged absence made meaningful defence or negotiation on their behalf extremely difficult;
4. The Defendant's available assets were insufficient to satisfy the full monetary demands.

In good faith, I approached the Plaintiff to negotiate a settlement that would:

• Provide meaningful compensation to the wronged party;
• Eliminate the disproportionate punitive damages request of $61,875.00, which I believed did not meet the threshold of "outrageous conduct" given the Defendant's mere absence rather than malicious behaviour;
• Adjust the compensatory and legal fee awards to reflect the Defendant's actual available funds ($50,365.65 and $15,109.70, respectively);
• Secure the transfer of C305 as originally requested.
• Propose liquidation of the Defendant's remaining properties (s104 and c745) through DCT eviction and auction proceedings, with proceeds directed to the Plaintiff.

​

III. CRITICAL OVERSIGHT​

I candidly acknowledge to this Court that I was not aware, at the time of proposing the settlement terms, that properties s104 and c745 were subject to an emergency injunction in the pending matter of 12700k v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 89.

This oversight was entirely unintentional. In my review of the case and in formulating a settlement proposal, I failed to conduct a comprehensive search for other pending litigation involving the Defendant's properties. Had I been aware of the existing injunction, I would never have included these properties in the settlement proposal.

​

IV. REASONING BEHIND THE PROPOSED LIQUIDATION​

My decision to propose liquidation of s104 and c745 (rather than direct transfer) was motivated by several factors:

1. The Plaintiff's original Prayer for Relief specifically requested transfer of only C305 and C307 - not s104 or c745. I did not believe it was appropriate to add these properties to the transfer order;
2. Given the Defendant's inability to pay the full remaining loan amount, I sought a mechanism to provide additional compensation to the Plaintiff while ensuring an orderly, supervised process through the DCT;
3. Liquidation through auction would potentially realise fair market value for the properties, with any surplus (however unlikely) theoretically available to the Defendant, whereas direct transfer would provide no such possibility;
4. With the Defendant absent and unable to satisfy the judgment, auction proceedings offered a practical path to partial satisfaction of the debt.

I emphasize that this proposal was made in good faith and with the intention of serving both parties' interests under difficult circumstances.

​

V. IMPACT ON CURRENT PROCEEDINGS​

I understand that the Court now faces a conflict between its Orders in [2025] FCR 100 and [2025] FCR 89, and that this administrative hearing has been convened to provide equitable relief. I submit this brief not to advocate for any particular outcome, but to ensure the Court has complete context regarding how the settlement terms came to include the disputed properties.

The inclusion of s104 and c745 in the settlement was the result of my oversight as counsel, not any intention by either party to circumvent existing injunctions or interfere with the rights of other creditors. Both the Plaintiff and I negotiated in good faith.

​

VI. CONCLUSION​

I respectfully submit this explanation to assist the Court in understanding the circumstances that led to the current conflict. I take full responsibility for the oversight regarding the injunction on properties s104 and c745, and I hope this context aids the Court in fashioning an equitable resolution that honours the rights of all parties involved.

I remain available should the Court have any other questions.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, may I have an extension until Monday evening (Central Time) due to IRL circumstances?

(I'm not sure how many hours that is due to timezones - it might not even be an extension at all)

 

[Muggy21]

Your honor, may I have an extension until Monday evening (Central Time) due to IRL circumstances?

(I'm not sure how many hours that is due to timezones - it might not even be an extension at all)

The deadline is Monday at 10pm lol

I'll extend deadline to all parties to Tuesday at 5pm EST. (11/25/25 @ 5pm EST)