Lawsuit: Pending IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12

Rookieblue14

Rookieblue14

Citizen
Congressional Staff
Supporter
Aventura Resident
Homeland Security Department
Interior Department
Justice Department
Construction & Transport Department
Health Department
Change Maker Popular in the Polls Statesman Order of Redmont
Rookieblue14
Rookieblue14
Clerk
Joined
Jun 14, 2025
Messages
3,217

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


IgnitedTnT
Plaintiff

v.

RiggoSoft
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On February 28th, 2026 a final verdict was issued in IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 in which LeafLuxury LLC was ordered to pay a total of $132,400. RiggoSoft, the sole member and manager of LeafLuxury LLC reports the company only has $500 in assets and is unable to pay the full amount. Under the terms of LeafLuxury LLC's formation document, all losses are distributed to its members, that solely being RiggoSoft.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. IgnitedTnT (Plaintiff)
2. RiggoSoft (Co-Defendant)
3. LeafLuxury LLC (Co-Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On February 18th, 2026 the Honorable Judge ko531 issued a verdict in IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 finding that LeafLuxury LLC violated the duty to deal in good faith by failing to disclose their risk of being unable to uphold their contractual obligations (P-003).
2. In this verdict, the Honorable Judge ko531 ordered LeafLuxury LLC to pay IgnitedTNT $100,000 in punitive damages and $6,000 in consequential damages, as well as $31,800 to MZLD in legal fees.
3. On February 18th, 2026 a ticket was opened with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to facilitate the payment of this obligation.
4. On February 24th, 2026 RiggoSoft was added to the ticket to facilitate payment of this obligation and asked if the debt was able to be paid.
5. On February 25th, 2026 RiggoSoft stated that LeafLuxury LLC has only $500 in assets (P-004).
6. On February 26th, 2026 RiggoSoft paid $350 at the direction of the DHS to IgnitedTnT, reducing the debt owed to $105,650.
7. On February 27th, 2026 RiggoSoft paid $150 at the direction of DHS to Rookieblue14, a representative of MZLD, reducing the debt owed to $31,650.
8. LeafLuxury LLC is a member-managed LLC incorporated Limited Liability Company under the Legal Entity Act (P-001).
9. RiggoSoft is the sole member of LeafLuxury LLC (P-001).
10. The formation document for LeafLuxury LLC on file with the Department of Commerce states, "All profits and losses are distributed in proportion to the amount of equity a member holds in the company." (P-002)
11. The formation document for LeafLuxury LLC on file with the Department of Commerce states, "There are 100 votes to represent the entire equity of the company". (P-002)
11. Part III - 10 of the Legal Entity Act states, "(4) Any person may voluntarily assume liability for any or all debts and obligations of the Incorporated Entity."

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. RiggoSoft is personally liable for the losses of LeafLuxury LLC
Per the formation document of LeafLuxury LLC (P-002), losses are distributed in proportion of the amount of equity a member holds in the company. RiggoSoft, being the sole member of the company, holds 100% equity in the company, meaning he is responsible for 100% of the loses suffered from this court case. RiggoSoft voluntarily assumed liability for all debts and obligations of LeafLuxury LLC by becoming a member LeafLuxury LLC, in compliance with its formation document.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Compensatory Damages in the amount of $105,650 to be awarded to IgnitedTNT as ordered in the judgement of IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131.
2. Compensatory Damages in the amount of $31,650 in legal fees owed to MZLD.
3. 30% of the case value in legal fees, to be awarded to MZLD.

V. EVIDENCE
See P-001
See P-002
BlueRiverOtter

Lawsuit: Adjourned Thread 'IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131'

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


IgnitedTnT (represented by Talion & Partners)
Plaintiff

v.

LeafLuxury LLC
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Defendant entered into an acquisition contract whilst knowingly lacking the money assuming that a securities exchange would list corporate bonds of the defendant and that players would invest in said bonds. This led to the Defendant being unable to fulfill their contractual obligations and the acquisition being reversed...
Click to expand...

DB Info.png
See P-005


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 28th day of February, 2026



Consent.png
 

Attachments

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT

The plaintiff moves for summary judgement in this case, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. The vast majority of the facts of this case were decided in IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131.
2. The formation document for LeafLuxury LLC demonstrates a clear intent for its members to take on the losses of the LLC. As the sole member with 100% equity in the company, RiggoSoft is therefore liable.

As there are no new facts in this case, we belief Summary Judgement is applicable in this case.

 

Writ of Summons


@RiggoSoft is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.



The Court complied with the new LEA in summoning the company
 

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

RiggoSoft, being the sole member of the company, holds 100% equity in the company, meaning he is responsible for 100% of the loses suffered from this court case.
Click to expand...

RiggoSoft does not own any part of LeafLuxury LLC and has never owned any equity in LeafLuxury LLC, the plaintiff's counsel knew this as they themselves had linked LeafLuxury LLC's formation document which said

All equity is owned and possessed by Leaf Capital Incorporated (See PER-01)
Click to expand...

We respectfully ask the court to find the plaintiff's counsel guilty of perjury as they have intentionally misrepresented facts to attempt to receive damages from the defendant. We also ask that this statement is to be struck from the record.

1772593914180.png



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS - Failure To Name Necessary Parties

The defendant listed is not an owner of LeafLuxury LLC and has never owned a part of LeafLuxury LLC. We humbly ask that this case is dismissed.

1772593914180.png

 

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The defendant claims that P-002 is the formation document of LeafLuxury LLC however this is not true, they have intentionally attached an old copy of the formation document in attempts to hide the fact that LeafLuxury LLC has a clause regarding Profit and Loss Distribution which protects equity holders. Attached is the up to date agreement and the post of the new agreement being posted in the docket prior to this case being pursued.

As such we ask that the plaintiff's counsel is found guilty of perjury and the exhibit P-002 is suppressed and struck from the record.

Attached
Screenshot of P-002
1772595763816.png
1772595806554.png

Screenshot of actual agreement document that is up to date which protection for equity holders
Post where updated agreement was sent



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The plaintiff has claimed in their written statement that

Under the terms of LeafLuxury LLC's formation document, all losses are distributed to its members, that solely being RiggoSoft.
Click to expand...

The defendant has intentionally misrepresented facts saying that all losses are distributed to its members. This is not true as the updated formation document that was made before this case was filed included a provision protecting equity holders from losses and commitment to liabilities of the company. Subsequently we ask that the court finds the plaintiff's counsel guilty of perjury and strikes the statement from the record.

1772595806554.png

 

Attachments

RiggoSoft said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The defendant claims that P-002 is the formation document of LeafLuxury LLC however this is not true, they have intentionally attached an old copy of the formation document in attempts to hide the fact that LeafLuxury LLC has a clause regarding Profit and Loss Distribution which protects equity holders. Attached is the up to date agreement and the post of the new agreement being posted in the docket prior to this case being pursued.

As such we ask that the plaintiff's counsel is found guilty of perjury and the exhibit P-002 is suppressed and struck from the record.

Attached
Screenshot of P-002
View attachment 76189
View attachment 76190
Screenshot of actual agreement document that is up to date which protection for equity holders
Post where updated agreement was sent



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The plaintiff has claimed in their written statement that


The defendant has intentionally misrepresented facts saying that all losses are distributed to its members. This is not true as the updated formation document that was made before this case was filed included a provision protecting equity holders from losses and commitment to liabilities of the company. Subsequently we ask that the court finds the plaintiff's counsel guilty of perjury and strikes the statement from the record.

View attachment 76190

Click to expand...
Sorry we rescind these didn't see that this case was sent at 2:14 AM on Saturday the defendant apologizes to the court.
 
Muggy21 said:

Writ of Summons


@RiggoSoft is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of IgnitedTnT v. RiggoSoft and LeafLuxury LLC [2026] FCR 12

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.



The Court complied with the new LEA in summoning the company
Click to expand...
Present your honor
 
RiggoSoft said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY



RiggoSoft does not own any part of LeafLuxury LLC and has never owned any equity in LeafLuxury LLC, the plaintiff's counsel knew this as they themselves had linked LeafLuxury LLC's formation document which said



We respectfully ask the court to find the plaintiff's counsel guilty of perjury as they have intentionally misrepresented facts to attempt to receive damages from the defendant. We also ask that this statement is to be struck from the record.

View attachment 76173



Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS - Failure To Name Necessary Parties

The defendant listed is not an owner of LeafLuxury LLC and has never owned a part of LeafLuxury LLC. We humbly ask that this case is dismissed.

View attachment 76173

Click to expand...

Response


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION - PERJURY
Your Honor, as shown in P-001, LeafLuxury LLC currently has a single member, that being RiggoSoft. According to the Legal Entity Act on Membership in LLCs:
(1) All LLCs shall have a member register.

(2) The membership shall not go into effect until the member register is updated.

(3) The member register shall be put into the Incorporated Entity Summary and shall keep a record of all members.

(a) The member register shall have the rebuttable presumption of membership.

Leaf Capital Incorporated is not a member of the LLC, RiggoSoft himself is. Additionally, at no point did I refer to RiggoSoft as the owner of LeafLuxury LLC, I stated he was the sole member, and according to the formation documents of LeafLuxury LLC, therefore liable.

 
Your honor prior to any rulings on any motions or objections please allow the defendant to object to the plaintiffs response
 
RiggoSoft said:

Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The defendant claims that P-002 is the formation document of LeafLuxury LLC however this is not true, they have intentionally attached an old copy of the formation document in attempts to hide the fact that LeafLuxury LLC has a clause regarding Profit and Loss Distribution which protects equity holders. Attached is the up to date agreement and the post of the new agreement being posted in the docket prior to this case being pursued.

As such we ask that the plaintiff's counsel is found guilty of perjury and the exhibit P-002 is suppressed and struck from the record.

Attached
Screenshot of P-002
View attachment 76189
View attachment 76190
Screenshot of actual agreement document that is up to date which protection for equity holders
Post where updated agreement was sent



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

The plaintiff has claimed in their written statement that


The defendant has intentionally misrepresented facts saying that all losses are distributed to its members. This is not true as the updated formation document that was made before this case was filed included a provision protecting equity holders from losses and commitment to liabilities of the company. Subsequently we ask that the court finds the plaintiff's counsel guilty of perjury and strikes the statement from the record.

View attachment 76190

Click to expand...

Response


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION - PERJURY

While I note the defense has stated he wishes to rescind these objections, I would still like to speak on them. As noted by the defendant, he is currently attempting to amend the formation documents for LeafLuxury LLC to change the provisions that specifically apply in this case. As noted by the defendant, this case was filed against himself and LeafLuxury LLC prior to the amendment being posted to the company document.

According to The Legal Entity Act on amendments to the Formation Documents of LLCs:

(1) An amendment shall not affect any existing cause of action in favor of or against the LLC, nor any pending legal action to which it is a party.

I therefore ask the Court rule against these objections and find this suit to be considered under the formation document at the time of the suit being filed as defined by law.



Objection


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - PERJURY

As noted in the above response, the defendant claims that I have intentionally misrepresented facts by referring to an outdated formation document. As laid out above, this formation document was in fact the one in form at the time the lawsuit was filed until the defendant chose to amend it six hours after the filing of this case. While the timing is suspect, I'm inclined to give the defendant the benefit of the doubt here. I ask that the above objections be stricken on the grounds of perjury, but unlike the Defendant I do NOT ask for any further sanctions against him.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top