Lawsuit: Pending IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

[BlueRiverOtter]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


IgnitedTnT (represented by Talion & Partners)
Plaintiff

v.

LeafLuxury LLC
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

The Defendant entered into an acquisition contract whilst knowingly lacking the money assuming that a securities exchange would list corporate bonds of the defendant and that players would invest in said bonds. This led to the Defendant being unable to fulfill their contractual obligations and the acquisition being reversed.

I. PARTIES
1. IgnitedTnT - Plaintiff
2. LeafLuxury LLC - Defendant

II. FACTS
(comment: dates are in the MM/DD/YY format; ‘Torchlight’ shall refer to Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC)
1. On 11/23/25 at 11:57 AM (GMT+1) plaintiff made an offer to sell Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC (P-001)
2. The defendant proceeded to make multiple inquiries to the plaintiff on the assets, conditions, and debts of Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC. To which my client truthfully answered to the best of his ability. (p-001)
3. On 11/25/25 at 5 PM (GMT+1) defendant offered a contract to buy Torchlight for 175 thousand dollars.(P-001, P-002)
4. The plaintiff then proceeded to sign the contract at 5:52 PM (GMT +1) (p-001)
5. On 11/25/25 at 11:42 PM (GMT+1) the defendant then signed the contract constituting acceptance and mutual agreement. (P-001)
6. At 11:52 PM (GMT+1) plaintiff began transferring assets and equity over to LeafLuxury LLC as well as disclosing what contracts LeafLuxury LLC is under and general information regarding the status of the LLC. (P-001)
7. On 11/26/25 at 10:49 (GMT +1) plaintiff said he would be awaiting payment, defendant responded by saying that not the in-game account had not been transferred yet and thus the defendant did not meet the required performance before compensation (P-001)
8. All assets are transferred to the defendant on 11/26/25 at 4:13 PM (GMT+1) (P-001)
9. The contract for the selling of the LLC gives the buyer 48 hours upon the performance of the seller to deliver appropriate funds, after that deadline elapses the buyer is given an additional 48 hours to deliver the funds late during which late fees accumulate 500 dollars per every hour that compensation is late capped at 1000. (P-001)
10. On 11/27/25 at 5:34 PM (GMT+1) the defendant alleges that "financing" is slow and that payment will be received either tomorrow or late. Defendant states that if it is late that the plaintiff may reverse the sale as outlined in the contract. (P-001)
11. On 11/27/25 at 6:56 PM Plaintiff states that he would be willing to waive the late fee if the defendant needs more time, however he would like an indication of when it would be and the Defendant’s progress on securing funds. Defendant alleges he does not know the answers to neither the former nor the latter. (P-001)
12. On 11/30/25 at 4:30 PM (GMT + 1) Defendant notifies Plaintiff that he has the opportunity to reverse the sale by nullifying the contract (P-001)
13. On 11/30/25 the defendant alleges that “they just got financing through” and says provided the Plaintiff is willing the defendant can “go ahead with the deal” and including the respective late penalty. (P-001)
14. On 12/01/25 at Defendant alleges the financing payment is still being delivered. (P-001)
15. On 12/0125 Plaintiff asks the status of financing, defendant responds that he hadn't got word with the financier in a while. (P-001)
16. On 12/01/25 at 9:45 PM once prompted by the Plaintiff, the defendant said that the financier was the National Exchange of Redmont and that the defendant was attempting to list corporate bonds. (P-001)
17. On 12/02/25 at 12:19 Plaintiff asks on any updates, Defendant responds no and that the Plaintiff should reverse the sale if they don't get an answer by December 5th (P-001)
18. 25 Minutes later Plaintiff responds by inquiring if the Defendant could provide screenshots of the Defendants last conversation with them. Defendant denys. (P-001)
19. The Plaintiff nullifies the contract out of lack of confidence in the Defendant (P-001)
20. The Defendant almost immediately after shares the screenshot the Defendant asked for in fact 18. (P-001, P-003)
21. The Defendant fully transfers all assets bought. (P-001)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing​

Before the Plaintiff will argue whether the Defendant breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing the Plaintiff will assert that it is well beyond the balance of probabilities that the Defendant knowingly entered a transactional contract without having the requisite funds to pay. On 11/25/25 the Defendant signed the acquisition contract as previously established in fact 5, only a little under 42 hours not even 2 days later the Defendant announced that the Defendant did not have the money to pay as he was awaiting the listing of corporate bonds.

At the end of the day the Defendant entered into a contract that he knew he didn't yet have the money for, assuming that people would make an investment, leading to payment being 4 days late during which the Defendant repeatedly alleged corporate bond money was arriving and in the end my client choosing to nullify the acquisition out of lack of confidence.

This is a clear cut and dry case of breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing. I will once again reiterate this for the sake of clarity: not only did the Defendant fail to fulfill his contractual obligations but he entered a contract under the assumption that ordinary people would buy his investment in an act of incredibly outrageous conduct.

2. Time & Labor in Executing the Contract​

My client spent much of his time and labor to transfer equity, to brief the Defendant on the assets the company held, to transfer the firm itself, and to transfer the assets of the LLC in order to perform a contract that he was ultimately never given consideration for due to the shortcomings of the Defendant and should be justly compensated accordingly.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $190,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant entering into a contract whilst knowingly being unable to perform it on the assumption that people would buy his bonds, as well as the failure to perform in the end.
7. $6,000 in consequential damages for the Plaintiff's time and labor in executing his end of the contract
6. 30% of damages awarded as legal fees to Talion & Partners (pay to ATP)

Evidence:

Spoiler: P-001

Chat log: attached

Spoiler: P-002

Acquisition contract

Spoiler: P-003

Screenshot of the conversation with NER pursuant to fact 20:

Witnesses:
None

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of December, 2025 (UTC-5)

 

[Muggy21]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


IgnitedTnT (represented by Talion & Partners)
Plaintiff

v.

LeafLuxury LLC
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES
1. IgnitedTnT - Plaintiff
2. LeafLuxury LLC - Defendant

II. FACTS
(comment: dates are in the MM/DD/YY format; ‘Torchlight’ shall refer to Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC)
1. On 11/23/25 at 11:57 AM (GMT+1) plaintiff made an offer to sell Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC (P-001)
2. The defendant proceeded to make multiple inquiries to the plaintiff on the assets, conditions, and debts of Torchlight Luxury Properties LLC. To which my client truthfully answered to the best of his ability. (p-001)
3. On 11/25/25 at 5 PM (GMT+1) defendant offered a contract to buy Torchlight for 175 thousand dollars.(P-001, P-002)
4. The plaintiff then proceeded to sign the contract at 5:52 PM (GMT +1) (p-001)
5. On 11/25/25 at 11:42 PM (GMT+1) the defendant then signed the contract constituting acceptance and mutual agreement. (P-001)
6. At 11:52 PM (GMT+1) plaintiff began transferring assets and equity over to LeafLuxury LLC as well as disclosing what contracts LeafLuxury LLC is under and general information regarding the status of the LLC. (P-001)
7. On 11/26/25 at 10:49 (GMT +1) plaintiff said he would be awaiting payment, defendant responded by saying that not the in-game account had not been transferred yet and thus the defendant did not meet the required performance before compensation (P-001)
8. All assets are transferred to the defendant on 11/26/25 at 4:13 PM (GMT+1) (P-001)
9. The contract for the selling of the LLC gives the buyer 48 hours upon the performance of the seller to deliver appropriate funds, after that deadline elapses the buyer is given an additional 48 hours to deliver the funds late during which late fees accumulate 500 dollars per every hour that compensation is late capped at 1000. (P-001)
10. On 11/27/25 at 5:34 PM (GMT+1) the defendant alleges that "financing" is slow and that payment will be received either tomorrow or late. Defendant states that if it is late that the plaintiff may reverse the sale as outlined in the contract. (P-001)
11. On 11/27/25 at 6:56 PM Plaintiff states that he would be willing to waive the late fee if the defendant needs more time, however he would like an indication of when it would be and the Defendant’s progress on securing funds. Defendant alleges he does not know the answers to neither the former nor the latter. (P-001)
12. On 11/30/25 at 4:30 PM (GMT + 1) Defendant notifies Plaintiff that he has the opportunity to reverse the sale by nullifying the contract (P-001)
13. On 11/30/25 the defendant alleges that “they just got financing through” and says provided the Plaintiff is willing the defendant can “go ahead with the deal” and including the respective late penalty. (P-001)
14. On 12/01/25 at Defendant alleges the financing payment is still being delivered. (P-001)
15. On 12/0125 Plaintiff asks the status of financing, defendant responds that he hadn't got word with the financier in a while. (P-001)
16. On 12/01/25 at 9:45 PM once prompted by the Plaintiff, the defendant said that the financier was the National Exchange of Redmont and that the defendant was attempting to list corporate bonds. (P-001)
17. On 12/02/25 at 12:19 Plaintiff asks on any updates, Defendant responds no and that the Plaintiff should reverse the sale if they don't get an answer by December 5th (P-001)
18. 25 Minutes later Plaintiff responds by inquiring if the Defendant could provide screenshots of the Defendants last conversation with them. Defendant denys. (P-001)
19. The Plaintiff nullifies the contract out of lack of confidence in the Defendant (P-001)
20. The Defendant almost immediately after shares the screenshot the Defendant asked for in fact 18. (P-001, P-003)
21. The Defendant fully transfers all assets bought. (P-001)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing​

Before the Plaintiff will argue whether the Defendant breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing the Plaintiff will assert that it is well beyond the balance of probabilities that the Defendant knowingly entered a transactional contract without having the requisite funds to pay. On 11/25/25 the Defendant signed the acquisition contract as previously established in fact 5, only a little under 42 hours not even 2 days later the Defendant announced that the Defendant did not have the money to pay as he was awaiting the listing of corporate bonds.

At the end of the day the Defendant entered into a contract that he knew he didn't yet have the money for, assuming that people would make an investment, leading to payment being 4 days late during which the Defendant repeatedly alleged corporate bond money was arriving and in the end my client choosing to nullify the acquisition out of lack of confidence.

This is a clear cut and dry case of breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing. I will once again reiterate this for the sake of clarity: not only did the Defendant fail to fulfill his contractual obligations but he entered a contract under the assumption that ordinary people would buy his investment in an act of incredibly outrageous conduct.

2. Time & Labor in Executing the Contract​

My client spent much of his time and labor to transfer equity, to brief the Defendant on the assets the company held, to transfer the firm itself, and to transfer the assets of the LLC in order to perform a contract that he was ultimately never given consideration for due to the shortcomings of the Defendant and should be justly compensated accordingly.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $190,000 in Punitive Damages for the defendant entering into a contract whilst knowingly being unable to perform it on the assumption that people would buy his bonds, as well as the failure to perform in the end.
7. $6,000 in consequential damages for the Plaintiff's time and labor in executing his end of the contract
6. 30% of damages awarded as legal fees to Talion & Partners (pay to ATP)

Evidence:

Spoiler: P-001

Download html file and open (if anyone is unable to open the HTML file Plaintiff's counsel would be happy to provide screenshots instead upon request)

Spoiler: P-002

Acquisition contract

Spoiler: P-003

Screenshot of the conversation with NER pursuant to fact 20: View attachment 68745

Witnesses:
None

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of December, 2025 (UTC-5)

P-001 needs to be a pdf.

 

[BlueRiverOtter]

P-001 needs to be a pdf.

Thank you your honor, amended.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@RiggoSoft , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of IgnitedTNT v. Leafluxury LLC [2025] FCR 131


In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[RiggoSoft]

Writ of Summons

@RiggoSoft , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of IgnitedTNT v. Leafluxury LLC [2025] FCR 131


In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Furthermore, in obedience with Rule 1.4, parties are advised that engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes with the administration of this Court or its proceedings may be held in Contempt of Court.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[BlueRiverOtter]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure

Your honor Plantiff's counsel is not accusing Mr. Riggo of bad faith as it could have been a honest mistake however in the interest of making it clear that the Defendant has announced his presence, 7 minutes after Mr Riggo announced his presence by replying to the writ of summons and saying "I'm here" the message was edited to remove said phrase "i'm here".