Lawsuit: Pending Gavy v. Rafa_LIT4 [2026] DCR 157

[TheREALWINner]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION



Gavy
Plaintiff



v.



Rafa_LIT4
Defendant



COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:



WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On or about 10:00 EST on the 29th of July, 2026, a player by the name of Rafa_LIT4 created an illegal ad target at a local Willow farmer by the name of Gavy. This ad, which stated that Rafa_LIT4 would “KILL” Gavy, claimed that Gavy had both murdered Rafa’s employee and had refused to pay “12 before killing my employee.” This was broadcast to the entire server, and since it was placed in an ad, Rafa’s actions have both slandered this plaintiff's reputation and caused a nuisance for the Plaintiff in the enjoyment of his intellectual property rights as a citizen of Redmont.

I. PARTIES

1. Gavy

2. Rafa_LIT4


II. FACTS

1. On or about 10:00 PM EST on the July 29th, 2026, Rafa_LIT4 uploaded an ad stating the following. “Attention GAVY! i will KILL YOU for not paying me 12 bucks before killing MY employee,” as seen in P-001.

2. On or about 10:00 PM EST on the July 29th, 2026, Rafa_LIT4 sent a message to Gavy stating that “gavy, i have a head that SAYS killed by gavy, pay me 12 bucks which is the price for killing my employees and i will let u go. ALTHOUGH! we currently have a offer, 50 percent off for killing a core industries employee!” This can be seen in P-002.



III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. DEFAMATION (RCCA Part V §1)

Defamation is committed when a person “(a) makes a false statement and/or communication that injures a third party’s reputation; (b) the statement is made to at least one person other than the plaintiff; and (c) the statement is presented as fact rather than opinion.” The statement of Rafa_LIT4 meets these conditions in the following ways. The statement meets the requirements (a) as the communication of “Attention GAVY! i will KILL YOU for not paying me 12 bucks before killing MY employee” falsely implies that Gavy both unjustly killed an employee of Rafa_LIT4 and additionally falsely implies that Gavy knew about and refused to pay a fee of $12 before this point. This second point in particular is even more certain This communication has wrongly called into question the integrity of Gavy and his integrity in his business transactions.

2. SLANDER (RCCA Part V §3)

Slander is committed when a person both meet the conditions for Defamation and additionally “(b) the defamatory statement is made verbally, through Discord messages, or in-game messages; and (c) the statement defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization.” This has been committed as (1) the charge of Defamation has occurred, (2), the statement was made via public in-game messages, and (3), the statement defames the reputation of the Plaintiff.

3. NUISANCE (RCCA Part VII §6)
A person commits a nuisance violation when they both, (a) cause a substantial and unreasonable interference with another’s use and enjoyment of their property; and (b) the interference would be offensive to a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s position. It is the position of the Plaintiff that the Defendant has met this standard due to the following. As is implied by the Intellectual Property Act, intellectual property is a subcategory of property. That being the case, the plaintiff proports that whereas running a sole proprietorship is inherently tied to one’s name, and whereas it has been less than six months since the plaintiff has opened his business, the name of the Defendant qualifies for Trademark status under the Intellectual Property Act as it is a recognizable expression used to identify both the business and services that the Plaintiff offers. It may additionally be seen in P-003 that a cease-and-desist letter has been sent for this violation and there has been no response to the requests of the Plaintiff. Therefore, whereas the defendant has publicly defamed the name of the Plaintiff, he has substantially and unreasonably interfered with the use and enjoyment of the Plaintiff’s intellectual property by broadcasting defamation about his name to the entire server and has accordingly hampered the Plaintiff’s ability to reputably use his name as an expression to identify his business. It is also reasonable to infer that this interference would be offensive to a reasonable person in the plaintiff’s position, for the statement both defames and falsely accuses the Plaintiff of actions both unproven and outside of any respective context.



IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. A court order for a public retraction of the Defamatory/Slanderous statement.

2. A court order for the Defendant to abate the aforementioned Nuisance by requiring him to refrain from broadcasting further defamatory/slanderous statements on the server, but in particular about Gavy, his intellectual property, and any of his associates or businesses.

3. $3,000 in Civil Penalty units for the charge of Nuisance.

4. $3,000 in legal fees as outlined by the minimal legal fee requirements in Part III §7 of the RCCA.

Spoiler: P-001: Ad by Rafa_LIT4

“Attention GAVY! i will KILL YOU for not paying me 12 bucks before killing MY employee”

Spoiler: P-002: Msg from Rafa_LIT4

gavy, i have a head that SAYS killed by gavy, pay me 12 bucks which is the price for killing my employees and i will let u go. ALTHOUGH! we currently have a offer, 50 percent off for killing a core industries employee!

Spoiler: P-003: Cease and Desist Letter

To: Rafa_LIT4
From: The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates

Good evening. My name is Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508. I am sending this letter on behalf of my client, Gavy. Gavy has approached us with the intent to file charges against you for the following infractions committed on July 29, 2026 in the Minecraft server, Democracy Craft:

1. One (1) count of Defamation.
2. One (1) count of Slander.
3. One (1) count of Nuisance.

Gavy has presented adequate evidence to file said charges including but not limited to:

1. Screenshots proving both Slander and Defamation.
2. Additional screenshots proving Nuisance.

These charges are indictable crimes according to the Criminal Code Act of Redmont and, should the courts punish you to the fullest extent of our requests, it would result in the following fines and orders:

1. A court order for a public retraction of the Defamatory/Slanderous statement.

2. A court order for the Defendant to abate the aforementioned Nuisance by requiring him to refrain from broadcasting further defamatory/slanderous statements on the server, but in particular about Gavy, his intellectual property, and any of his associates or businesses.

3. $3,000 in Civil Penalty units for the charge of Nuisance.

4. $3,000 in legal fees as outlined by the minimal legal fee requirements in Part III §7 of the RCCA.

In short, this letter is a notice for the following:

1. This is a Cease-and-Desist notice for the player Rafa_LIT4 to cease and desist his use of Gavy's name in further public communication pertaining to any breach of contract transaction between Gavy and Rafa_LIT4. The use of Gavy's name in this way violates the RCCA on the basis of Trademark law. Gavy's name is a recognizable expression used to identify both his business and services that he offers and Rafa_LIT4's use of Gavy's name in Rafa's /ad was not for purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting, and/or teaching, but rather defamation and/or slander.
An affirmation here that such action will not be done again will be enough to meet the requirements of this Cease and Desist, provided that this infringement is not committed again.

2. Beyond this, the plaintiff requests that a public apology be made on the server for your false accusations raised against Gavy on the 29th of July, 2026. The plaintiff requests that a message be made to global chat stating the following: (1) Gavy had not refused to pay you $12, as you had not informed him of any charge before making an ad in chat, and (2) that Gavy had not murdered your employee wrongfully as he was acting in self-defense. After making such apology on global chat, please upload a screenshot here.

Upon delivery of this official notice, you will have 24 hours to respond. You may meet the requirements of your cease-and-desist letter by following the demands of the first point. Any charges related to Trademark Infringement will be dropped upon the fulfillment of the first point. All charges shall be dropped should both points be met. The charges of Defamation and/or Slander would be re-raised should an apology be made but further Defamation and/or Slander persits nonetheless. Additionally, should a promise to cease and desist be made here but is not kept, the charges pertaining to your infringement of trademark shall be re-raised. Should we not receive a response for all or part of this notice/cease-and-desist letter within this time frame, we will assume you have rejected this offer, whether in whole or in part, and will proceed to file the respective charges against you according to the terms outlined above.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Regards,
- Jacob Wolfe, aka SniperElite508
- The Law Offices of SingeHeart, Addams & Associates

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This 1st day of August 2026

 

[TheREALWINner]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

Amendment to Complaint​

The plaintiff respectfully moves to add the following brief amendment:

1. Evidence of Retention

Spoiler: P-004: Evidence of Retention

I, Gavy, am willing to have @SniperElite508 represent me in all matters pertaining to this case.

 

[Poker]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1) Defamation
I can't see how the statement injured the Plaintiff's reputation, or how it actually caused any harm to it. Either develop further on the alleged harm to the Plaintiff's reputation or provide evidence supporting it.

In Boykisse v. Musclebound [2026] DCR 19 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 11, the Federal Court stated: "Without proof of pecuniary damages, or any theory of damage that doesn’t rely on hypothesis, borne from the allegedly defamatory statements, Appellant’s remaining arguments are academic and not considered."

Accordingly, the Plaintiff need to establish what actual harm was caused to his reputation by the alleged defamatory statement.

2) Trademark
I haven't found any DB named Gavy, nor any incorporated entity in docket with this name. Please, provide proof that this company or trademark exists.

Please, address those questions within 48 hours

@TheREALWINner

 

[TheREALWINner]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1) Defamation
I can't see how the statement injured the Plaintiff's reputation, or how it actually caused any harm to it. Either develop further on the alleged harm to the Plaintiff's reputation or provide evidence supporting it.

In Boykisse v. Musclebound [2026] DCR 19 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 11, the Federal Court stated: "Without proof of pecuniary damages, or any theory of damage that doesn’t rely on hypothesis, borne from the allegedly defamatory statements, Appellant’s remaining arguments are academic and not considered."

Accordingly, the Plaintiff need to establish what actual harm was caused to his reputation by the alleged defamatory statement.

2) Trademark
I haven't found any DB named Gavy, nor any incorporated entity in docket with this name. Please, provide proof that this company or trademark exists.

Please, address those questions within 48 hours

@TheREALWINner

Your Honor,

This order has been recognized by the Plaintiff.

Due to IRL college commitments, the Plaintiff is having to manage this case and his schoolwork and may not be able to get a well written statement before the deadline.

Therefore, the Plaintiff respectfully requests a 72-hour extension so that these issues may be answered with the dignity this court deserves.

Respectfully Submitted,
SniperElite508

 

[Poker]

Granted

 

[TheREALWINner]

Granted

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff is about ready to present cause but needs a bit more time as we finalize the details about the witness testimony that will be introduced for this case in response to the court order.

The Plaintiff council has also had to prepare for several tests this week and will be unable to correlate the further evidence until later this weekend.

Therefore, we respectfully request that one last 72-hour extension be granted for this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,
SniperElite508

 

[Poker]

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff is about ready to present cause but needs a bit more time as we finalize the details about the witness testimony that will be introduced for this case in response to the court order.

The Plaintiff council has also had to prepare for several tests this week and will be unable to correlate the further evidence until later this weekend.

Therefore, we respectfully request that one last 72-hour extension be granted for this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,
SniperElite508

Ok

 

[TheREALWINner]

Your Honor,

As requested, here are some further developments on the issue. While the Plaintiff may develop the claim further during discovery, we wanted to report some of the progress related to this case. Provided that the information below satisfies the court's requirements, the Plaintiff will amend the complaint as necessary.

#1 - Defamation
According to the testimony of the Plaintiff, who will be a witness in this case along with fellow player and co-founder PeekDaWindows, the Defamatory statements have caused the Plaintiff harm in the following manner:

Whereas the nature of such a statement made in the form of a /ad is broadcasted to the entire server, the Plaintiff felt the need to seek legal counsel and had to, for a period of three days, cease business operations in discussion about his rights in this case. Since the Plaintiff at the time was a new player to the server, the statement caused the Plaintiff losses as he had to hire legal counsel in the amount of $1,500 to see what could be done about the matter. (See P-004)

Additionally, as will be seen in the attached transactional evidence, (P-005) the plaintiff's business, (BackywoodBoyzCo.), now makes around $12,500k in net profit a month on average. Witness KorroMF, who developed the bot pictured in the screenshot, will be testifying to the nature of the statistics bot, to establish it as a reliable source of information that cannot be edited from an external source. Additional screenshots can be submitted though from in-game sources should the court require it.

Since the nature of having to hire and confer with legal counsel required the Plaintiff to delay the building of his business for three days, as will be testified to by our witnesses, this indirectly hampered their ability to turn a profit sooner, in effect hindering them from three additional days of profit. If this monthly profit is divided by thirty-one that results in approximately $1,200 in damages for the three-day period, since no profit was made during the period as the plaintiff was hindered in his ability to finish setting up his business by having to confer with legal counsel.

#2 - Trademark

Upon further review, the Plaintiff will be amending the case to drop this charge. The Plaintiff's counsel incorrectly thought that a Sole Proprietorship could be formed without holding a corresponding DB account. However, according to Part I Section 2 clause 4 of the Legal Entity Act, "It shall be mandatory for an Incorporated Entity to have a corresponding in-game company in the business plugin."

Since the Plaintiff did not have a DB account by the name of "Gavy" at the time of the incident, the Plaintiff plans on amending the complaint to be solely addressing the Defamation and Slander charges. Such amendment will request damages for those charges as soon as the damages have been fully calculated.

#3 Conclusion

This being stated, the Plaintiff wishes to know if further damages will need to be shown at this time or if the above responses satisfy the court's order to show cause.

If so, the Plaintiff would like to request a 7-day extension to prepare precise calculations for the amendment as well as due to the fact that the Plaintiff's counsel will need to focus on the school week and will likely be unable to finalize a draft until next weekend.

Thus Submitted,
SniperElite508

Spoiler: P-004: $1,500 retainment of legal counsel.

Spoiler: P-005: BackwoodBoyzCo Monthly Sales