Lawsuit: Adjourned FTL consulting v. Naezaratheus [2025] DCR 41

[CoolChacha97]

Case Filing​

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

FTL CONSULTING (Mezimoří Legal Department - MZLD representing)
Plaintiff

v.

Naezaratheus
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

This case is a relatively simple contract case, my client was given a contract for 4 ads a day for 14 days. to this date totaling 56 ads, he has completed 44 ads. Upon reaching out to the defendant, no response was given, and in fact, the defendant left the Discord server where my client had a ticket with him. Naezaratheus has been permanently banned and deported but has not attempted to speak with someone with whom he had a contract. Meaning that any force majeure claim would effectively be void due to not reaching out under the Contracts Act, part 15, line 1. The first half of the payment has been delivered. The second half of the payment has not been delivered and we believe will never be without court action. We allege that the defendant violated the contract and duty of good faith due to leaving the discord server meant to contain communication about the contract.

I. Parties
FTL consulting
Naezaratheus

II. Facts
1. Both parties signed a contract agreeing to FTL consulting providing ads to Naezaratheus
2. To date 44/56 ads have been completed
3. The first 7000 DC dollars have been paid to FTL consulting
4. Naezaratheus has since left the discord and has not communicated with the plantiff since 5/25
III. Claims for relief
1. Breach of contract
Clause 7(1) of the Contracts Act states that "[a] breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations.
Naezaratheus breached the contract by failing to notify FTL Consulting about his ban and made no attempt to speak with FTL Consulting after his ban violating the "Any delivery issues or delays shall be communicated promptly." part of the contract
2. Violation of good faith and fair dealing
Clause 14 (1) states that "Parties to a contract shall perform their respective duties and exercise their rights under the contract in good faith and in a manner that is fair and just."
Naezaratheus has left the discord server and has not communicated with FTL Consulting since 5/22 and has made no attempt to contact FTL at the end of the 14 day period.

IV. Prayer for relief
1. Compensatory Damages
The plantiff seeks $7,000 in damages that would of been paid at the completion of the contract
2. Punitive damages
The plantiff seeks $5,000 in damages to discourage future conduct of this type
3. Legal fees
In line with the Legal Damages Act, the Plaintiff seeks 30% of damages awarded, and no less than $2,000, to be paid to Mezimoří Law.

V. Evidence
1. Contract

Naezaratheus In-game Advertisements Purchase Agreement

This In-Game Advertisement Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of 5/13/2025 by and between: Service Provider: FTL Consulting LLC Client: Naezaratheus Collectively referred to herein as the "Parties." --- 1. Scope of Services 1.1 Advertisement Delivery: FTL Co...

docs.google.com

2. Example ad
IMG_0989
3. Contract acceptance
image0
4. First 7k payment
Screenshot_2025-05-15
5. Message link of naez joining the discord server

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discord.com

6. Last attempted contact
IMG_1036
VI. Proof of representation
12700k rep

 

[Franciscus]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honor:

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if the are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. In previous cases, such as The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678 [2022] FCR 47, the Federal Court of Redmont has authorized freezing of Defendant assets during ongoing litigation in order to preserve the ability to actually collect an award in the case of a guilty verdict. As the Defendant is permanently deported, there is not risk of undue harm to or violation of the Defendant's rights; as the Supreme Court has noted, "deported players have no rights" (UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2).

Therefore, in order to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

1. Any funds present within the in-game balances of Naezaratheus or any other alternative accounts thereof;
2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by Naezaratheus or any other alternative accounts thereof (c.f. Evidence P-IN1);
3. Any other assets of Naezaratheus or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:
   1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
   2. Bank accounts at Voyager, Vanguard, Ryze, Cobblestone Bank, or any other bank;
   3. Financial accounts at The Exchange, Vanguard Market Access (or successor), or any other non-bank financial institution;
   4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
   5. Accounts receivable;
   6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
   7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
   8. Property held in any Vault;
   9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
   10. Automotive, aviation, or other vehicle assets;
   11. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
   12. Beneficial ownership in any trust.

Spoiler: Exhibit P-IN1

 

[JunkCereal]

Court Order

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
FTL consulting v. Naezaratheus [2025] DCR 41

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a contract.
2. The Defendant was permanently deported and would have failed to fulfill their obligations of said contract.

II. DEFENDANT’S POSITION
1. The Defendant has been permanently deported and therefore has no right to defense.

III. COURT OPINION
Permanently deported players do not enjoy the right of representation. Ligthiago v. FuriousPaladin [2023] FCR 79. For this reason, I’m entering this Default Judgement.

Since the Defendant was deported, it is clear that they would not have been able to uphold their obligations of the contract in question. This is a breach of contract according to the Contracts Act § 7.1, and § 7.1.a of the same act provides the Plaintiff an avenue to seek relief.

I don’t consider the Defendant’s acts outrageous as required by the Legal Damages Act § 5.2.a for punitive damages. The Defendant, though having committed some violation to be deported, was unable to - and did not necessarily choose not to - uphold their obligations. Due to this, I will not award punitive damages.

IV. DECISION
The District Court rules in favor of the Plaintiff and grants the following prayers for relief:
1. $7,000 in money or any available assets, payable to the Plaintiff.
2. $2,100, 30% of the damages awarded, in money or any available assets, payable to Mezimoří Legal Department - MZLD.

The District Court thanks all involved.