Lawsuit: Pending fickogames v. Ollie_MineCraft [2026] DCR 22

[emilypancakes22]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


fickogames
Plaintiff

v.
Ollie_MineCraft
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 14th of February, 2026, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff. Under the terms of the contract, the Plaintiff would supply the Defendant with the funds to pay for a property won in a DCT auction, and then the Defendant would transfer the property to the Plaintiff. After the Plaintiff sent the funds, the Defendant than removed the funds from their balance rather than paying for the property and became unresponsive to the Plaintiff's attempts at contact.

I. PARTIES
1. fickogames
2. Ollie_MineCraft

II. FACTS
1. On the 12th of February, 2026, the Defendant placed a winning bid of $28,000 on a DCT eviction auction for C117. (P-002)
2. On the 13th of February, 2026, the Defendant stated "i bought a diffrent property and can no longer aford it". (P-002)
3. The Plaintiff, who had placed the second highest bid on the property, offered to pay the Defendant the $28,000 to purchase the property in exchange for being given the property. (P-002)
4. On the 14th of February, 2026, the Defendant agreed to a contract with the Plaintiff giving him 2 days to purchase the property. (P-003, P-001)
5. On the 15th of February, 2026, at 10:26 the Plaintiff sent the $28,000 to the Defendant as outlined in the contract. (P-004)
6. The Defendant then posted a message in the auction thread stating "@Venne Montclair moneys in my acc lmk when you transfer plot". (P-005)
7. Approximately 4 hours later, the DCT Inspection Officer running the auction stated that the Defendant did not have the funds and posted a screenshot showing the Defendant's balance at $17.38.(P-005)
8. On the 17th of February, 2026, the Plaintiff messaged the Defendant stating "2 days is about to expire", "Hows the buying going". (P-006)
9. The Defendant has not responded to the Plaintiff's message. (P-006)
10. 48 hours have passed since the contract was signed and funds were transferred, and the Defendant has not purchased and transferred C117 to the Plaintiff.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant breached the contract by not purchasing and transferring the property, as such damages are applicable under Part III Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
2. The Defendant transferred or otherwise used the funds given to them by the Plaintiff for purposes other than purchasing C117, which is a breach of good faith as defined by section 12 of the Contracts Act.
3. The Defendant's behaviour in transfering or otherwise using the funds given to them outside of their intended purpose represents outrageous behavior as defined by Part III Section 3.2b of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
4. The Defendant's behaviour in transfering or otherwise using the funds given to them outside of their intended purpose represents an event "where there has been negligence, acceptance of unnecessary risk, or mismanagement", which means force majeure as outlined in Section 13 of the Contracts Act does not apply.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $40,000 in Liquidated Damages as outlined in the contract.
2. $40,000 in Punitive Damages for the outrageous conduct of using money sent in good faith for purposes outside the contract.
3. $3,000 or 30% of the case value, whichever is higher, in Legal Fees.

Spoiler: P-001

Contract between fickogames and Ollie_Minecraft (1).pdf

drive.google.com

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: Proof of representation

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18th day of February 2026.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Writ of Summons

@Ollie_MineCraft, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of fickogames v. Ollie_MineCraft [2026] DCR 22

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[gribble19]

Present, your Honor. I will be representing Ollie_MineCraft.

Spoiler: Proof of representation

 

[gribble19]

Objection

Objection - Breach of Procedure

Your Honor, all complaints must have details that meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 of our Court Rules and Procedures. See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 3.1. These criteria include showing to the court that the cause of injury was against the law and that remedy is applicable under relevant law. See id. at Rule 2.1. Defendant does not believe that the complaint filed here by the Plaintiff reaches this standard. The only reference to law or precedence in the entire complaint is "The Defendant has also not contacted the Plaintiff offering any sort of justification as required by the Contracts Act to mitigate damages" however even after a thorough read of the Contracts Act, Defendants council is unable to find this requirement in the law in question. As with regards to showing that remedy is applicable under relevant law, the Complaint does not even make an attempt to do so.

Defendant respectfully requests that Plaintiff is made to amend their complaint with clear references to law and/or precedent in order to meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 of our Court Rules and Procedures, such that the Defendant in this case can eventually properly respond to the Complaint in question, without having to play any guessing games. Alternatively, Defendant respectfully requests that this case be dismissed Sua Sponte for failure to meet all criteria set out under Rule 2.1 of the Court Rules and Procedures. See id. at Rule 2.2.

Thank you, your Honor.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Objection

Objection - Breach of Procedure

Your Honor, all complaints must have details that meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 of our Court Rules and Procedures. See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 3.1. These criteria include showing to the court that the cause of injury was against the law and that remedy is applicable under relevant law. See id. at Rule 2.1. Defendant does not believe that the complaint filed here by the Plaintiff reaches this standard. The only reference to law or precedence in the entire complaint is "The Defendant has also not contacted the Plaintiff offering any sort of justification as required by the Contracts Act to mitigate damages" however even after a thorough read of the Contracts Act, Defendants council is unable to find this requirement in the law in question. As with regards to showing that remedy is applicable under relevant law, the Complaint does not even make an attempt to do so.

Defendant respectfully requests that Plaintiff is made to amend their complaint with clear references to law and/or precedent in order to meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 of our Court Rules and Procedures, such that the Defendant in this case can eventually properly respond to the Complaint in question, without having to play any guessing games. Alternatively, Defendant respectfully requests that this case be dismissed Sua Sponte for failure to meet all criteria set out under Rule 2.1 of the Court Rules and Procedures. See id. at Rule 2.2.

Thank you, your Honor.

Sustained.

The Plaintiff is afforded 48 hours from this post to appropriately amend the complaint to satisfy the requirements of Rule 2.1 - Standing Application. In specific, the Plaintiff has not adequately shown the court which laws have been broken, and subsequently, the applicable remedy under said law.

Furthermore, Plaintiff is advised to fix the submission of evidence regarding P-001, as it is no longer accessible.

 

[TheSnowGuardian]

Sustained.

The Plaintiff is afforded 48 hours from this post to appropriately amend the complaint to satisfy the requirements of Rule 2.1 - Standing Application. In specific, the Plaintiff has not adequately shown the court which laws have been broken, and subsequently, the applicable remedy under said law.

Furthermore, Plaintiff is advised to fix the submission of evidence regarding P-001, as it is no longer accessible.

Your Honour, I am joining in as second-chair from Talion & Partners LLC, we request a sidebar

 

[emilypancakes22]

Sustained.

The Plaintiff is afforded 48 hours from this post to appropriately amend the complaint to satisfy the requirements of Rule 2.1 - Standing Application. In specific, the Plaintiff has not adequately shown the court which laws have been broken, and subsequently, the applicable remedy under said law.

Furthermore, Plaintiff is advised to fix the submission of evidence regarding P-001, as it is no longer accessible.

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Your Honor,
In accordance with your ruling, the Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint as follows:

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant breached contract by not purchasing and transferring the property. The Defendant has also not contacted the Plaintiff offering any sort of justification as required by the Contracts Act to mitigate damages.
2. The Defendant transferred or otherwise used the funds given to them by the Plaintiff for purposes other than purchasing C117, which represents a breach of good faith.
1. The Defendant breached the contract by not purchasing and transferring the property, as such damages are applicable under Part III Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
2. The Defendant transferred or otherwise used the funds given to them by the Plaintiff for purposes other than purchasing C117, which is a breach of good faith as defined by section 12 of the Contracts Act.
3. The Defendant's behaviour in transfering or otherwise using the funds given to them outside of their intended purpose represents outrageous behavior as defined by Part III Section 3.2b of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
4. The Defendant's behaviour in transfering or otherwise using the funds given to them outside of their intended purpose represents an event "where there has been negligence, acceptance of unnecessary risk, or mismanagement", which means force majeure as outlined in Section 13 of the Contracts Act does not apply.

where red text is removed and green is added.

Furthermore, the link in P-001 shall be updated to this link so that it remains accessible.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Your Honor,
In accordance with your ruling, the Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint as follows:


where red text is removed and green is added.

Furthermore, the link in P-001 shall be updated to this link so that it remains accessible.

Granted.

Please amend the complaint accordingly within the next 48 hours.

Your Honour, I am joining in as second-chair from Talion & Partners LLC, we request a sidebar

Please provide proof of representation/employment for the court.

Seperately, request for a sidebar is granted. Parties are to report to the judiciary discord within the next 48 hours.

 

[TheSnowGuardian]

Granted.

Please amend the complaint accordingly within the next 48 hours.



Please provide proof of representation/employment for the court.

Seperately, request for a sidebar is granted. Parties are to report to the judiciary discord within the next 48 hours.

Spoiler: Proof of Employment

 

[TheSnowGuardian]

Granted.

Please amend the complaint accordingly within the next 48 hours.



Please provide proof of representation/employment for the court.

Seperately, request for a sidebar is granted. Parties are to report to the judiciary discord within the next 48 hours.

Your Honour, pursuant to the above proof submitted before the Court, I shall ping you in the Judiciary server to include me in the sidebar.