Appeal: Accepted FCR 63 - Contempt Appeal

[Dartanboy]

- Client Name:  Dartanman
- Counsel Name:  Dartanman
- Were you originally the plaintiff or the defendant: Third Party filing Amicus Brief
- Reason for the Appeal:
Although it lacked the formatting, the Plaintiff's counsel essentially filed an objection against my request to file an Amicus Brief.

I was found to be contempt for responding to the objection.

The Objections Guide states clearly:
"The opposing party may answer the objection within 24 HOURS! The opposing party may answer to the objection without asking for permission from the presiding Judge."

Thus, as I was essentially responding to the objection, I should not have been found in contempt.

- Additional Information: Case link:

Lawsuit: In Session - bigpappa140 v. .BelatedDragon35 [2023] FCR 63

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION bigpappa140 (Represented by The Lovely Law Firm) Plaintiff v. .BelatedDragon35 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The defendant attempted to maliciously set up my client and smear...

www.democracycraft.net

 

[Dartanboy]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECUSE

I ask that the Hon. Justice Banana be recused from this case, as he made the original ruling to find me in contempt.

 

[Banana]

I am recusing myself from presiding over this case.

 

[Banana]

If it would please the Court, I request to present a short statement as a party mentioned in the case, in order to provide the Court with the context and rationale behind my decision.

 

[Milkcrack]

The Supreme Court has decided to halt this appeal until the end of the case.

 

[Milkcrack]

I believe the decision has been overturned already correct? @Dartanman

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, I do not believe so.

The contempt has simply not been actioned because of the appeal.

 

[Matthew100x]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal on the issue.

We move to dismiss the Contempt of Court charge as no prior warning was given to not make any additional posts. Warning should be given in order to effectively meet the requisite "fails to perform" of any judicial order or instruction.

No further conduct is needed at this time. The Supreme Court hereby orders the charge dismissed and orders the DOJ to reimburse the appellant of the fine as well as pay for any jail time under 20.1(b) of the Judicial Standards Act.​