- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
ẻtco
Plaintiff
v.
mvchrelle
Defendant
COMPLAINT
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On June 9, 2026, the Plaintiff, ẻtco a Generally is a New player, was running his shop on a regular day in the city, just trying to make his living by selling some diamonds he bought with his hard-earned money, and was setting up the price, and while being new didn't really know how to set it right, so made it higher the market price making it 10$ instead of 1$ both the Plaintiff and the Defendant noticed this as the Plaintiff was trying to fix it the Defendant caused the Wrongful Death of the Plaintiff while selling him diamonds at 10$ taking all the Plaitiff money After taking everything form the Plaintiff the Defendant ran off with his money after this the Plaitiff was able to fix his mistakes and call the cops but no one showed up and the Defendant was long gone.
I. PARTIES
1. etco - Plaintiff
2. Mychrelle - Defendant
II. FACTS
1. On June 9, 2026, the Plaintiff Etco was present at his shop in the city area of the Commonwealth of Redmont
2. The Plaintiff was in the city, so PVP combat is not permitted in the City
3. The Defendant, Mychrelle, initiated unprovoked combat against the Plaintiff.
4. The in-game system confirmed: "Mychrelle has murdered you! type /911 to report them to the authorities"
5. The Transactions logs show that Mvchrelle sold Diamonds to Etco for 10$ as 16x10=160
6. The Plaintiff was a brand new player with no weapons, no armour, and no means to defend themselves.
7. The Plaintiff called /911 to report the Defendant's conduct to the authorities following the attacks, but no one showed up.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
CLAIM I: WRONGFUL DEATH — Criminal Code Act
The Criminal Code Act defines Murder as the unlawful killing of another player.
PvP combat is not permitted in Aventura.
The Defendant unlawfully caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiff in the city without provocation.
An instance of wrongful death constitutes a separate civil claim under the Criminal Code Act.
The Plaintiff brings one count of Wrongful Death against the Defendant.
CLAIM II: CIVIL DAMAGES ARISING FROM CRIMINAL CONDUCT — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 1
The Redmont Civil Code Act provides: "The definitions and rules for damages in this Part apply to all civil matters under this Code, including claims for civil damages arising from criminal conduct."
The Defendant's one instance of wrongful death against the Plaintiff constitutes criminal conduct giving rise to civil damages.
Conviction of a criminal offence is not required for a crime to be regarded as a fact in a civil lawsuit.
CLAIM IV: PUNITIVE DAMAGES — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 3
Punitive damages are available where the Defendant's conduct was outrageous.
Outrageous conduct means conduct that demonstrates a substantial departure from acceptable standards of behavior and reflects a willful, dishonest, oppressive, reckless, or grossly negligent disregard for the rights, interests, or safety of others.
The Defendant's conduct was outrageous for the following reasons:
(a) The Defendant caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiff without any provocation whatsoever.
(b) The Defendant deliberately targeted a brand new player who had been on the server for only 1 day, with no weapons, no armour, and no means to defend themselves.
(c) The nature of the attacks — a wrongful death of the defenceless new player and taking his money through his shop while he was trying to change it — demonstrates deliberate, calculated, and predatory conduct.
(d) making punitive damages necessary not only to punish the Defendant but also to deter this habitual behaviour in the future, to make sure they won't do this to another player again.
The Plaintiff seeks $5,000 in punitive damages.
CLAIM V: CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES — LOSS OF ENJOYMENT — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 5
Loss of Enjoyment is available where an injured party loses, or has diminished, their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm.
The Plaintiff had just begun their first day in the Commonwealth of Redmont, intending to make their living selling diamonds and other Resources and enjoy the server for the first time.
The Defendant's unprovoked instance of his wrongful death on the Plaintiff's very first day severely and permanently diminished the Plaintiff's first experience in Redmont.
The Plaintiff was unable to run his shop as a result of the Defendant's conduct.
A reasonable person in the same circumstances — suffering a wrongful death as a brand new player on their very first day in a city that has laws about no killing and with no cops showing up to help him, with also no weapons, no armour, and no means of defence — would experience a significant and lasting loss of enjoyment.
As punitive damages are also being sought in this matter, the consequential damages cap of $50,000 does not apply per the Redmont Civil Code Act.
The Plaintiff seeks $10,000 in consequential damages for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
$5,000 in punitive damages for the Defendant's outrageous, repeated, and habitual criminal conduct
View attachment 85186
View attachment 85187
View attachment 85188
VI. REPRESENTATION
The Plaintiff, etco, asked a licensed Barrister Wow_wow_o to represent them in this matter.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of June 2026
CIVIL ACTION
ẻtco
Plaintiff
v.
mvchrelle
Defendant
COMPLAINT
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On June 9, 2026, the Plaintiff, ẻtco a Generally is a New player, was running his shop on a regular day in the city, just trying to make his living by selling some diamonds he bought with his hard-earned money, and was setting up the price, and while being new didn't really know how to set it right, so made it higher the market price making it 10$ instead of 1$ both the Plaintiff and the Defendant noticed this as the Plaintiff was trying to fix it the Defendant caused the Wrongful Death of the Plaintiff while selling him diamonds at 10$ taking all the Plaitiff money After taking everything form the Plaintiff the Defendant ran off with his money after this the Plaitiff was able to fix his mistakes and call the cops but no one showed up and the Defendant was long gone.
I. PARTIES
1. etco - Plaintiff
2. Mychrelle - Defendant
II. FACTS
1. On June 9, 2026, the Plaintiff Etco was present at his shop in the city area of the Commonwealth of Redmont
2. The Plaintiff was in the city, so PVP combat is not permitted in the City
3. The Defendant, Mychrelle, initiated unprovoked combat against the Plaintiff.
4. The in-game system confirmed: "Mychrelle has murdered you! type /911 to report them to the authorities"
5. The Transactions logs show that Mvchrelle sold Diamonds to Etco for 10$ as 16x10=160
6. The Plaintiff was a brand new player with no weapons, no armour, and no means to defend themselves.
7. The Plaintiff called /911 to report the Defendant's conduct to the authorities following the attacks, but no one showed up.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
CLAIM I: WRONGFUL DEATH — Criminal Code Act
The Criminal Code Act defines Murder as the unlawful killing of another player.
PvP combat is not permitted in Aventura.
The Defendant unlawfully caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiff in the city without provocation.
An instance of wrongful death constitutes a separate civil claim under the Criminal Code Act.
The Plaintiff brings one count of Wrongful Death against the Defendant.
CLAIM II: CIVIL DAMAGES ARISING FROM CRIMINAL CONDUCT — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 1
The Redmont Civil Code Act provides: "The definitions and rules for damages in this Part apply to all civil matters under this Code, including claims for civil damages arising from criminal conduct."
The Defendant's one instance of wrongful death against the Plaintiff constitutes criminal conduct giving rise to civil damages.
Conviction of a criminal offence is not required for a crime to be regarded as a fact in a civil lawsuit.
CLAIM IV: PUNITIVE DAMAGES — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 3
Punitive damages are available where the Defendant's conduct was outrageous.
Outrageous conduct means conduct that demonstrates a substantial departure from acceptable standards of behavior and reflects a willful, dishonest, oppressive, reckless, or grossly negligent disregard for the rights, interests, or safety of others.
The Defendant's conduct was outrageous for the following reasons:
(a) The Defendant caused the wrongful death of the Plaintiff without any provocation whatsoever.
(b) The Defendant deliberately targeted a brand new player who had been on the server for only 1 day, with no weapons, no armour, and no means to defend themselves.
(c) The nature of the attacks — a wrongful death of the defenceless new player and taking his money through his shop while he was trying to change it — demonstrates deliberate, calculated, and predatory conduct.
(d) making punitive damages necessary not only to punish the Defendant but also to deter this habitual behaviour in the future, to make sure they won't do this to another player again.
The Plaintiff seeks $5,000 in punitive damages.
CLAIM V: CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES — LOSS OF ENJOYMENT — Redmont Civil Code Act Part III Section 5
Loss of Enjoyment is available where an injured party loses, or has diminished, their ability to engage in certain activities in the way that the injured party did before the harm.
The Plaintiff had just begun their first day in the Commonwealth of Redmont, intending to make their living selling diamonds and other Resources and enjoy the server for the first time.
The Defendant's unprovoked instance of his wrongful death on the Plaintiff's very first day severely and permanently diminished the Plaintiff's first experience in Redmont.
The Plaintiff was unable to run his shop as a result of the Defendant's conduct.
A reasonable person in the same circumstances — suffering a wrongful death as a brand new player on their very first day in a city that has laws about no killing and with no cops showing up to help him, with also no weapons, no armour, and no means of defence — would experience a significant and lasting loss of enjoyment.
As punitive damages are also being sought in this matter, the consequential damages cap of $50,000 does not apply per the Redmont Civil Code Act.
The Plaintiff seeks $10,000 in consequential damages for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
$5,000 in punitive damages for the Defendant's outrageous, repeated, and habitual criminal conduct
- $10,000 in consequential damages for Loss of Enjoyment in Redmont
- Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.
Total: 15,000
View attachment 85186
View attachment 85187
View attachment 85188
VI. REPRESENTATION
The Plaintiff, etco, asked a licensed Barrister Wow_wow_o to represent them in this matter.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of June 2026