Lawsuit: In Session End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39

[End]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


End
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Executive has failed in its duties and judicial intervention is required to remedy an unjust employment termination.

I. PARTIES
(1) xEndeavour
(2) Commonwealth (Department of Construction and Transport)

II. FACTS
(1) The Plaintiff was employed as a Constructor in the Department of Construction and Transport for a period of five years.
(2) The Plaintiff was widely recognised as one of the most active and productive members of the Department during their employment.
(3) On 30 March 2025, the Plaintiff informed the Secretary of the Department of a temporary period of inactivity due to StateCraft commitments.
(4) The Secretary acknowledged and accepted this notification without raising any objections or issuing a warning.
(5) Despite this, the Plaintiff was terminated from the Department on the basis of inactivity during the acknowledged absence.
(6) The Plaintiff was not given any formal warning, disciplinary process, or opportunity to respond before the dismissal.
(7) There was no indication that the Department was undergoing financial hardship or operational downsizing that necessitated the Plaintiff’s termination.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
(1) The Plaintiff asserts that the termination constitutes unfair dismissal under s13 of the Commercial Standards Act.
(2) The dismissal was not made under s13.1(a), as no business necessity or operational reasoning was presented to justify the termination.
(3) The dismissal was not made under s13.1(b), as the Plaintiff’s continued employment posed no detriment to the Department’s workflow, reputation, or legal standing.
(4) The dismissal violates s13.1(d), as a reasonable person would not consider it fair to terminate a long-serving employee for temporary inactivity that had been communicated and acknowledged.
(5) The Defendant failed to afford procedural fairness and acted in a manner inconsistent with established employee protections.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
(1) A declaration that the Plaintiff’s dismissal was unfair under s13 of the Commercial Standards Act.
(2) An order compelling the Defendant to reinstate the Plaintiff to their former position within the Department.
(3) Reasonable compensation for reputational damage and loss of employment caused by the Defendant’s conduct.
(4) Punitive compensation for unlawful conduct.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 5th day of May 2025

 

[End]

P-001
Dismissal Message 1/2

P-002
Dismissal Message 2/2

P-003
Discussion that notice was provided

P-004
Discussion that notice was provided

P-005
Links to relevant messages in the DCT Discord that indicates a strong and consistent pattern of activity prior to going on a leave of absence.

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games

Discord is great for playing games and chilling with friends, or even building a worldwide community. Customize your own space to talk, play, and hang out.

discordapp.com

P-006
Further notification of absence

P-007
Continuing to respond to voting

P-008
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-009
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-010
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-011
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-012
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-013
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-014
Continuing to respond to discussion

P-015
Continue to respond to discussion

No evidence of project assignment because it doesn't exist.

 

[juniperfig]

Writ of Summons

@Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of End v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 39.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Nim]

I hope Vroomba realizes that End and Nacho do most of the projects.

 

[Vroomba]

Yes I am completely unaware of what goes on in my department

 

[Nim]

The sad part is we do not have judges to determine that

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

I will be taking over this case following the (Frmr.) Honourable Judge juniperfig's untimely resignation. All deadlines will remain in effect.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

On a further note, let all members of the Commonwealth hereby be warned. Anyone to speak out of turn in this court, if they were not summoned, or not requested to speak, will be punished severely.

 

[Freeze_Line]

The Commonwealth is present.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

The Commonwealth has 72 hours to file an answer to complaint.

 

[Freeze_Line]

Requesting a 24-hour extension, Your Honor. I just finished most of my finals and would like some time to confirm a few details with the relevant parties before submitting the answer to the complaint.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Granted. You have 24 hours from this post.

 

[SumoMC]

Your Honor,

As the Attorney General resigned this morning, i as the Solicitor General request a 72 Hours extension on behalf od the commonwealth in this case.

 

[End]

Objection

The commonwealth has had 4 days. I appreciate that the AG has just resigned but this does not warrant an extra three days.

 

[juniperfig]

Your honour,

I would like to offer my deepest apologies for the lack of response in this case. I was not anticipating having a new job so soon, and as the (very short-lived) former presiding officer in this case, I'm unable to continue it as the Attorney General.

I humbly request a 48 hour extension from the time of this posting to file an Answer to Complaint.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Objection

The commonwealth has had 4 days. I appreciate that the AG has just resigned but this does not warrant an extra three days.

Sustained. The Commonwealth has had an excess of time to file an answer to complaint. Failure to manage manpower and cases is no excuse for delaying a trial. They will be charged with contempt of court.

Your honour,

I would like to offer my deepest apologies for the lack of response in this case. I was not anticipating having a new job so soon, and as the (very short-lived) former presiding officer in this case, I'm unable to continue it as the Attorney General.

I humbly request a 48 hour extension from the time of this posting to file an Answer to Complaint.

This is yet another poor show from the Commonwealth. Is there truly no organisation whatsoever in the department?

The Commonwealth will be afforded a final, 24 hours to post an Answer to Complaint. No extension. Failure to meet this deadline will result in summary judgement, as the Commonwealth has wasted enough of the court's time as it is.

 

[aubunny]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

End
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth Of Redmont
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The Defense AFFIRMS that the Plaintiff was employed as a Constructor in the Department of Construction and Transport for a long time.
2. The Defense NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES that the Plaintiff was widely recognized as one of the most active and productive members of the Department during their employment.
3. The Defense DENIES that on 30 March 2025, the Plaintiff informed the Secretary of the Department of a temporary period of inactivity due to StateCraft commitments.
4. The Defense DENIES that the Secretary acknowledged and accepted this notification.
5. The Defense AFFIRMS that the Plaintiff was terminated from the Department but NEITHER AFFIRMS NOR DENIES that it was solely on the basis of inactivity.
6. The Defense AFFIRMS that the Plaintiff was not given a former warning or a chance to respond before disciplinary action.
7. The Defense DENIES that there was no indication that the Department was undergoing financial hardship or operational downsizing that necessitated the Plaintiff’s termination.

II. DEFENCES

1. Fact 3 States that there was a LoA as of March 30th, but neglects to admit that his period of inactivity spans much earlier than the point of the given date. As is listed within [D-01]

2. The defendant misconstrues the text behind the Commercial Standards Act, as 13.1(a) does not necessitate financial hardships, and a lengthy, unknown period of inactivity is more than enough reason to fire someone under the clause of necessity to continue efficient operation of the terminating party.

3. The defendant underplays the obstruction to workflow that being inactive for months on end would play into an ever-changing department. Thus would his firing would also meet the requirements of the Commercial Standards Act 13.1(b)

4. The defendant did not list an estimated return date in his claimed LoA, as is customary for DCT employees, The defendant however continued to make claims a few days later claiming that the reason why he refuses to do work within the DCT due to the new changes within the internal payment structure [D-02], This implies that the defendant was capable of returning to normal obligation and duties at the time of the message, but chose not to as an act of defiance against current policies, chosing to instead act as a brick wall obstructing the flow of the department. The defendant has only listed vague terms like "soon", whereas no reasonable person would take soon to be over a month from now.

5. The defense states in fact 4 that the Secretary of the DCT accepted the LoA. Still, evidence shows that there was no certain terms of acceptance, only acknowledgement of the secretary's own hard work in light of the plantiffs absence, saying "Thanks for acknowledging that" in response to "Its good to see you and ik you arent getting much support" [P-003]. With fact 4 in contest for being an unauthorized LoA, fact 5 would be provably false as there is no acknowledged absence.

6. Fact 2 can neither be confirmed nor denied due to perceived activity going unsaid by various employees.



III. Evidence:

Spoiler: D-01

Spoiler: D-02

IV. Witnesses:
Vroomba
xEndeavor
Goldblooded

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 12 day of May, 2025

 

[aubunny]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

The plaintiff lists P-005 as a list of continued activity within the department, yet it is actually a list of dead links.

The plaintiff lists under P-015 "No evidence of assigned project because it doesn't exist," which is inappropriate evidence submission and just conjecture and fluff.

 

[End]

Objection

OBJECTION
Perjury

The plaintiff lists P-005 as a list of continued activity within the department, yet it is actually a list of dead links.

The links are active, you need to join the Department of Construction and Transport to view them. They are in public channels.

 

[End]

Objection

OBJECTION
Relevance, Narrative

The Defendant introduces irrelevant information that does not pertain to the specific allegations of unfair dismissal in this case.

Specifically, I was fired for inactivity and lack of progress.

Any broader commentary on departmental expectations, unrelated policy justifications, or generalised remarks about workplace conduct are immaterial to the core issue: whether the dismissal was procedurally fair and lawfully executed under the applicable standards.

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court strikes the additional material and confine consideration to the conduct and circumstances directly surrounding the dismissal.

 

[End]

Objection

OBJECTION
Speculation

The Defendant speculates about the department's operational requirements without providing evidence to substantiate such claims.

 

[End]

Objection

OBJECTION
Relevance

The Defence’s interpretation of s.13.1(a/b) of the Commercial Standards Act is not relevant to the issues properly before the Court.

The Defence misrepresents these provisions by treating them as a blanket justification for dismissal based on perceived inefficiency alone. In fact, both clauses require a necessity for continued operation and must be applied in accordance with the principles of natural justice, including fair warning, and procedural fairness.

The Plaintiff’s case does not dispute the existence of s.13.1, but rather challenges whether its requirements were met in this instance, specifically whether the dismissal was necessary, reasonable, and procedurally fair. The Defence’s hypothetical reading of the Act is irrelevant to the factual and procedural failures at the heart of this matter.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE

The plaintiff lists P-005 as a list of continued activity within the department, yet it is actually a list of dead links.

The plaintiff lists under P-015 "No evidence of assigned project because it doesn't exist," which is inappropriate evidence submission and just conjecture and fluff.

The Objection to P-005 is Overruled.

The Objection to P-015 is Sustained. I shall give the Plaintiff 24 hours to defend this piece of evidence, and shall subsequently strike it if it fails to meet standard.

Objection

OBJECTION
Perjury



The links are active, you need to join the Department of Construction and Transport to view them. They are in public channels.

Sustained.

On the off-chance that the defense attorney was simply ignorant of this fact, I will not be recommending a perjury charge. However, given that the evidence is specifically labelled with "Links to relevant messages in the DCT Discord that indicates a strong and consistent pattern of activity prior to going on a leave of absence.", I find it more likely that ignorance is the contributing factor to this false objection rather than a desire to deceive the court.

Let the Defense Attorney be warned.

Objection

OBJECTION
Relevance, Narrative

The Defendant introduces irrelevant information that does not pertain to the specific allegations of unfair dismissal in this case.

Specifically, I was fired for inactivity and lack of progress.

Any broader commentary on departmental expectations, unrelated policy justifications, or generalised remarks about workplace conduct are immaterial to the core issue: whether the dismissal was procedurally fair and lawfully executed under the applicable standards.

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court strikes the additional material and confine consideration to the conduct and circumstances directly surrounding the dismissal.

Overruled.

It is quite silly to assume that departmental expectations, departmental policy modifications or remarks about workplace conduct do not relate to your disputed dismissal.

Objection

OBJECTION
Relevance

The Defence’s interpretation of s.13.1(a/b) of the Commercial Standards Act is not relevant to the issues properly before the Court.

The Defence misrepresents these provisions by treating them as a blanket justification for dismissal based on perceived inefficiency alone. In fact, both clauses require a necessity for continued operation and must be applied in accordance with the principles of natural justice, including fair warning, and procedural fairness.

The Plaintiff’s case does not dispute the existence of s.13.1, but rather challenges whether its requirements were met in this instance, specifically whether the dismissal was necessary, reasonable, and procedurally fair. The Defence’s hypothetical reading of the Act is irrelevant to the factual and procedural failures at the heart of this matter.

Overruled.

It is not your place to determine whether the Defense's defenses are relevant or not. I find that their interpretation of the Commercial Standards Act is quite relevant, as it poses an alternative to your interpretation, as well as shed some light into the decision-making process undergone by the officials in question, given that it is being used as a defense.


On another note, let both parties be warned that objection-spam will not be tolerated. If you wish to object to several things, post all objections in 1 post. Repeated frivolous objections will be sanctioned accordingly, but let both parties be reassured that this has not been breached at all in this case as of now.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

With that out of the way, the Plaintiff is afforded 48 hours to post their Opening Statement. Please request a time extension if necessary. Failure to comply with court deadlines will result in punishment.

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

Apologies, I am frankly way too tired right now. Ignore the previous order. Discovery is set for 72 hours.

 

[End]

Interrogatories

1. State the exact date the decision to terminate the Plaintiff was made and the reasoning relied upon at that time.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Identify the exact date you first considered the Plaintiff inactive, and explain why no warning or inquiry was issued at that time.

4. Admit or deny: At no point did the Department formally request the Plaintiff to clarify, revise, or withdraw their communicated leave of absence.

5. Admit or deny: The Department does not have a written or public policy requiring estimated return dates as a condition for accepting leave of absence notifications.

Requests for Production

1. All internal messages showing deliberation or justification for the Plaintiff’s dismissal, between Department Leadership and or the President/Vice President.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Provide where the Secretary asked if the Plaintiff had completed their period of inactivity, as previously advised.

4. A list or anonymised summary of employees terminated for inactivity in the last 12 months, including length of inactivity and whether a warning was issued.

5. The date of D-001

Witnesses

1. Vroomba

 

[End]

The Objection to P-015 is Sustained. I shall give the Plaintiff 24 hours to defend this piece of evidence, and shall subsequently strike it if it fails to meet standard.

P-015 is separate to the comment made at the bottom of the thread.

I have noted that I cannot provide evidence of project assignment because I was not assigned anything. Strike the comment if you wish, but it's unrelated to P-015.

 

[End]

It is quite silly to assume that departmental expectations, departmental policy modifications or remarks about workplace conduct do not relate to your disputed dismissal.

Response

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

I acknowledge the Court’s view that departmental policies and expectations sometimes help explain the context of a dismissal. However, I maintains that the Defendant’s comments go well beyond relevant background and instead introduce broad, narrative claims that:

• Were not cited at the time of the dismissal (inactivity and lack of progress),
• Appear to be after-the-fact justifications rather than reasons actually relied upon.

These statements risk distracting from the real issue and legal question at hand: whether the Plaintiff’s dismissal followed fair procedure, and whether the Department genuinely applied s.13.1 of the Commercial Standards Act in a lawful and transparent way.

The defence is trying to impugn my character by introducing irrelevant context into the question and the case. Again, I emphasise this case is not about unfair dismissal on the grounds of being belligerent or insubordinate, this is about my activity in the department and that alone.

 

[aubunny]

Response

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

I acknowledge the Court’s view that departmental policies and expectations sometimes help explain the context of a dismissal. However, I maintains that the Defendant’s comments go well beyond relevant background and instead introduce broad, narrative claims that:

• Were not cited at the time of the dismissal (inactivity and lack of progress),
• Appear to be after-the-fact justifications rather than reasons actually relied upon.

These statements risk distracting from the real issue and legal question at hand: whether the Plaintiff’s dismissal followed fair procedure, and whether the Department genuinely applied s.13.1 of the Commercial Standards Act in a lawful and transparent way.

The defence is trying to impugn my character by introducing irrelevant context into the question and the case. Again, I emphasise this case is not about unfair dismissal on the grounds of being belligerent or insubordinate, this is about my activity in the department and that alone.

Your honor, may the defense submit a response?

 

[aubunny]

Interrogatories

1. State the exact date the decision to terminate the Plaintiff was made and the reasoning relied upon at that time.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Identify the exact date you first considered the Plaintiff inactive, and explain why no warning or inquiry was issued at that time.

4. Admit or deny: At no point did the Department formally request the Plaintiff to clarify, revise, or withdraw their communicated leave of absence.

5. Admit or deny: The Department does not have a written or public policy requiring estimated return dates as a condition for accepting leave of absence notifications.

Requests for Production

1. All internal messages showing deliberation or justification for the Plaintiff’s dismissal, between Department Leadership and or the President/Vice President.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Provide where the Secretary asked if the Plaintiff had completed their period of inactivity, as previously advised.

4. A list or anonymised summary of employees terminated for inactivity in the last 12 months, including length of inactivity and whether a warning was issued.

5. The date of D-001

Witnesses

1. Vroomba

Response to 4 AND 5: The Defense Denies both statements.
There was never an LOA. If there had been, the Plaintiff would have posted it properly in the relations channel, as he has done multiple times before. Simply DMing someone that "I can't help a lot right now because I'm busy, but I will help again soon" [paraphrased] does not constitute filing an LOA for over a month, and claiming that it does is completely unreasonable.

 

[aubunny]

Interrogatories

1. State the exact date the decision to terminate the Plaintiff was made and the reasoning relied upon at that time.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Identify the exact date you first considered the Plaintiff inactive, and explain why no warning or inquiry was issued at that time.

4. Admit or deny: At no point did the Department formally request the Plaintiff to clarify, revise, or withdraw their communicated leave of absence.

5. Admit or deny: The Department does not have a written or public policy requiring estimated return dates as a condition for accepting leave of absence notifications.

Requests for Production

1. All internal messages showing deliberation or justification for the Plaintiff’s dismissal, between Department Leadership and or the President/Vice President.

2. Provide the Department policy which describes how leave of absence requests, including how they must be submitted, and whether estimated return dates are mandatory.

3. Provide where the Secretary asked if the Plaintiff had completed their period of inactivity, as previously advised.

4. A list or anonymised summary of employees terminated for inactivity in the last 12 months, including length of inactivity and whether a warning was issued.

5. The date of D-001

Witnesses

1. Vroomba

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Compound Question:
Questions 1, 2, and 3 are all compounding questions, including multiple questions within the same Interrogatory submission, and the defense requests that they be struck from the record.

 

[aubunny]

Your honor,

The defense moves to admit the following screenshots into evidence:

 

[Dr_Eksplosive]

View attachment 55051

P-015 is separate to the comment made at the bottom of the thread.

I have noted that I cannot provide evidence of project assignment because I was not assigned anything. Strike the comment if you wish, but it's unrelated to P-015.

I'll allow this.

Response

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

I acknowledge the Court’s view that departmental policies and expectations sometimes help explain the context of a dismissal. However, I maintains that the Defendant’s comments go well beyond relevant background and instead introduce broad, narrative claims that:

• Were not cited at the time of the dismissal (inactivity and lack of progress),
• Appear to be after-the-fact justifications rather than reasons actually relied upon.

These statements risk distracting from the real issue and legal question at hand: whether the Plaintiff’s dismissal followed fair procedure, and whether the Department genuinely applied s.13.1 of the Commercial Standards Act in a lawful and transparent way.

The defence is trying to impugn my character by introducing irrelevant context into the question and the case. Again, I emphasise this case is not about unfair dismissal on the grounds of being belligerent or insubordinate, this is about my activity in the department and that alone.

Denied.

I am quite capable of remaining focused on the disputed matters. I find that their arguments remain somewhat relevant. If you feel they are ignoring your arguments, their loss. This decision is final.

Your honor, may the defense submit a response?

It is not required.

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Compound Question:
Questions 1, 2, and 3 are all compounding questions, including multiple questions within the same Interrogatory submission, and the defense requests that they be struck from the record.

Sustained.

Questions are hereby struck. The Plaintiff may separate them into smaller questions and resubmit them if they so choose.