- Joined
- Oct 4, 2024
- Messages
- 131
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF DEMOCRACYCRAFT
Ebborsnam, Plaintiff
v.
smallfries, Defendant
Civil Action No. 2026-___
COMPLAINT
I. PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Ebborsnam is a citizen of DemocracyCraft.
2. Defendant smallfries is a citizen of DemocracyCraft and may be served through the applicable in-game or Discord procedures.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because the events giving rise to the lawsuit occurred within DemocracyCraft.
4. Venue is proper because Defendant resides, operates, or otherwise commits suspicious activities within the jurisdiction of this Court.
III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. On or about August 10, 2026, Plaintiff was minding their own business when Defendant smallfries committed the extraordinarily serious offense of being annoying.
6. Defendant subsequently made statements and/or actions that caused Plaintiff severe emotional distress, confusion, and an approximately 37% reduction in their enjoyment of DemocracyCraft.
7. Plaintiff attempted to resolve the matter peacefully by staring at Defendant for several seconds.
8. Defendant failed to take the hint.
9. Plaintiff therefore brings this action seeking justice, accountability, and preferably enough money to buy something unnecessary.
IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
10. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–9.
11. Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty to refrain from being unnecessarily annoying.
12. Defendant breached this duty.
13. As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff suffered damages.
COUNT II — INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
14. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–13.
15. Defendant's conduct was outrageous, unreasonable, and frankly rather inconvenient.
16. Plaintiff suffered emotional distress as a result.
COUNT III — GENERAL VIOLATION OF COMMON SENSE
17. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–16.
18. Defendant's conduct violated the generally accepted principle that people should simply behave normally.
19. Plaintiff seeks appropriate relief from this Court.
V. DAMAGES
20. Plaintiff seeks:
a. $10,000 in compensatory damages;
b. $25,000 in punitive damages;
c. Reimbursement for Plaintiff's time spent dealing with Defendant;
d. A formal apology from Defendant;
e. An order requiring Defendant to think about what they have done; and
f. Any other relief the Court considers just and proper.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Ebborsnam respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant smallfries;
B. Award Plaintiff $35,000 in damages;
C. Require Defendant to issue a public apology;
D. Award any other relief the Court deems appropriate; and
E. Grant such other and further relief as the Court finds just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Ebborsnam
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Date: August 10, 2026
Ebborsnam, Plaintiff
v.
smallfries, Defendant
Civil Action No. 2026-___
COMPLAINT
I. PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Ebborsnam is a citizen of DemocracyCraft.
2. Defendant smallfries is a citizen of DemocracyCraft and may be served through the applicable in-game or Discord procedures.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because the events giving rise to the lawsuit occurred within DemocracyCraft.
4. Venue is proper because Defendant resides, operates, or otherwise commits suspicious activities within the jurisdiction of this Court.
III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. On or about August 10, 2026, Plaintiff was minding their own business when Defendant smallfries committed the extraordinarily serious offense of being annoying.
6. Defendant subsequently made statements and/or actions that caused Plaintiff severe emotional distress, confusion, and an approximately 37% reduction in their enjoyment of DemocracyCraft.
7. Plaintiff attempted to resolve the matter peacefully by staring at Defendant for several seconds.
8. Defendant failed to take the hint.
9. Plaintiff therefore brings this action seeking justice, accountability, and preferably enough money to buy something unnecessary.
IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
10. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–9.
11. Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty to refrain from being unnecessarily annoying.
12. Defendant breached this duty.
13. As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff suffered damages.
COUNT II — INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
14. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–13.
15. Defendant's conduct was outrageous, unreasonable, and frankly rather inconvenient.
16. Plaintiff suffered emotional distress as a result.
COUNT III — GENERAL VIOLATION OF COMMON SENSE
17. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1–16.
18. Defendant's conduct violated the generally accepted principle that people should simply behave normally.
19. Plaintiff seeks appropriate relief from this Court.
V. DAMAGES
20. Plaintiff seeks:
a. $10,000 in compensatory damages;
b. $25,000 in punitive damages;
c. Reimbursement for Plaintiff's time spent dealing with Defendant;
d. A formal apology from Defendant;
e. An order requiring Defendant to think about what they have done; and
f. Any other relief the Court considers just and proper.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Ebborsnam respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant smallfries;
B. Award Plaintiff $35,000 in damages;
C. Require Defendant to issue a public apology;
D. Award any other relief the Court deems appropriate; and
E. Grant such other and further relief as the Court finds just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
Ebborsnam
Plaintiff, Pro Se
Date: August 10, 2026