Lawsuit: Dismissed Dearev & GlobalCenter Corporation v. Voyager Group [2025] FCR 74

[dearev]

​

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Dearev
GlobalCenter
Plaintiffs

v.

Voyager Group
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

Voyager Group has neglected its contractual duties and caused harm to the plaintiffs as a result.

I. PARTIES
1. Dearev - Plaintiff
2. GlobalCenter - Plaintiff
3. Voyager Group - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. Voyager is a Registered Financial Institution with the DoC
2. Financial Institutions have an obligation to keep depositor's funds safe
3. GlobalCenter has a total of $44,510.00 in their Voyager account
4. Dearev has a total of $358,649.00 in his Voyager account
5. Voyager Failed to protect the plaintiffs funds
6. The Department of Commerce has commandered Voyager Group
7. The Damages caused by Voyager Group's Negligence towards customer's funds has caused damages to both plaintiff's
8. Voyager had a Majority of its Depositors funds in TEX-001 bonds
9. Voyager's assets have been seized by the Department of Commerce
10. p-002 and p-003 are the last known deposits/withdraws made by GlobalCenter and Dearev.
11. p-001 is Voyger Group's Terms of Service

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. 2 counts of Breach of Contract
2. 2 counts of Negligence
3. 1 count of Fraud
4. 2 counts of Misrepresentation

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $44,510.00 to be paid to GlobalCenter in Compensatory Damages
2. $358,649.00 to be paid to Dearev in Compensatory Damages
3. $50,000.00 to be paid to each plaintiff as Consequential Damages
4. $153,947.70, in legal fees, representing 30% of the total value of the case, pursuant to Section 9 of the Legal Damages Act.


witnesses:
Louder_Leo
Freeze_line
Avaneesh2008
DonTrillions
Stoppers

Spoiler: P-001

Terms of Agreement

Terms of Agreement Dated 2 February 2025 2. Table of Content 2. Table of Content 2 3. Introduction 2 4. Scope of Services 2 5. Customer Responsibilities 3 6. Bank's Responsibilities 3 7. Account Management 3 8. Transaction Terms 4 9. Fees and Charges 4 10. Interest Rates and Loans 5 ...

docs.google.com

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 26th day of july 2025

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION

The plaintiff requests that all of Voyager's assets be frozen for the remainder of this case and that the Department of commerce does not liquidate them for the remainder of this case, doing so could harm the Plaintiffs;

 

[dearev]

Evidence

The plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admited into evidence

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Both of these screenshots were collected from link and they are significant to prove negligence by Voyager's Group in Reporting to the DoC which had a significant impact leading to the actions mentioned in the lawsuit.

 

[ameslap]

@dearev please provide who the ping for summons should go to for Voyager Group.

Scratch that, no need to provide.

 

[ameslap]

Writ of Summons

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of
Dearev & GlobalCenter Corporation v. Voyager Group [2025] FCR 74.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[ameslap]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION

The plaintiff requests that all of Voyager's assets be frozen for the remainder of this case and that the Department of commerce does not liquidate them for the remainder of this case, doing so could harm the Plaintiffs;

The Emergency Injunction is hereby granted in part. All of Voyager's assets are to be frozen and the DoC may not liquidate them until the Government is given a chance to respond to the EI and a final ruling is made.

 

[ameslap]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
DISMISSAL
Dearev & GlobalCenter Corporation v. Voyager Group - [2025] FCR 74
Civil Action

I will be dismissing this case for Sua Sponte (rule 2.2). There are a couple of points that I feel are important to cover in this dismissal:

I. Standing Application
In order for a plaintiff to pursue a case, they must show the following to the court:

1. Suffered some injury caused by a clear second party; or is affected by an application of law. - Yes, but not by this second party. The Claims for relief are against “Voyager Group” which is now in the hands of the Government. The Government did not cause any injury, and as such this case should have been brought against the former operators of Voyager Group.
2. The cause of injury was against the law. - Yes, clearly as the DoC has had to commandeer Voyager Group.
   
3. Remedy is applicable under relevant law that can be granted by a favorable decision. - Maybe, but not clearly yes. By bringing this case and requesting an emergency injunction, the Plaintiff is actually causing more injury to themselves as they are now delaying the DoC from liquidating and granting relief where they can. It is also not clear if the Plaintiff would be successful or not in this case, and even if found successful, there is no guarantee that the relief given would be greater than that given by the DoC operations.

II. General Case Filing Issues
This court finds issues with the way that the Plaintiff phrased their Claims for Relief. Only the DoJ has the power to charge for criminal activity, and it is clear in this situation that the plaintiff is asking the court to charge Voyager Group as a criminal given the language used.

Citizens are able to get relief civilly from criminal actions, but they should not try to charge others in any such manner. The Plaintiff may have meant to get relief civilly for criminal actions, but the way they are phrasing this in their complaint reads like a criminal charge that should be left to the DoJ.

The Federal Court thanks all involved. This case is now dismissed. The Emergency Injunction is lifted.