Lawsuit: Pending Cyanroy v. ZxRiptide [2026] DCR 147

Cyanroy

Cyanroy

Citizen
Cyanroy
Cyanroy
Armourer
Joined
Jun 15, 2026
Messages
34

Case Filing



IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Cyanroy
Plaintiff

v.

ZxRiptide
Defendant

COMPLAINT

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I was in Spawn, advertising for someone, when the defendant approached me and said the following things, which are demonstrated in P-001. After that he Made the statement as seen in P-002, Saying he will pay $10,000 for a video of me apologizing.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES

1. Cyanroy

2. ZxRiptide


II. FACTS

  1. On the date of 16 of August 2026, as shown in the Plaintiff's evidence, the Defendant engaged in conduct directed toward the Plaintiff which forms the basis of this action.
  2. The Defendant made statements and communications concerning the Plaintiff that were visible or accessible to other members of the servers.
  3. The conduct was specifically directed toward the Plaintiff and was not merely a general disagreement or unrelated conversation.
  4. The Defendant's conduct continued in circumstances where the Plaintiff was clearly the subject of the discussion and was affected by what was being said and done.
  5. The Defendant subsequently made or participated in a monetary offer of $10,000 relating to conduct directed toward the Plaintiff, as documented in Exhibit P-002.
  6. The $10,000 offer was not an isolated financial transaction unrelated to the Plaintiff. It specifically concerned conduct directed toward the Plaintiff and therefore forms a material part of the circumstances giving rise to this action.
  7. The communications and conduct shown in the Plaintiff's evidence demonstrate a continuing dispute involving the Plaintiff, rather than a single isolated statement or disagreement.
  8. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff suffered fear, humiliation, emotional distress, and harm to their reputation and standing within the community.
  9. The Plaintiff has submitted the relevant communications and other evidence to establish the circumstances of the Defendant's conduct, including Exhibit P-002 and the communications surrounding the incident.
  10. The Plaintiff brings this action seeking compensation for the harm suffered, damages relating to the conduct documented in P-002, punitive damages, and any other relief the Court considers appropriate.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Claims for Relief

At the time of this lawsuit being made, the Plaintiff was named Cyanfounder
Count 1 - Defamation

Under Part V, Section 1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits defamation when they make a false or defamatory statement concerning another person that harms, or is reasonably capable of harming, that person's reputation.

The Defendant's conduct satisfies the relevant elements, such as:

  1. The Defendant made statements and communications concerning the Plaintiff that were presented in a manner capable of damaging the Plaintiff's reputation and standing within the Redmont community.
  2. The statements were communicated to persons other than the Plaintiff through Discord and/or in-game communications.
  3. The statements and surrounding conduct concerned the Plaintiff personally and were capable of exposing the Plaintiff to reputational harm, ridicule, or loss of standing within the community.
  4. The Defendant's conduct was directed toward the Plaintiff and was not merely an unrelated private disagreement. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff demonstrates that the conduct occurred in a broader context involving the Plaintiff specifically.
  5. The Plaintiff submits that the statements were not substantially true, were not merely genuinely held opinions based upon disclosed facts, and were not protected legitimate political communication.
  6. The Plaintiff therefore requests appropriate relief for the reputational harm caused by the Defendant's conduct, including $10,000 in damages.
Count 2 - Malicious Allegation

Under Part XIII, Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits a malicious allegation if they make a false allegation that another person committed a crime or civil violation, knew or could reasonably infer that the allegation was false, and the allegation causes harm to the accused person's reputation, livelihood, or wellbeing.

The Defendant's conduct satisfies the relevant elements, such as:

  1. The Defendant made allegations concerning the Plaintiff that portrayed the Plaintiff as having engaged in improper or unlawful conduct.
  2. The allegations were communicated to other members of the Redmont community rather than being confined to a private communication with the Plaintiff.
  3. The Defendant's conduct caused, or was reasonably capable of causing, harm to the Plaintiff's reputation and wellbeing.
  4. The circumstances surrounding the Defendant's conduct demonstrate that the allegations were made despite circumstances from which the Defendant could reasonably have inferred that the allegations were false or unsupported.
  5. The allegations were not made in good faith to the appropriate authorities for investigation, but were instead communicated in circumstances capable of causing reputational harm to the Plaintiff.
  6. The Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court find the Defendant liable for malicious allegation and grant the appropriate remedies available under the Civil Code.
Count 3 - Consequential Damages

Under Part III, Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, consequential damages may be awarded for otherwise incalculable harm, including humiliation and loss of enjoyment.

The Plaintiff's claim satisfies the relevant requirements, such as:

  1. The Defendant's conduct caused the Plaintiff to experience fear, humiliation, distress, and other personal consequences arising from the circumstances of the conduct.
  2. The Plaintiff's reaction and the circumstances documented in the submitted evidence demonstrate that the conduct had a genuine personal impact beyond a simple disagreement between the parties.
  3. A reasonable person placed in substantially similar circumstances could experience comparable humiliation, distress, or loss of enjoyment.
  4. The Plaintiff therefore requests $30,000 in consequential damages, including damages for humiliation and associated emotional harm.
Count 4 - Conduct Relating to P-002

The Plaintiff incorporates Exhibit P-002 and the facts demonstrated therein into this Count.

  1. Exhibit P-002 documents a $10,000 monetary offer relating to conduct directed toward the Plaintiff.
  2. The monetary offer demonstrates that financial consideration was being associated with conduct concerning the Plaintiff.
  3. The Plaintiff submits that the offer, when considered together with the surrounding communications and other evidence, demonstrates the seriousness and deliberate nature of the conduct directed toward the Plaintiff.
  4. The Plaintiff requests that the Court consider P-002 as evidence of the Defendant's conduct and its effect upon the Plaintiff when determining the appropriate remedy.
  5. The Plaintiff therefore requests $10,000 in damages relating to the conduct documented in P-002.
Count 5 - Punitive Damages

Under Part III, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, punitive damages may be awarded to punish outrageous conduct and deter similar conduct in the future. The Code recognizes conduct involving an intent to cause harm, knowledge that conduct is likely to harm another person, reckless indifference, dishonesty or bad faith, and persistent or repeated misconduct.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Award $10,000 in compensatory damages for emotional distress and defamation.
2. Award $10,000 in damages relating to the $10,000 monetary offer made against the Plaintiff, as evidenced by Exhibit P-002.
3. Award $15,000 in punitive damages due to the Defendant's intentional and malicious conduct.
4. Any additional relief that this Court deems just, proper, and appropriate.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18 day of August 2026

Screenshot 2026-08-16 185025.png
Screenshot 2026-08-16 183927.png

 
Last edited:
The Plaintiff’s name has been edited because it was changed in-game.
 
Hello sorry for the late response. I was in a rural area with no cellphone connection. I will continue my trip the next week until wednesday (we are at a hotel with wifi rn). May I do it later?
 
Cyanroy said:

Case Filing



IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Cyanroy
Plaintiff

v.

ZxRiptide
Defendant

COMPLAINT

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES

1. Cyanroy

2. ZxRiptide


II. FACTS

  1. On the date of 16 of August 2026, as shown in the Plaintiff's evidence, the Defendant engaged in conduct directed toward the Plaintiff which forms the basis of this action.
  2. The Defendant made statements and communications concerning the Plaintiff that were visible or accessible to other members of the servers.
  3. The conduct was specifically directed toward the Plaintiff and was not merely a general disagreement or unrelated conversation.
  4. The Defendant's conduct continued in circumstances where the Plaintiff was clearly the subject of the discussion and was affected by what was being said and done.
  5. The Defendant subsequently made or participated in a monetary offer of $10,000 relating to conduct directed toward the Plaintiff, as documented in Exhibit P-002.
  6. The $10,000 offer was not an isolated financial transaction unrelated to the Plaintiff. It specifically concerned conduct directed toward the Plaintiff and therefore forms a material part of the circumstances giving rise to this action.
  7. The communications and conduct shown in the Plaintiff's evidence demonstrate a continuing dispute involving the Plaintiff, rather than a single isolated statement or disagreement.
  8. As a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff suffered fear, humiliation, emotional distress, and harm to their reputation and standing within the community.
  9. The Plaintiff has submitted the relevant communications and other evidence to establish the circumstances of the Defendant's conduct, including Exhibit P-002 and the communications surrounding the incident.
  10. The Plaintiff brings this action seeking compensation for the harm suffered, damages relating to the conduct documented in P-002, punitive damages, and any other relief the Court considers appropriate.


III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Claims for Relief

At the time of this lawsuit being made, the Plaintiff was named Cyanfounder
Count 1 - Defamation

Under Part V, Section 1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits defamation when they make a false or defamatory statement concerning another person that harms, or is reasonably capable of harming, that person's reputation.

The Defendant's conduct satisfies the relevant elements, such as:

  1. The Defendant made statements and communications concerning the Plaintiff that were presented in a manner capable of damaging the Plaintiff's reputation and standing within the Redmont community.
  2. The statements were communicated to persons other than the Plaintiff through Discord and/or in-game communications.
  3. The statements and surrounding conduct concerned the Plaintiff personally and were capable of exposing the Plaintiff to reputational harm, ridicule, or loss of standing within the community.
  4. The Defendant's conduct was directed toward the Plaintiff and was not merely an unrelated private disagreement. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff demonstrates that the conduct occurred in a broader context involving the Plaintiff specifically.
  5. The Plaintiff submits that the statements were not substantially true, were not merely genuinely held opinions based upon disclosed facts, and were not protected legitimate political communication.
  6. The Plaintiff therefore requests appropriate relief for the reputational harm caused by the Defendant's conduct, including $10,000 in damages.
Count 2 - Malicious Allegation

Under Part XIII, Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, a person commits a malicious allegation if they make a false allegation that another person committed a crime or civil violation, knew or could reasonably infer that the allegation was false, and the allegation causes harm to the accused person's reputation, livelihood, or wellbeing.

The Defendant's conduct satisfies the relevant elements, such as:

  1. The Defendant made allegations concerning the Plaintiff that portrayed the Plaintiff as having engaged in improper or unlawful conduct.
  2. The allegations were communicated to other members of the Redmont community rather than being confined to a private communication with the Plaintiff.
  3. The Defendant's conduct caused, or was reasonably capable of causing, harm to the Plaintiff's reputation and wellbeing.
  4. The circumstances surrounding the Defendant's conduct demonstrate that the allegations were made despite circumstances from which the Defendant could reasonably have inferred that the allegations were false or unsupported.
  5. The allegations were not made in good faith to the appropriate authorities for investigation, but were instead communicated in circumstances capable of causing reputational harm to the Plaintiff.
  6. The Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court find the Defendant liable for malicious allegation and grant the appropriate remedies available under the Civil Code.
Count 3 - Consequential Damages

Under Part III, Section 5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, consequential damages may be awarded for otherwise incalculable harm, including humiliation and loss of enjoyment.

The Plaintiff's claim satisfies the relevant requirements, such as:

  1. The Defendant's conduct caused the Plaintiff to experience fear, humiliation, distress, and other personal consequences arising from the circumstances of the conduct.
  2. The Plaintiff's reaction and the circumstances documented in the submitted evidence demonstrate that the conduct had a genuine personal impact beyond a simple disagreement between the parties.
  3. A reasonable person placed in substantially similar circumstances could experience comparable humiliation, distress, or loss of enjoyment.
  4. The Plaintiff therefore requests $30,000 in consequential damages, including damages for humiliation and associated emotional harm.
Count 4 - Conduct Relating to P-002

The Plaintiff incorporates Exhibit P-002 and the facts demonstrated therein into this Count.

  1. Exhibit P-002 documents a $10,000 monetary offer relating to conduct directed toward the Plaintiff.
  2. The monetary offer demonstrates that financial consideration was being associated with conduct concerning the Plaintiff.
  3. The Plaintiff submits that the offer, when considered together with the surrounding communications and other evidence, demonstrates the seriousness and deliberate nature of the conduct directed toward the Plaintiff.
  4. The Plaintiff requests that the Court consider P-002 as evidence of the Defendant's conduct and its effect upon the Plaintiff when determining the appropriate remedy.
  5. The Plaintiff therefore requests $10,000 in damages relating to the conduct documented in P-002.
Count 5 - Punitive Damages

Under Part III, Section 3 of the Redmont Civil Code Act, punitive damages may be awarded to punish outrageous conduct and deter similar conduct in the future. The Code recognizes conduct involving an intent to cause harm, knowledge that conduct is likely to harm another person, reckless indifference, dishonesty or bad faith, and persistent or repeated misconduct.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Award $10,000 in compensatory damages for emotional distress and defamation.
2. Award $10,000 in damages relating to the $10,000 monetary offer made against the Plaintiff, as evidenced by Exhibit P-002.
3. Award $15,000 in punitive damages due to the Defendant's intentional and malicious conduct.
4. Any additional relief that this Court deems just, proper, and appropriate.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18 day of August 2026

View attachment 95650
View attachment 95651

Click to expand...

I don't understand what you're alleging. Are you suing because he said P-002 in a public forum or because of something else? You keep making references to continued disputes, but I only see 2 images of chat logs.
 

Writ of Summons



@ZxRiptide is commanded to appear in the District Court in the case of Cyanroy v. Zxriptide [2026] DCR 147

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Present on behalf of the Defendant, your honor. Theory, Talion & Partners shall be Defense Council.

1787696446301.png
 
Your honor,

The Defense would like to humbly request a 48 hour extension, as there have been issues with consulting with our client in order to file the answer to complaint which are outside of our control.

Rendered void.
 
Last edited:

Answer to Complaint


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Cyanroy
Plaintiff

v.

ZxRiptide (represented by Theory, Talion & Partners Inc.)
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that on the date of 16 of August 2026, as shown in the Plaintiff's evidence, the Defendant engaged in conduct directed toward the Plaintiff which forms the basis of this action.

2. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that the Defendant made statements and communications concerning the Plaintiff that were visible or accessible to other members of the servers.

3. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that the conduct was specifically directed toward the Plaintiff and was not merely a general disagreement or unrelated conversation." The Defense will not contest this point.

4. The Defense DENIES that the Defendant's conduct continued in circumstances where the Plaintiff was clearly the subject of the discussion and was affected by what was being said and done.

5. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that the Defendant subsequently made or participated in a monetary offer of $10,000 relating to conduct directed toward the Plaintiff, as documented in Exhibit P-002.

6. The Defense DENIES that the $10,000 offer was not an isolated financial transaction unrelated to the Plaintiff. It specifically concerned conduct directed toward the Plaintiff and therefore forms a material part of the circumstances giving rise to this action.

7. The Defense DENIES that the communications and conduct shown in the Plaintiff's evidence demonstrate a continuing dispute involving the Plaintiff, rather than a single isolated statement or disagreement.

8. The Defense DENIES that, as a result of the Defendant's conduct, the Plaintiff suffered fear, humiliation, emotional distress, and harm to their reputation and standing within the community.

9. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that the Plaintiff has submitted the relevant communications and other evidence to establish the circumstances of the Defendant's conduct, including Exhibit P-002 and the communications surrounding the incident.

10. The Defense DOES NOT CONTEST that the Plaintiff brings this action seeking compensation for the harm suffered, damages relating to the conduct documented in P-002, punitive damages, and any other relief the Court considers appropriate.

II. DEFENCES
1. The Plaintiff has presented no evidence establishing that they suffered any cognizable harm or injury under the law. In particular, neither humiliation or reputational harm is evidenced by P-001 or P-002, which, to date, constitute the entirety of the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff.

2. The message referenced by the Plaintiff does not identify the conduct or circumstances for which the Plaintiff is allegedly expected to apologize. The Plaintiff has failed to present any arguments or evidence which connect P-002 to the exchange had in P-001.

3. Part V, §1 of the Redmont Civil Code Act defines Defamation as:

“A person commits a violation if the person: (a) makes a false statement and/or communication that injures a third party’s reputation; (b) the statement is made to at least one person other than the plaintiff; and (c) the statement is presented as fact rather than opinion.”
Click to expand...
The evidence presented by the Plaintiff fails to establish the existence of a statement or communication that injured any person’s reputation and therefore fails to establish the first element necessary to constitute Defamation. With respect to subsection (b), P-001 is a private communication directed to the Plaintiff. Given that the statements, which the Plaintiff alleges were defamatory, were made by the Defendant using /murmur, unless other evidence proves otherwise, it is reasonable to assume that no one other than the Plaintiff and the Defendant saw the communication at issue in this case, failing the requirement set out by subsection (b). On the evidence presently before the Court, P-002 could likewise be interpreted as a joke, particularly in light of the phrase “in RP obviously” contained within the advertisement.

4. The Claim of Malicious Allegation is without merit. Part XIII, §5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act defines Malicious Allegation as occurring when one “makes a false allegation that another person committed a crime or civil violation.” Neither P-001 nor P-002 contains an allegation that the Plaintiff committed a crime or civil violation. The complete absence of such an allegation therefore prevents the Plaintiff from establishing any of the elements necessary to sustain a claim for Malicious Allegation under Part XIII, §5, and should therefore be ignored.

5. The Plaintiff cites Part III, §5 of the Redmont Civil Code Act when arguing for Consequential Damages. The Plaintiff has failed to provide any evidence regarding any humiliation, loss of enjoyment, or worsening of conditions that resulted from the Defendant’s conduct. Their complete failure to state any particular ways in which the Defendant’s conduct resulted in any sort of consequential harm makes their argument entirely unconvincing.

6. The Plaintiff appears to seek $10,000 in damages in connection with the conduct documented in P-002. However, the Defense submits that such an amount is not the remedy prescribed for any civil violation allegedly committed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff appears to have proceeded on the assumption that they are entitled to determine the appropriate remedy for an alleged injury, notwithstanding that the applicable law establishes which remedies correspond to particular forms of injury. Moreover, this issue is premature given that the Plaintiff has not, in the first instance, established the existence of an actionable injury.

7. The Plaintiff cites Part III, §3 of the Civil Code Act, which provides:
(a) Punitive damages are damages awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct and to deter them and others like them from similar conduct in the future.
Click to expand...
The Plaintiff has stated that punitive damages can be awarded, and yet has failed to make any arguments as to how the Defendant’s conduct was in any way outrageous. This claim should be entirely ignored.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 27th day of July 2026.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top