Lawsuit: Adjourned Crown Casino v. ultrapvpnoob [2022] DCR 43

[dygyee]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


dygyee
Plaintiff

v.

ultrapvpnoob
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
Right after dygyee posted an advertisement for his casino, named Crown Casino, ultrapvpnoob says in general chat: "dygyee, your casino is a scam." This slander potentially deterred possible customers from gambling/playing card games at Crown casino.


I. PARTIES
1. dygyee (Owner of Crown Casino)
2. ultrapvpnoob

II. FACTS
1. On September 10th, dygyee posted an advertisement for his casino for people to play poker at Crown Casino located at CBD035.
2. Aezal had already showed up and we were waiting for more people to play poker when ultrapvpnoob stated in general chat that dygyee's casino was a scam.
3. After ultrapvpnoobs public statement, no one else showed up to dygyee's casino.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant, ultrapvpnoob, slandered dygyee's casino and potentially deterred customers from gambling. (Slander: Law 17.8)


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $1,000 for slander
2. $250 for legal fees

Exhibit 1: Proof of ultrapvpnoob's statement in general chat.

Witnesses:
Aezal

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 10th day of September 2022

 

[Aladeen]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS


@ultrapvpnoob is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Crown Casino v. ultrapvpnoob [2022] DCR 43. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[ultrapvpnoob]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Dygyee
Plaintiff

v.

ultrapvpnoob
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. No disputes
2. No disputes
3. No disputes

II. DEFENCES
1. While the claims the Plaintiff is making is undisputed, their conclusion is. If you recall the definition of slander, it is a *false* statement that defames a player's reputation. In this case, the claims weren't false. While the word "scam"'s definition is debatable, my next statement after that isn't. After I said the casino was a scam, i said that "i lost like 1k there"(see evidence 1). I did infact go to Crown Casino one time and in that one time I lost close to 1000$. If my damaging statement was based on true information, then it is not slander and is just a simple statement of fact.


Evidence 1

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 10/9/2022

 

[Aladeen]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
VERDICT
Crown Casino v. ultrapvpnoob [2022] DCR 43

I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION
1. The Defendant slandered the plaintiff's business by saying it was a scam.

II. DEFENDANT'S POSITION
1. The Defendant did not dispute the facts,

III. THE COURT OPINION
1. Slander is defined as ''A purposeful false statement of a player to cause damage to that player's reputation.'' the defendant made the statement that the plaintiff casino was a scam given how they had lost 1k in gambling. However, one of the definitions of gambling is ''take risky action in the hope of a desired result.'' the defendant left all to luck in hope of getting the result they desired while gambling at the plaintiff's casino.

IV. DECISION
1. I am ruling in favor of the Plaintiff and I hereby order the Department of Justice to fine the Defendant $1000 and to transfer that money into the plaintiff's balance.

The District Court thanks all involved.