Appeal: Denied Commonwealth v. Commonwealth | SCR Case No Docket Number - Appeal

[Dartanboy]

Username: Dartanboy

I am representing myself

What Case are you Appealing?: Commonwealth v. Commonwealth | SCR Case No Docket Number

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Dismissed - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

Basis for Appeal: Your honors,

This case was dismissed without a full analysis of the situation. This issue cannot be resolved internally, because only the Judiciary is tasked with interpreting the law - not the Department of Justice. We are asking the Supreme Court to decide whether our policy is legal (a Judicial power).

This is a Government dispute, which the Constitution gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over.

We ask the case be heard and the Frivolous Case charge removed.

-- Edit --
As deciding whether a certain policy is legal is, in fact, a Judicial Power (not Executive Power), allowing this case to be dismissed would set the immensely dangerous precedent that the Department of Justice, and perhaps the entire Executive, has Judicial Power.

I am asking you, your honors, not to set such a dangerous precedent.

Supporting Evidence:

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honors, I accidentally clicked "I am representing myself" but I am representing the Commonwealth.

 

[Aladeen]

The Supreme Court has decided to maintain its original decision to decline hearing this case. We believe this can be handled internally by the Department. However, we remove the frivolous charge.