Novakerbal
Citizen
Supporter
Justice Department
Health Department
Statesman
NovaKerbal
State Prosecutor
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2025
- Messages
- 98
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff
v.
Yeet_Boy
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Yeet_Boy (Defendant)
2. Commonwealth of Redmont (Plaintiff)
II. FACTS
1. On November 17th, 2025, Talion77(in their capacity as Oakridge Head of Residence) created a DCT ticket to request the eviction of or-brewery (P-001).
2. During the aforementioned ticket, Yeet_Boy (in their capacity as Mayor) discouraged the creation of similar tickets, and claimed to have their own methods of transferring plots that bypassed the DCT (P-002) (P-003).
3. Search warrants actioned by the Commonwealth revealed that staff had transferred the plot from the previous owner(Bardiya_King) to Yeet_Boy upon the request of the latter. (P-004), (P-005), (P-006), (P-007), (P-008).
4. ElysiaCrynn(in their capacity as a member of Server Staff) asked Yeet_Boy to verify the legality of the transfer they were requesting, which Yeet_Boy subsequently claimed to be legitimate (P-008).
5. At the time of the actions undertaken by Yeet_Boy, Oakridge derived all jurisdiction from Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights.
6. § 5.2 of Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights states: "Evictions and transfers of property within Town limits (Facilitated by Town government, actioned by the DCT);".
7. The Preamble of the Oakridge Town Constitution lists eviction jurisdiction in the Town as "Department of Construction and Transportation to action evictions".
8. Article II, § (e)(4) of the Oakridge Town Constitution states that the Office of Residence is responsible for "Management of evicted plot auctions within Oakridge".
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant, Yeet_Boy, knowingly or negligently violated both the Oakridge Town Constitution, as well as Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights, by directly petitioning staff to transfer the plot to him, rather than going through lawful DCT Channels.
2. The Defendant was asked to verify that the actions would be legal, and affirmed that to be the case. As the elected mayor of Oakridge, Yeet_Boy is well aware of the Town Constitution and the Executive Order responsible for giving it any degree of autonomy. Therefore Yeet_Boy knowingly acted in violation of established Federal and local policy, such actions must be prevented from occurring.
3. While the Redmontian Constitution has since been amended under the Town Rights Expansion Act, the actions still occurred under prior frameworks where it was a violation of Executive Order. Furthermore, as newly established in Part V 32. (3) towns are explicitly given jurisdiction over "land use, zoning, building standards, and property administration;". This clause is equivalent with a prior clause present in Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights which states: "Land use, zoning, plot pricing, building regulations, and building standards;". Notably however, Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights explicitly carves out the handling of evictions under a separate section, specifically clarifying that evictions will be facilitated by the Town government and actioned by the DCT. As no such constitution clause exists that explicitly delegates the facilitation or actioning of any evictions to any Town jurisdiction, it remains within the jurisdiction of the DCT. Therefore a permanent injunction is necessary to prevent any further abuses of any Constitution, Town or Redmontian.
4. The DCT suffered harm to its lawfully mandated authority to action evictions, by bypassing this jurisdiction Yeet_Boy undermined the authority of the DCT. A local government leader took direct action to undermine the lawful authority of a Federal Department, something which runs directly counter to Executive Order 46/25 - Town's Rights, the legal framework at the time of the actions undertaken by the Defendant.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A declaratory judgement that the actions undertaken by Mayor Yeet_Boy were illegal.
2. A permanent injunction preventing all current and future Mayors and other members of any Town Council from actioning the eviction of plots within their jurisdiction through methods inconsistent with the Constitution of Redmont or the respective town Constitution.
Evidence List:
See Attached PDF P-004 (2)
See Attached PDF P-005
Witness List:
1. Talion77 (Former Oakridge Head of Residence)
2. Staff
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 23rd day of February, 2026
