Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. Vendeka Inc. [2026] FCR 16

S

Superwoops

Citizen
Public Defender
Oakridge Resident
Justice Department
5th Anniversary Change Maker Popular in the Polls Contemptable
Superwoops
Superwoops
Public Defender
Joined
Jan 3, 2025
Messages
257

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Vendeka Inc.
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The auditing firm Vendeka consistently and deliberately approved monthly public reports for the publicly-traded firm Royal Dragon & Shell (RDS). In doing so, key issues were overlooked, such as the fact that RDS was never an incorporated entity, the approval of an abnormally high CRP-DC exchange rate, and a reliance on illiquid assets outside the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Redmont. This created a misleading impression of RDS's true financial health for investors.


I. PARTIES
Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
Vendeka Inc. (Defendant)
EmmDubz (CEO of Vendeka Inc.)


II. FACTS
1. RoyalDragon&Shell and RDS are two sole proprietorships owned by Luke201556 with a combined balance of $0. (P-001, P-002)
2. Royal Dragon and Shell was a publicly-traded security from August 11th, 2025, to January 11th, 2026, on the National Exchange of Redmont with 2,000,000 shares issued. (P-003, P-004, P-005)
3. Royal Dragon & Shell is not, and was never, an incorporated entity.
4. Sole proprietorships are owned by one person.
5. The then-active Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act did not allow for sole proprietorships to issue shares.
6. On September 21st, 2025, a document titled "The Royal Dragon & Shell LLC Ownership Structure" was accompanied by a Vendeka audit report. (P-003, P-007, P-009)
7. On November 7th, 2025, Vendeka audited RDS once again. (P-003)
8. During the month of October 2025, RDS reported total assets of $17,576,779.20 DC. (P-006)
9. The aforementioned number relies on a 1:10 exchange rate between $CRP and $DC. The original reported amount, and original valuation in $CRP, was 1,757,677.92. (P-006)
10. Vendeka approved the 1:10 exchange rate by stating "Conversion rate from CRP$ to DC$ is taken as $10 (Market Rate)" in its audit report. (P-007)
11. In the same report, Vendeka states that "Since the Company is based in CityRP majority of its assets are located/present in CRP. [...] Cash and Bank Balances: RDS Holds only 7.85% of their cash in hand in DC and remaining Cash is held in CRP. [...] Valuation of investment is found to be appropriately valued and disclosed." (P-007)
12. The real exchange rate between $CRP and $DC is lower than 1:10.
13. The Azalea Isles (CityRP) are not recognised by Redmont.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:

1. 2 counts of Falsification of an Audit Report: Vendeka knowingly reported that most of RDS's assets are held in an unrecognised nation, and therefore cannot be reflected in Redmont without the risk of committing unrecognised foreign exchange, a risk that should have been communicated to investors since these foreign assets are illiquid in Redmont. Furthermore, the audit reports affirmed the proposed 1:10 exchange rate with no evidence to support it, therefore misleading investors as to the real value of RDS’s CRP assets in Redmont. Finally, Vendeka reported on a public company that was not incorporated. Vendeka, as an institution that has conducted a number of audit reports for other public companies, is expected to know that only incorporated entities may issue shares and be listed on an exchange. Additionally, Vendeka signed off on a report recognising RDS as an LLC, which is false. The assets of RDS are therefore also the assets of Luke201556, the manager of RDS, something that was also unknown to investors and not flagged by the auditor. RDS was audited twice, on September 21st and on November 7th, therefore two counts are warranted.
2. 2 counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation: Vendeka signed off on the firm’s listing of foreign assets as assets in Redmont using a 1:10 exchange rate on September 21st and on November 7th. This greatly inflated the true value of Royal Dragon & Shell in Redmont from not even close to $1,000,000, all the way up to over $17,000,000. By not reporting a problem with this, and showcasing audited status on the RDS page in the National Exchange of Redmont, Vendeka aided RDS in committing Market Manipulation.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. 400 Penalty Units and a suspension of the ability of Vendeka to issue audit reports for one month for two counts of Falsification of an Audit Report.
2. 200 Penalty Units and 20 minutes imprisonment for two counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation.

V. WITNESSES
1. ElysiaCrynn (DOC Secretary)
2. DonTrillions (FRB Governor)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 3rd day of March 2026.

​

EVIDENCE:

P-001.png
P-002.png
P-004.png
P-005.png
SEE PDF.
SEE PDF.
P-008.png
SEE PDF.
 

Attachments

Writ of Summons


@EmmDubz, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Vendeka Inc. [2026] FCR 16

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Vendeka Inc.
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. To two counts of Falsification of an Audit Report, Not Guilty.
2. To two counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation, Not Guilty.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 6th day of March, 2026.

 
ko531 said:
We will now enter Discovery. Discovery will last until March 10th at 7:16pm CST unless both sides agree to conclude discovery early
Click to expand...
Could the Defence kindly ask for an extension to this discovery, as that sits within a time window in which I'm in exams, if i could ask for it to be moved further to the 12th at the earliest, I would be immensely grateful.
 
The Prosecution submits the following evidence:

1773089064374.png

Let it be known that the above image has been partially redacted as much of the information contained within is classified. The message shown has been reclassified as PUBLIC by the Acting Attorney General.
 
The Defence calls the following witnesses:

- Omegabiebel
- Stoppers
- MegaMinerM
- Coshjlose

Additionally, the Defence submits the following evidence:

Full RDS TIcket

1773265626504.png
 
Superwoops said:
Your honour,
The Commonwealth requests an extension until next Thursday midnight to submit its opening statement.
The DOJ has very few active prosecutors and I am currently on leave. In order to preserve justice I humbly ask this Court to grant this extension.
Click to expand...
Granted
 

Opening Statement


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your honour,
The Prosecution will prove in this case that Vendeka Inc. has not only aided Royal Dragon & Shell in committing Market Manipulation and in turn themselves committing Third-Party Misrepresentation, but they have also falsified two audit reports.

Falsification of an Audit Report is committed when someone "Knowingly issues an audit report that presents a false or misleading impression of a company’s financial condition or its compliance with applicable financial law." Vendeka audited the NER-listed security with the ticker “RDS” on two separate instances. Audit reports serve as a way for investors to rest easy knowing that a publicly traded company’s accounts have been reviewed by an external, impartial accountant. (Act of Congress - Commercial Standards Act, Section 13)

The DOJ treads lightly when addressing the word knowingly. The Commonwealth proposes the following interpretation:
Let us remember that Courts must apply a plain reading of the law (Lawsuit: Adjourned - Inknet v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 86). In doing so, we find that the clause doesn’t really convey that knowingly refers to knowing the auditor’s conduct would present a false or misleading impression of a company’s financial condition or its compliance with applicable financial law. Because the word knowingly is placed at the very beggining of the sentence, it sets out a two part test to the offense:

a) The defendant knowingly submitted an audit report.
b) The audit report presented a false or misleading impression of a company’s financial condition or its compliance with applicable financial law.

The word knowingly therefore means purposefully, deliberately. (The auditor meant to publish the audit report). This interpretation is the most plain reading of the law. It is not possible to assume the first interpretation as the only correct one; doing so would assert that Congress meant to include an element of *mens rea* in proving malice when publishing the audit report.

With this two-part test met, we can accurately find that Vendeka Inc. knowingly submitted an audit report, and the report presented two issues affecting its apparent financial condition, (reliance on foreign assets, and an arbitrary 1:10 exchange rate) and one issue affecting its compliance with relevant law (its status of non-incorporation and subsequent legal inability to issue shares). It has therefore committed two counts of Falsification of an Audit Report.

If the Court is unwilling to accept this interpretation, however, let us assume that knowingly relates to an auditor submitting an audit report in full knowledge that it presents a false or misleading impression of a company’s financial condition or its compliance with applicable financial law. In such a case, the Prosecution argues that Vendeka knew of RDS’s assets being primarily located outside the bounds of the Commonwealth. This can be proven by taking a look at P-007, which states that “Since the Company is based in CityRP majority of its assets are located/present in CRP […] RDS Holds only 7.85% of their cash in hand in DC and remaining Cash is held in CRP.” It is impossible to reflect assets stemming from an unrecognised nation because those assets cannot be controlled from Redmont. For example, if a shareholder sues RDS in Court and the Court, for whatever reason, sides with the Plaintiff, the Court has no way of enforcing its judgement (that is, lawfully collecting the assets held in the unrecognised nation).
The Prosecution also argues that Vendeka, in certifying a Market Rate without a shred of supporting evidence, in a magnitude where it is impossible to do so not in knowledge that the rate was arbitrary, and in a situation where doing so materially affects the valuation of a public company, also committed this crime. This will be further corroborated by witness testimony by the Secretary of the Department of Commerce and the then-Governor of the Federal Reserve of Redmont.

On Third-Party Misrepresentation, we find that it is committed when someone “(a) aids or abets a party or entity in committing market manipulation, including unknowingly participating in a pump and dump scheme.” The Prosecution emphasises the word unknowingly, as this offense does not require the element of mens rea in knowing that the defendant’s actions were aiding a third party in committing market manipulation. With this set, it is clear that, by not raising any alarm as to the three issues presented above, and instead providing the status of audited, Vendeka aided Royal Dragon & Shell in inflating its value on the National Exchange of Redmont.

For the reasons presented above, the Commonwealth asks this Court to find Vendeka, Inc. guilty on all counts.​

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top