Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Savannah212467 [2026] FCR 3

[AmityBlamity]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

V.

.Savannah212467
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

Savannah212467 disclosed private discussions concerning legal matters between herself and her lawfirm, and 12700k, breaching attorney-client privilege.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. .Savannah212467 (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. .Savannah212467 is the Founder and Managing Partner at Iustita Law. (P-002)
2. .Savannah212467 holds the Solicitor legal qualification, as well as Barrister legal qualifications in Constitutional Law and Property (P-001).
3. On the 31st of December, 2025, 12700k opened a ticket (#service-ticket-ftlceo) with Lustia Law to inquire about “employee poaching laws”. (P-003a to P-003k)
4. Shortly after opening the ticket, 12700k asked if attorney-client privilege was in effect.
5. Savannah responded, “Attorney client privilege? Ya”(P-003b).
6. On the 1st of January, 2026, .Savannah21247 posted screenshots taken from #service-ticket-ftlceo in the public #Legal channel on the DemocracyCraft server. (P-004a-d, P-005)
7. On the 1st of January, 2026, Investigator Rookieblue14 sent a private DM to 12700k, asking if he gave written consent to .Savannah212467 or anyone from Iustitia Law to disclose information from the ticket. 12700k confirmed he didn’t. (P-006).
8. As of the 17th of January, 2026, the material remains posted within #Legal.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charge against the Defendant:

• One count of Breaking Attorney-Client Privilege under §VIII(4)(d), committed when a person “discloses discussions of a client without their written permission.” Not only did the Defendant breach Attorney-Client Privilege after assuring their client it was in effect, they did so publicly in one of Redmont’s most trafficked channels.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

• 200 Penalty units, 20 minutes of imprisonment, and disbarment for one month.

Spoiler: P-001: Qualifications

Spoiler: P-002: Savannah’s Discord Roles

Spoiler: P-003a-P-003k: The entirety of 12700k’s ticket with Iustita Law.

Spoiler: P-004a-d: Savannah’s message in #Legal, as well as the shared screenshots.

Spoiler: P-005: Savannah’s follow-up message.

Spoiler: P-006: 12700k confirming he didn’t give permission.

Witnesses:
12700k
RookieBlue

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATE: This 17th day of January, 2026

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your Honour, per Rule 3.3, I shall be amending the facts of the criminal complaint as such:

1. .Savannah212467 is the Founder and Managing Partner at Iustita Law. (P-001) (P-002)
2. .Savannah212467 holds the Solicitor legal qualification, as well as Barrister legal qualifications in Constitutional Law and Property (P-002). (P-001).

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Savannah, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Savannah212467 [2026] FCR 3

ALL PARTIES, please review the new Regulations of the Federal Court!

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.