Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Savannah212467 [2026] FCR 3

[AmityBlamity]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

V.

.Savannah212467
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

Savannah212467 disclosed private discussions concerning legal matters between herself and her lawfirm, and 12700k, breaching attorney-client privilege.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. .Savannah212467 (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. .Savannah212467 is the Founder and Managing Partner at Iustita Law. (P-002)
2. .Savannah212467 holds the Solicitor legal qualification, as well as Barrister legal qualifications in Constitutional Law and Property (P-001).
3. On the 31st of December, 2025, 12700k opened a ticket (#service-ticket-ftlceo) with Lustia Law to inquire about “employee poaching laws”. (P-003a to P-003k)
4. Shortly after opening the ticket, 12700k asked if attorney-client privilege was in effect.
5. Savannah responded, “Attorney client privilege? Ya”(P-003b).
6. On the 1st of January, 2026, .Savannah21247 posted screenshots taken from #service-ticket-ftlceo in the public #Legal channel on the DemocracyCraft server. (P-004a-d, P-005)
7. On the 1st of January, 2026, Investigator Rookieblue14 sent a private DM to 12700k, asking if he gave written consent to .Savannah212467 or anyone from Iustitia Law to disclose information from the ticket. 12700k confirmed he didn’t. (P-006).
8. As of the 17th of January, 2026, the material remains posted within #Legal.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charge against the Defendant:

• One count of Breaking Attorney-Client Privilege under §VIII(4)(d), committed when a person “discloses discussions of a client without their written permission.” Not only did the Defendant breach Attorney-Client Privilege after assuring their client it was in effect, they did so publicly in one of Redmont’s most trafficked channels.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

• 200 Penalty units, 20 minutes of imprisonment, and disbarment for one month.

Spoiler: P-001: Qualifications

Spoiler: P-002: Savannah’s Discord Roles

Spoiler: P-003a-P-003k: The entirety of 12700k’s ticket with Iustita Law.

Spoiler: P-004a-d: Savannah’s message in #Legal, as well as the shared screenshots.

Spoiler: P-005: Savannah’s follow-up message.

Spoiler: P-006: 12700k confirming he didn’t give permission.

Witnesses:
12700k
RookieBlue

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATE: This 17th day of January, 2026

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your Honour, per Rule 3.3, I shall be amending the facts of the criminal complaint as such:

1. .Savannah212467 is the Founder and Managing Partner at Iustita Law. (P-001) (P-002)
2. .Savannah212467 holds the Solicitor legal qualification, as well as Barrister legal qualifications in Constitutional Law and Property (P-002). (P-001).

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Savannah, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. .Savannah212467 [2026] FCR 3

ALL PARTIES, please review the new Regulations of the Federal Court!

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Savannah]

Present, your honour

 

[Muggy21]

Present, your honour

Thanks, please present a plea within 72 Hours.

 

[Savannah]

Plea​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Savannah212467
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
I Plea Not Guilty.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 21st day of January 2026

 

[Muggy21]

Discovery now Open
Until 1/26/26 @ 9pm EST.

 

[Savannah]

Discovery now Open
1/26/26 @ 9pm EST.

Your honour, is this saying it is open *until* 1/26/26 @ 9pm EST?

 

[Muggy21]

Your honour, is this saying it is open *until* 1/26/26 @ 9pm EST?

Dunno what you're talking about, it was always like that.

(thx)

 

[AmityBlamity]

The Commonwealth is content to end Discovery early if the Defendant agrees.

@Savannah

 

[Savannah]

I respectfully decline ending discovery early. Thank you.

 

[Savannah]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
The Defence requests all documents pertaining to the following from the Prosecution

1: the methodology the DoJ uses for sentencing recommendations
2: rules and regulations for prosecutorial misconduct aside from the publicly posted code of conduct in forums

 

[Savannah]

Your honour, I wish to file an anonymous whistleblower as a witness in closed court, and I wish to provide further details in said closed court.

 

[Muggy21]

Your honour, I wish to file an anonymous whistleblower as a witness in closed court, and I wish to provide further details in said closed court.

Created. Check discord for invite

 

[Savannah]

Your honour, I realize I have formatted this wrong, (I was half asleep when I posted this) may I please ask this to be struck and be permitted to repost this motion with the correct formatting?

 

[Savannah]

I pressed reply, idk why its not letting me reply to the post i want to reply to

 

[Muggy21]

Your honour, I realize I have formatted this wrong, (I was half asleep when I posted this) may I please ask this to be struck and be permitted to repost this motion with the correct formatting?

Go for it

 

[Savannah]

Motion​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

The Defense requests all documents pertaining to the following from the Prosecution

1: the methodology the DoJ uses for sentencing recommendations

2: rules and regulations for prosecutorial misconduct aside from the publicly posted code of conduct in forums.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

The Defense requests all documents pertaining to the following from the Prosecution

1: the methodology the DoJ uses for sentencing recommendations

2: rules and regulations for prosecutorial misconduct aside from the publicly posted code of conduct in forums.

Please find attached the DoJ Policy Handbook.

 

[Muggy21]

@AmityBlamity @Savannah

Parties shall have 48 Hours to prepare an Opening Statement.
Deadline: 1/30/26 @ 9PM EST.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Opening Statement

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your Honour,

Today, we are faced with a saddening case. One that damages the reputation of the legal profession, and shakes confidence in those who represent us in court. 12700k approached .Savannah212467 in confidence, fully trusting that the information he shared would be kept secret, as Attorney-Client privilege dictates. .Savannah212467 responded by airing this information openly in a public Discord server.

Per precedent from Commonwealth of Redmont v. AsexualDinosaur [2025] FCR 127,” in order for an Attorney to commit a Breach of Attorney-Client privilege, one must prove the following aspects:

1. The material in question was privileged.
2. The Commonwealth must demonstrate that the actor who allegedly disclosed the privileged material was an attorney bound by the duties imposed by the Criminal Code Act.
3. The attorney must improperly disclose the material.”

Firstly, was the material in question privileged? Most certainly. The material shared was screenshots from a private ticket where 12700k was asking questions relating to a legal matter. 12700k even asked if Attorney-Client privilege was in effect, which .Savannah212467 confirmed. As 12700k confirmed in P-006, he did not give permission, written or otherwise, for .Savannah212467 to share this material. Thus, the material in question was privileged.

Secondly, was the actor who allegedly disclosed the privileged material an attorney bound by the duties imposed by the Criminal Code Act? Absolutely. .Savannah212467 is an experienced member of Redmont’s legal scene, the Founder and Managing Partner at Iustita Law and someone in possession of the Solicitor legal qualification, as well as Barrister legal qualifications in Constitutional Law and Property. Per P-002, she was acting in her capacity as Managing Partner at Iustita Law, offering legal advice on a question posed by 12700k. Thus, we can confirm she was an attorney bound by the duties imposed by the Criminal Code Act.

Thirdly, was the material improperly disclosed? Without a doubt. It is one thing to share privileged information in private. It is another altogether to post screenshots from a private ticket in the #Legal channel. .Savannah212467 did this knowing full well she did not have permission to do so, and that she had previously reassured 12700k that this material was protected. The material was absolutely improperly disclosed.

Your Honour, it is rare we are faced with an “open and shut case”, but I hope you will agree that this indeed one worthy of such a designation. .Savannah212467 broke Attorney-Client privilege and should face the full consequences for her actions.

 

[Savannah]

Your honour, may I have a 48 hr extension on my opening statement?

 

[Muggy21]

Your honour, may I have a 48 hr extension on my opening statement?

Granted, 48 hrs extra