Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17

[Superwoops]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

National Exchange of Redmont
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

The National Exchange of Redmont, tasked with keeping order and lawfulness in the exchange of securities, has violated the trust of investors by allowing a fraudulent business, Royal Dragon & Shell, to be listed on their platform for 5 months. This has not only hurt the stability of the financial sector, but the Commonwealth as a whole, and must not go unpunished.


I. PARTIES
Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
National Exchange of Redmont (Defendant)
.MgChamp2339 (CEO of the National Exchange of Redmont)


II. FACTS
1. RoyalDragon&Shell and RDS are two sole proprietorships owned by Luke201556 with a combined balance of $0. (P-001, P-002)
2. Royal Dragon and Shell was a publicly-traded security from August 11th, 2025, to January 11th, 2026, on the National Exchange of Redmont with 2,000,000 shares issued. (P-003, P-004, P-005)
3. Royal Dragon and Shell is not, and was never, an incorporated entity.
4. Sole proprietorships are owned by one person.
5. The then-active Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act did not allow for sole proprietorships to issue shares.
6. On August 11th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS on its platform, and reinforced the proposed initial valuation of $12,326,861.24. (P-003)
7. On September 21st, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $14,105,470.84. (P-003)
8. On October 21st, 2025, a member of the National Exchange of Redmont management team listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $14,535,178.48. (P-003)
9. On November 7th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO listed RDS’s monthly reporting, reinforcing the proposed valuation of $17,576,779.2. (P-003)
10. On November 11th, 2025, the National Exchange of Redmont CEO announced an RDS shareholders meeting and acknowledged the apparent existence of an RDS Board of Directors. (P-003)
11. During the month of October 2025, RDS reported total assets of $17,576,779.20 DC. (P-003, P-006)
12. All of the aforementioned valuations rely on a 1:10 exchange rate between $CRP and $DC as audited by Vendeka and reported by RDS. (P-003, P-006, P-007)
13. The real exchange rate between $CRP and $DC is lower than 1:10.
14. The Azalea Isles (CityRP) are not recognised by Redmont.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. 4 counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation: The National Exchange of Redmont signed off on the firm’s listing of foreign assets as assets in Redmont using a 1:10 exchange rate from the date of the initial listing on August 11th, up until the liquidation of RDS on January 11th. This greatly inflated the true value of Royal Dragon & Shell in Redmont from not even close to $1,000,000, all the way up to over $17,000,000. Its listing was also permitted despite its status of non-incorporation. The Commercial Standards Act grants Stock Exchanges the privilege of being the sole type of institution able to list securities, and this privilege comes with a responsibility. By not reporting a problem with RDS’s operations, the National Exchange of Redmont breached its duty of care mandated by the Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act and that any other reasonable Manager would have had considering that the investments of several citizens were at stake. In this way, NER aided RDS in committing Market Manipulation. Each count of Third-Party Misrepresentation represents each time the NER posted RDS’s monthly financial reports on its platform - each of these were distinct and repeated acts of misrepresentation.
2. 1 count of Misleading Advertising: By claiming that RDS was able to have shareholders on November 11th, the National Exchange of Redmont committed Misleading Advertising as, while shares may be given out on NER, the issuing of these shares are not authorised in Redmont under the Legal Entity Act, which requires a Certificate of Incorporation to authorise shares.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. 400 Penalty Units and 40 minutes of imprisonment for 4 counts of Third-Party Misrepresentation.
2. 50 Penalty Units for 1 count of Misleading Advertising.

V. WITNESSES
1. ElysiaCrynn (DOC Secretary)
2. DonTrillions (FRB Governor)


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 3rd day of March 2026.

​

EVIDENCE:

Spoiler: P-001

View attachment 76168​

Spoiler: P-002

View attachment 76160

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

View attachment 76161

Spoiler: P-005

View attachment 76162

Spoiler: P-006

SEE PDF.

Spoiler: P-007

SEE PDF.

Spoiler: P-008

View attachment 76165

Spoiler: P-009

SEE PDF.

 

[Muggy21]

Given my ownership of TheStockExchange, I publicly recuse from the consideration or discussion of this case.

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@MgChamp, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[MgChamp]

Writ of Summons​

@MgChamp, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. National Exchange of Redmont [2026] FCR 17
Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case. Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Present your honor

 

[ko531]

Present your honor

You have 48 hours to provide a Plea

 

[EmmDubz]

You have 48 hours to provide a Plea

Good morning your honour,

The Defence would kindly like to ask for an extension of roughly 48 hours, acknowledging it's close to the deadline, as we're currently assessing our options for available legal counsel.

 

[ko531]

Good morning your honour,

The Defence would kindly like to ask for an extension of roughly 48 hours, acknowledging it's close to the deadline, as we're currently assessing our options for available legal counsel.

Granted

 

[EmmDubz]

Plea

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

National Exchange of Redmont
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
No Contest

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of March, 2026

 

[ko531]

Plea

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

National Exchange of Redmont
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
No Contest

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of March, 2026

This case will now enter Discovery. Discovery will last until March 18th at 7:36pm CST or until both sides agree to end discovery early.

 

[ko531]

Discover is now over, we will be moving on to opening statements. The commonwealth has 72 hours to provide their opening statements.

 

[Superwoops]

Opening Statement

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT

Your honour,
The Prosecution levies 5 criminal charges on the National Exchange of Redmont regarding their listing and subsequent consistent reinforcement of the listing of Royal Dragon & Shell.

On the principal crime
As Third-Party Misrepresentation is a charge that inherently relies on a principal charge, we will address the principal charge first. Market Manipulation is committed when a party "being a person with responsibility for a public company or asset, fraudulently inflates or deflates its value; or undertakes any activity, regardless of a direct responsibility for a public company or asset, with the primary intention to artificially influence the price or trading volume of a security for personal gain." We then find that Royal Dragon & Shell, being a publicly traded company, inflated its true value by listing mostly foreign assets; P-007 showcases that the great majority of RDS's assets were held in an unrecognised foreign nation. Because these assets are uncontrollable by Court's rulings and completely shielded from the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Redmont, the Commonwealth views these assets as assets holding a net zero value. While an exchange rate may, in theory, exist, since the assets are unrecognised, the holder of said assets is not afforded the rights that would have otherwise come with the listing of Redmont dollars. Fundamentally, this is because the duties of holding these unrecognised assets cannot be met by the holder: because Redmont cannot in practice enforce any action surrounding these funds, it therefore cannot protect investors. Because of this, the Commonwealth and this Court must view these foreign assets as ones holding no legally cognizable value in the jurisdiction of the Commonwelath of Redmont even while private dealings of this denomination may exist.

There is another issue to consider as well. RDS inflated its value in a second way, which was through the publication of an arbitrary exchange rate to convert its foreign assets into the Redmont dollar. This purported rate was 1:10 $CRP-$DC. The Prosecution will prove, mainly through witness testimony, that the real exchange rate was much lower at the time of the transaction. In this instance, the Court will have the opportunity to hear from two of the leading experts in economics in Redmont, both of which have been very involved in the public sector.

​

Opening Statement

Finally, Royal Dragon & Shell shares never legally existed. The Act of Congress - Legal Entity Act only permits incorporated entities to file shares of their companies.

Regarding the Exchange's liability
Now that we've established that Market Manipulation was indeed committed, we must look at the National Exchange of Redmont's liability in this ordeal.

Third-Party Misrepresentation is committed when a party "aids or abets a party or entity in committing market manipulation, including unknowingly participating in a pump and dump scheme." It is apparent that the National Exchange of Redmont aided RDS in committing Market Manipulation. Most importantly, the reasoning behind this is, due to the arguments presented above, RDS cannot be thought of as a Redmont-based security. Since most of its assets are not held in Redmont, it can only be called a foreign-based security. Because the Act of Congress - Commercial Standards Act only allows exchanges to list Redmont-based securities for public trading, this is the first concrete proof of wrongdoing.It is important to mention that the CCA says "aids or abets." There is therefore a clear difference between the two. While to aid is to help, to abet may require a higher burden of proof. It is, however, undeniable that, had NER not listed and kept RDS up as a security for so long, RDS would not have committed Market Manipulation. It would be unreasonable to assume that not one employee of NER took one look at the books that RDS was publishing. This reckless behaviour is relevant; as registered Exchanges are awarded certain rights (such as being the only entities capable of listing securities), they also must do their due diligence. The issue of the National Exchange of Redmont not raising an alarm on the fact that RDS was never allowed to issue shares and, as a result, shareholders were never really so, is also worth noting and also makes the NER criminally liable. For the reasons stated above, the National Exchange of Redmont has failed investors and has committed Third-Party Misrepresentation.

On misleading advertising
As seen in P-003, the CEO of NER posted an announcement on the 11th of Novermber, 2025 in the RDS channel within the NER server. In it, it referenced "shareholders". While shares may appear to have been issued to investors, they legally never were. As RDS was never incorporated, the Legal Entity Act did not allow it to issue any shares. This advertisement therefore gave off the wrong idea about the legal status of the listed company and constitutes a misleading advertisement.

About these proceedings
Finally, the Prosecution would like to point out that the Defense has pled no contest. That is, the Defense does not contest any of the 14 facts presented by the Prosecution. While lead counsel would normally move for summary judgement, we believe witness testimony will prove valuable to Your Honour.​

I would also like to apologise to this Court for this statement being submitted a few minutes late.

 

[ko531]

The defense now has 72 hours to provide their opening statements