Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lukadukas [2026] FCR 2

_budo

_budo

Citizen
Justice Department
Health Department
_budo
_budo
State Prosecutor
Joined
Dec 29, 2025
Messages
14

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Lukadukas
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT

Two chestshops were found selling illegal shines at C319. Both of these chestshops were owned by Lukadukas along with the plot C319.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. Lukadukas

II. FACTS
1. In response to a report received by the Department of Justice, Lead investigator Rookieblue14 acting in this official capacity conducted a recorded premise check of C319. (P-001)
2. Following this inspection, Lead Investigator Rookieblue14 filed a search warrant to seize the illicit substances on scene, as well as to obtain transaction logs for sales at the shops, as well as placement logs for the chest, sign, and barrels. (P-002)
3. Lukadukas placed the chests selling the Irish Shine and Glow Berry Shine elixirs (P-003, P-004)
4. Lukadukas placed the sign creating the chest shop (P-005, P-006)
5. Lukadukas placed the Irish Shine and Glow Berry Shine elixirs in the chests (P-007, P-008, P-009, P-010, P-011, P-012)
6. One sale of Irish Shine Elixir was made. (P-013, P-014)
7. Irish Shine and Glow Berry Shine elixirs are considered Illicit Substances by the Criminal Terminology Act.
8. The sale of Illicit Substances is illegal

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One count of Illicit Substance Trafficking, per Part VI, Section 2 of the Criminal Code Act. This offence is committed when a person "sells, distributes, or traffics any quantity of an illicit substance". Given that Irish Shine Elixir and Glow Berry Shine Elixir are all Illicit Substances under Section 4(1)(c) of the Criminal Terminology Act and that Defendant, had made 1 sale of Irish Shine Elixir, was in direct violation of this statute one time.
2. One count of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking, per Part IX, Section 23 of the Criminal Code Act. This offence is committed when a person "intends to commit a crime, even if it has not yet been carried out". Given that Irish Shine Elixir and Glow Berry Shine Elixir are all Illicit Substances under Section 4(1)(c) of the Criminal Terminology Act and that Defendant, had a chestshop selling Glow Berry Shine Elixir which didn't make a sale, was in direct violation of this statute one time.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. A 100 Penalty Unit Fine, and 60 minutes of imprisonment, with respect to one Count of Illicit Substance Trafficking.
2. A 50 Penalty Unit Fine, and 30 minutes of imprisonment, with respect to one Count of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking.

V. WITNESS LIST
1. Rookieblue14

VI. EVIDENCE
Staff Ticket Transcript.pdf (attached at the end)
Barrel_Placement_1.png
Barrel_Placement_2.png
Sign_Placement_1.png
Sign_Placement_2.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_1.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_2.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_3.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_4.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_5.png
Barrel_Storage_Logs_6.png
Transaction_1.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 14th day of January, 2026



*Edit: evidence was wiped out after the site went down, so I attached it again.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Writ of Summons

@Lukadukas, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Lukadukas [2026] FCR 2

**PLEASE REVIEW NEW REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL COURT**

Courts

Information Thread 'Regulations of the Federal Court'

REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL COURT
(Enacted pursuant to Judicial Standards Act § 16)

§ 1. Authority and Scope
1.1. Pursuant to § 16 of the Judicial Standards Act, the Federal Court enacts the following Procedural Regulations governing docketing, case numbering, participation of parties and non-parties, trial procedure, and post-trial practice.
1.2. Pursuant to Rule 1.2 of the Court Rules and Procedures, the Presiding Officer shall have discretion in the application of these rules. If warranted, the Presiding Officer may modify these rules in a specific...

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Seeing no response from the Defendant, the Court will request a Public Defender.
 
Public Defender Program is present, Your Honour.
 

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Lukadukas (Public Defender Program representing)
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. Defendant pleads GUILTY to one count of Illicit Substance Trafficking.
2. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to one count of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18th day of January 2026.

 
Last edited:
Julia_ said:

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Lukadukas (Public Defender Program representing)
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. Defendant pleads GUILTY to one count of Illicit Substance Trafficking.
2. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to one count of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This (day) day of (month) (year)

Click to expand...
Your Honour,
I accidently forgot to include the necessary date for the plea. I respectfully request permission to edit it as necessary.
 
Julia_ said:
Your Honour,
I accidently forgot to include the necessary date for the plea. I respectfully request permission to edit it as necessary.
Click to expand...

Certainly.

Further, discovery is open for 5 days.
Deadline 1/23/26 @ 9pm EST.
 

Opening Statement


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Opening Statement -

Your Honour,
Throughout the duration of this trial, the prosecution will prove how the defendant is guilty of the crime "Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking" beyond a reasonable doubt.

I. What exactly is Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking?

  • According to the Criminal Code Act, Conspiracy to Commit a Crime is defined as
    "A person commits an offence if the person:
    (a) intends to commit a crime, even if it has not yet been carried out."
    which would mean that a person would commit an offence of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking if they intend to commit Illicit Substance Trafficking, even if it has not yet been carried out.
  • According to the Criminal Code Act, Illicit Substance Trafficking is defined as
    "A person commits an offence if the person:
    (a) sells, distributes, or traffics any quantity of an illicit substance."
  • So, we can say that a person would commit an offence of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking if they intend to sell, distribute or traffic any quantity of an illicit substance even if the act has not yet been carried out.

II. Elements required for this crime
  • From the definition we derived earlier, we can say that the only element required to prove Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking is intent. I.e. if the prosecution can prove intent, the defendant is guilty of this crime. This is further cemented in Inknet v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 86.
III. Proving Intent
  • The defendant had 2 chestshops which were selling Irish Shine Elixer and Glow Berry Shine Elixer respectively. Both of these chestshops were stocked up by the defendant. Both of these items are Illicit Substances under Section 4(1)(c) of the Criminal Terminology Act. (see P-001 and P-007 to P-012)
  • The chestshop selling Irish Shine Elixer made a sale, but the chestshop selling Glow Berry Shine Elixer didn't, so, the prosecution is charging the defendant for Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking for the chestshop selling Glow Berry Shine Elixer. (see P-013)
  • Lead investigator Rookieblue14 was able to buy Glow Berry Shine Elixer from the chestshop while investigating it without any problems, this implies that any player on the server could've bought the shine the same way. This shows clear intent to sell an illicit substance. (see P-001)

Therefore, the Prosecution hopes that the court finds the Defendant guilty of one count of Conspiracy to Commit Illicit Substance Trafficking as they clearly intended to sell an illicit substance.

 
Your Honour,
Defendant respectfully requests a twenty-four-hour extension. I'm swamped with schoolwork.
 
Your Honour,
Defendant respectfully requests a final fifteen-hour extension.
 
Julia_ said:
Your Honour,
Defendant respectfully requests a final fifteen-hour extension.
Click to expand...

Denied, you'll make additional arguments during Closing, I see no reason to delay for Opening.
 
@_budo

You have 48 Hours to present witness questioning to RookieBlue14 in according with the Regulations of the Federal Court.
 
Questions

1. Are you the officer who conducted the inspection in P-001?
2. If the answer to the first question is yes, were you able to buy the glow berry shine without any issues?
3. Did you find any signs or anything informing you that buying the shine is illegal?
4. Was the shine being sold in an area which was publicly accessible?
 

Writ of Summons

@Rookieblue14 , please answer the questions when you arrive.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.



@_budo Ask all followups and advise the Court when you've completed your questioning.
 
Good morning your honor, I am present.

1) I was the Department of Justice Investigator that conducted the premise check in P-001, yes.

2) Yes.

3) No.

4) Yes.
 
Thank you, that's all the questions from the prosecution's side.
@Muggy21
 
@Julia_
You have 24 Hours to present questions on cross-examination, an extension of 24hrs will be automatically granted if the Court is advised.
 
I am second chair for this case as PDD.
 
The Defense requests a 24-hour extension (Docket N°20)
 
The Public Defender has failed to offer cross-examination after a requested extension. He shall be held in Contempt of Court. He shall be fined $500 and jailed for 5 minutes.


@_budo You have 72 Hours to offer a Closing Statement. In this statement, please include the basis for your sentencing recommendation.
 

Closing Statement


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Closing Argument -
The defendant is guilty of the crime conspiracy to commit illicit substance trafficking due to the following factors.

  • As explained in the prosecution's opening statement, the element required to prove conspiracy to commit illicit substance trafficking is intent.
  • The prosecution believes that it has proved the defendant's intent to sell an illicit item beyond a reasonable doubt by showing how the chestshops were
    (a) The chestshop selling Glow Berry Shine Elixir was stocked up.
    (b) It was placed in an area which was accessible by any player as testified by the witness Rookieblue14.
    (c) Any player could've bought Glow Berry Shine Elixir from this chestshop without any issues in the same way Rookieblue14 did.

    The prosecution hopes for the court to evaluate the following factors and sentence the defendant accordingly.
Basis for Sentencing Recommendation
  • The defendant was in direct violation of the statute.
  • The defendant didn't mention anywhere that buying Glow Berry Shine Elixir was illegal and placed the chestshop in a publicly accessible area where anyone could buy it.
  • Taking the factors mentioned into account, the prosecution believes that the maximum sentence for this crime is justified.

 
@Julia_ @Superwoops You have 72 Hours to offer a Closing Statement and Sentencing Recommendation.
 

Closing Statement


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT

Your Honour,
May it please the Court:

The Criminal Code Act defines a charge of as Illicit Substance Trafficking:
> "sells, distributes, or traffics any quantity of an illicit substance."

Further, the Criminal Code Act defines Conspiracy to Commit a Crime as:
> "intends to commit a crime, even if it has not yet been carried out."

Looking at the definition we provided for Illicit Substance Trafficking earlier, an individual must either sell, distribute, or traffic any quantity of an illicit substance to commit the crime.

The Oxford English Dictionary (hereinafter referred to as the “OED”) defines “traffic” as:
> "deal or trade in something illegal."

Further, the OED defines “deal” (one of the two words in which a person can “traffic” something illegal) as:
> take part in commercial trading of a particular commodity.

By creating a chestshop, Defendant took part in the commercial trading of the illicit substances.
Therefore, Defendant could not have conspired to commit illicit substance trafficking, as the crime (which is Illicit Substance Trafficking) had been carried out and committed.





Brief


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION

Your Honour,
May it please the Court:

HARM WAS LITTLE TO NONE​

The Commonwealth is seemingly attempting to paint Defendant as a Walter White-esque buff dealer. This is simply not true. Defendant was a new brewer who had no access to the Criminal Code Act or the Criminal Terminology Act (due to Defendant not having any sort of forums or Discord account) and therefore most likely did not have access to the list of illicit substances.

Further, looking at the Commonwealth’s own evidence, we can see that only one sale was made. This certainly shows that no real harm came from Defendant’s actions.

SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION​

Therefore, the Defence recommends the following sentencing:
- 25 Penalty Unit Fine; and
- 15 Minutes of Imprisonment.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top