Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2026] FCR 50

[AmityBlamity]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Gregg
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

On or about the 25th of March, our democracy suffered a crippling blow. v__d's terrorist forces, under the command of lukeyyyMC_, stormed the Capitol building. In the face of these treasonous attackers, Gregg decided to ignore his ONLY DUTY (that being to defend the Capitol), and instead allowed the rioters to seize control of the building. He is a disgrace, and must face punishment for his treasonous actions.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution, represented by Amity Justice)
2. Gregg (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On or about the 25th of March, terrorists attacked the capitol building.
2. Gregg watched the terrorists attack the building, and did nothing to stop them.
3. Gregg allowed Redmont to briefly fall to these terrorists, and made no efforts to call for help or attempt to stop their actions in any way.
4. Through his inaction, multiple people were gunned down by terrorists. Innocents that Gregg was sworn to protect.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One count of Treason - We believe that Gregg betrayed the Constitution and the very people he swore to defend. Treason is an appropriate punishment.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. On the one count of Treason, the maximum charge of 250 Penalty Units ($25,000), and 2 months disqualification from office.
2. We also ask that the court fire Gregg from his position, and appoint a superior candidate in his place.

P-001: Footage of Capitol being stormed

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Signed,
Amity Justice

DATED: This 11th day of June, 2026.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

We request that this Court move to suspend Gregg from his position for the duration of this court case. Due to Gregg's ineptitude and clear disdain for the Commonwealth, it is clear he can no longer be trusted.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, I know asking prior to summons is uncommon, however given the extreme nature of the Emergency Injunction and hostile attitude of the prosecution, we ask to be permitted to respond to the Motion for Emergency Injunction before it is ruled upon.

Spoiler: Consent to Represent

 

[Smallfries]

I will be presiding officer in this matter.

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - STANDING

The Court is concerned that the case before us today lacks standing. Particularly, rule 2.1(1) seems unfulfilled (suffered some injury caused by a clear second party).

The "Defendant" in this case appears to be an npc, mere lines of code with no will or autonomy and living only within the server. The Court, on first view, is unsure how the alleged defendant is any more than even a naturally-spawning mob. The Commonwealth is ordered to show how this case is at best a misguided attempt at prosecution, and at worst a frivolous case to be dismissed sua sponte with prejudice like that in Plura72 v. Air [2025] DCR 31.