Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

ameslap

ameslap

Citizen
Congressional Staff
State Department
Justice Department
Education Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
5th Anniversary Change Maker Staff Popular in the Polls
ameslap
ameslap
Press Assistant
Joined
Jan 7, 2025
Messages
415

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

EatYourGreens_
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT

On November 13th, 2025 DHS Recruit Officer Culls was acting in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer attempting to take FracturedGhast7 into custody. While making the arrest, Recruit Culls was killed by EatYourGreens.
Click to expand...

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. EatYourGreens

II. FACTS
1. On November 13th, DHS Recruit Officer Culls went to arrest FracturedGhast7. (P-001)
2. While attempting to detain FracturedGhast7, EatYourGreens killed Recruit Culls. (P-001)
3. EatYourGreens believed they were the one being detained, as he was wanted for murder at the time. (P-002)
4. EatYourGreens admitted to killing Recruit Culls by apologizing. (P-002)

III. CHARGES
1. Obstruction of Justice: Eat YourGreens willfully interfered with the process of justice by harming a law enforcement officer while they were attempting to arrest a suspect.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. For Obstruction of Justice: 60 minutes of imprisonment and 3 penalty units.

V. WITNESS LIST
1. EatYourGreens- Defendant
2. Culls - Arresting Officer
3. FracturedGhast7 - Eye-witness

VI. EVIDENCE
P-001.png
P-003.png
P-002.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 3rd day of December, 2025

 

Writ of Summons

@EatYourGreens (EatYourGreens_), is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for such responses shall be 48 hours after the motion was filed.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
@EatYourGreens has failed to appear within 72 hours of the summons. As he has otherwise been active (C-001), he is hereby held in Contempt of Court and shall be fined R$1,000 and imprisoned for 10 minutes.

A public defender has been called and will appear shortly.

Screenshot 2025-12-07 at 23.01.07.png
 
Vennefly said:
@EatYourGreens has failed to appear within 72 hours of the summons. As he has otherwise been active (C-001), he is hereby held in Contempt of Court and shall be fined R$1,000 and imprisoned for 10 minutes.

A public defender has been called and will appear shortly.

View attachment 68513
Click to expand...


Your Honour,

I have just been assigned to this case as PD.
 
Your honor, we have come to a plea agreement:

The Defendant shall:
1. Plea Guilty to the charge of Obstruction of Justice
2. Be imprisoned for 15 minutes
3. Be fined 1.5 penalty units

@Vernicia can attest to this and we ask that the court order it.

Thank you.
 
@Vernicia have you discussed this with your client and does he agree?
 
Vennefly said:
@Vernicia have you discussed this with your client and does he agree?
Click to expand...

I have discussed this with my client, and he "does not want to deal with the court" or anything around it. I believe this plea deal fulfills his wishes.
 
Your honor,

Obviously @EatYourGreens plans to represent themselves and has intended to represent themselves this entire time.

I ask that you release @Vernicia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Accidentally typed post before I was done…

I ask that you release @Vernicia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
WHAT THE HECK.

I ask that you release Vern, hold EatYourGreens in contempt again, and…

I move for Default Judgement since EatYourGreens decided not to pursue this case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ameslap said:
Your honor,

Obviously @EatYourGreens plans to represent themselves and has intended to represent themselves this entire time.

I ask that you release @Vernicia
Click to expand...
ameslap said:
Accidentally typed post before I was done…

I ask that you release @Vernicia
Click to expand...
ameslap said:
WHAT THE HECK.

I ask that you release Vern, hold EatYourGreens in contempt again, and…

I move for Default Judgement since EatYourGreens decided not to pursue this case.
Click to expand...

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

I wish to strike the above. I was on my phone when typing and it made everything bad. I'm SO SORRY!



That being said...

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor,

It appears that EatYourGreens had every intention to defend themselves, and is now refusing counsel. Since they did not ever appear for anything or submit anything, I request that you:
1. Hold them in Contempt once again;
2. Go to Default Judgement with the full sentence for this disregard of the law and rejecting the plea deal;
3. Release @Vernicia from Counsel since EatYourGreens appears to not want any counsel.

Thank you.

 
EatYourGreens said:
I do not agree.
Click to expand...

@EatYourGreens do you wish to represent yourself in these proceedings, do you wish to continue with Vernicia as Public Defender or do you wish to appoint another lawyer as your counsel?

You must answer within 48 hours. Failure to answer will result in being held in Contempt of Court.
 
ameslap said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE

I wish to strike the above. I was on my phone when typing and it made everything bad. I'm SO SORRY!

Click to expand...

STRUCK as requested.
 
Vennefly said:
@EatYourGreens do you wish to represent yourself in these proceedings, do you wish to continue with Vernicia as Public Defender or do you wish to appoint another lawyer as your counsel?

You must answer within 48 hours. Failure to answer will result in being held in Contempt of Court.
Click to expand...
I am unsure why @ameslap is attempting to speak for me, I do wish to stick with Vernicia as my public defender.
 
ameslap said:
Your honor, we have come to a plea agreement:

The Defendant shall:
1. Plea Guilty to the charge of Obstruction of Justice
2. Be imprisoned for 15 minutes
3. Be fined 1.5 penalty units

@Vernicia can attest to this and we ask that the court order it.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

Plea Deal DENIED. A Guilty Plea in a criminal proceeding constitutes a personal waiver of constitutional rights by the Defendant. As such, circumstances allowing, such a Plea must be assented to by Defendant personally. In cases where Defendant is reasonably reachable, a Guilty Plea can therefore only be entered with consent from the Defendant themselves. As in this case Defendant has voiced his disagreement with the proposed Plea Deal, the Court must reject it.
 
ameslap said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor,

It appears that EatYourGreens had every intention to defend themselves, and is now refusing counsel. Since they did not ever appear for anything or submit anything, I request that you:
1. Hold them in Contempt once again;
2. Go to Default Judgement with the full sentence for this disregard of the law and rejecting the plea deal;
3. Release @Vernicia from Counsel since EatYourGreens appears to not want any counsel.

Thank you.

Click to expand...

DENIED. A Guilty Plea in a criminal proceeding constitutes a personal waiver of constitutional rights by the Defendant. Refusal by the Defendant to assent to a Plea Deal, even when voiced in the manner that Defendant has used here, does not entitle the Prosecution to a Default Judgement. Such a Default Judgement would be a gross violation of Defendant's right to a fair trial, their right to be confronted with the evidence against them, and their right to have the assistance of legally qualified counsel for their defence.

@Vernicia please present a Plea within 48 hours.
 

Plea​


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Eatyourgreens
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. Not Guilty

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 13 day of December 2025
 
We will now enter discovery, which will last for 5 days. Discovery may be ended early upon joint request by the Parties.

@Vernicia @ameslap
 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your honor,

We request that the Plaintiff be compelled to submit any screenshots, chat logs, or videos they have from the incident on November 13th.

Thank you

 
ameslap said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

Your honor,

We request that the Plaintiff be compelled to submit any screenshots, chat logs, or videos they have from the incident on November 13th.

Thank you

Click to expand...
I have committed a great offense by typing the wrong party.

Please compel the Defendant to produce this evidence not the Plaintiff.

I am sorry for this gaffe.
 
ameslap said:
I have committed a great offense by typing the wrong party.

Please compel the Defendant to produce this evidence not the Plaintiff.

I am sorry for this gaffe.
Click to expand...

DENIED. A Defendant in a criminal case cannot be compelled to disclose incriminating evidence against themselves.
 
Vennefly said:
DENIED. A Defendant in a criminal case cannot be compelled to disclose incriminating evidence against themselves.
Click to expand...
Sounds good.

We are ready to proceed.

If the Defendant is willing, we would also be open to an in-game trial.
 
We do not wish for an in-game trial and rather have a standart trial.
 
Trial will now commence.

@ameslap please present an opening statement for the Commonwealth within 72 hours. Immediately after posting your opening statement, @Vernicia will have 72 hours to present Defendant's opening statement.

For the Commonwealth: please tag opposing counsel in your filing so they know when their time starts.
 

Opening Statement


Your Honor,

Today, the Commonwealth will begin presenting a clear case that the Defendant, EatYourGreens_, committed obstruction of justice. This charge is not merely about an unfortunate encounter, but a willful interference with the lawful operations of justice.

On November 13th, 2025, Officer Culls, acting in his official capacity as an Officer, was attempting to execute a lawful arrest of FracturedGhast7. During this action, EatYourGreens_ intentionally and violently interfered with that process. The Defendant killed Officer Culls at the very moment the officer was performing his duties. This act directly derailed an essential component of justice.

Obstruction of Justice is defined as follows:

(a) willfully interferes with the process of justice by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a witness, potential witness, or law enforcement officer; or
(b) knowingly provides false information to a law enforcement officer in the course of their duties.
Click to expand...

EatYourGreens_ did just that. Taking action not in self-defense, but in a manner that was made to disrupt an officer executing the process of justice.

The defense may suggest that EatYourGreens_ believed he was the subject of the arrest and all should be forgiven because he apologized. That belief, even if true, changes nothing.

Obstruction of Justice does not hinge on who the defendant believed was being arrested. It hinges on whether the defendant willfully interfered with a lawful law enforcement action. Whether Office Culls was arresting FracturedGhast7 or EatYourGreens_ himself, the outcome is legally identical: the defendant used force to stop an officer from executing the law.

For these reasons, the Commonwealth will ask this Court to find that EatYourGreens_ obstructed justice and must be held accountable under the law.

Thank you.



@Vernicia
 
Your Honor,

In the spirit of Christmas, may the defendant have a 2-day extension here?
 
I do not celebrate Christmas. Do not offer me any Christmas spirit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EatYourGreens said:
I do not celebrate Christmas. Do not offer me any Christmas spirit.
Click to expand...

These remarks are wholly irrelevant to these proceedings and serve no legitimate purpose. They will be struck from the record.

You must not post messages that are irrelevant, disruptive, or otherwise derail the proceedings of this Court. Engaging in such conduct may result in being held in Contempt of Court, which carries sanctions up to a R$10,000 fine and 10 minutes of imprisonment.
 
Vennefly said:
These remarks are wholly irrelevant to these proceedings and serve no legitimate purpose. They will be struck from the record.

You must not post messages that are irrelevant, disruptive, or otherwise derail the proceedings of this Court. Engaging in such conduct may result in being held in Contempt of Court, which carries sanctions up to a R$10,000 fine and 10 minutes of imprisonment.
Click to expand...
It was relevant. I was suggesting that the court proceed.
 
EatYourGreens said:
I represent myself, I will not subject Vernicia with this case.
Click to expand...

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion For Clarification

Your honor,

While unusual and this may not be a proper motion, it is an important one.

The Commonwealth wishes to clarify if the Defendant was always representing themselves or if Vernicia was indeed the Defendant’s counsel until just now.

Thank you.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top